Advanced Search Results

Atmaram and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197 and 197(1); Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 161(1)

Reported in : AIR1965Bom131; (1965)67BOMLR25; 1965CriLJ197; ILR1965Bom126; 1965MhLJ238

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Mudholkar, Additional Government Pleader and ;P.G. Palsikar, Honorary Asstt. Government Pleader

(1) Three police officials, now under suspension, are challenging their convictions and sentences under sections 330, 342, 343 and 348 of the Indian Penal Code.(2) The appellants Atamaram and Uttam are Head Constables and the appellant...

Babu Ali and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 323, 498A and 506

Reported in : I(2003)DMC504

Advocate for Respondent : Palsikar, Panel Lawyer

ORDERS.L. Kochar, J.1. This is an application Under Section 438, Cr.P.C. in connection with Crime No. 86/2002 for the offence punishable Under Sections 498A, 323, 506, I.P.C.2. The applicant No. 1 Babu Ali is the husband...

Suresh Singh Kushwaha Vs. Municipal Corporation and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 67, 78, 79A, 79(3), 304, 305, 306 and 387; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 6; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 300A

Reported in : 2006(3)MPLJ412

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Chaturvedi, Adv. for the Respondent No. 1 and ;Ami Prabal, Dy. Adv. General for the Respondent No. 2-State

ORDERSubhash Samvatsar, J.1. This order shall govern the disposal of all these writ petitions as in all these petitions common question of law and fact is involved.2. Petitioners in all these three petitions, have filed these...

Wamanrao Motiramji Masodkar Vs. Amrutlal Gulabchand and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : C.P. and Berar Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1935 - Sections 19; C.P. and Berar Agricultural Produce Market Rules, 1935 - Rule 33(1) and 33(2)

Reported in : AIR1968Bom336; (1968)70BOMLR274; 1968CriLJ1227; 1968MhLJ217

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Deshpande, Adv. and ;P.G. Palsikar, Honorary Asst. Govt. Pleader

Abhyankar, J.(1) This appeal raises an interesting question regarding interpretation of Rule 33 of the rules framed under the C. P. and Berar Agricultural Produce Market Act. 1935 (Act No. XXIX of 1935).(2) The appellant is...

Ramchandra Govinda Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 101; General and Subsidiary Rules - Rules 52 and 52(1)

Reported in : AIR1962Bom41; (1961)63BOMLR711; ILR1961Bom923

Advocate for Respondent : P.G. Palsikar, Hony. Asst. Spl. Govt. Pleader

(1) The accused Ramchandra son of Govinda who was a Mechanical Signal Maintainer in the Central Railways at Dodra Mohor has filed this revision application against his conviction under S. 101 (a) and Section 101 (c)...

Ravindra Ramchandra Waghmare Vs. Indore Mun.Corp. and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11307 OF2016[Arising out of SLP [C]. No.30998 of 2010]. Ravindra Ramchandra Waghmare …. Appellant Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation & Ors. ….Respondents WITH Civil Appeal...

Suhas Manohar Pande Vs. Manohar Shamrao Pande

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9, 9(1) and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rule 4; Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act, 1949

Reported in : AIR1971Bom183; ILR1971Bom815

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Nandedkar, ;V.R. Manohar and ;M.S. Deshpande, Advs.

Padhye, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit for maintenance filed by the appellant Suhas alias Ambadas against the respondent Manohar on the allegation that he is the son of the respondent Manohar and is...

Trikamji Damji Vs. Bhikalal Wadilal Shah

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR732

Kotval, J.1. This is an application for revision under Section 20-A(3) of the C.P. and Berar Municipalities Act, 1922. It relates to a municipal election dispute. General elections were recently held in several municipalities in the...

Reliance Ispat Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15(1), 17 and 22(1); Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 23(1); Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 146

Reported in : [1993]77CompCas381(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : M.G. Upadhyaya, Deputy Adv. General

V.S. Kokje, J.1. In this case a show-cause notice was issued and in response a reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents. Rejoinder to the reply has also been filed on behalf of the...

Jawaharlal Daryavbuxmal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 147 and 148

Reported in : (1982)31CTR(MP)282; [1982]137ITR54(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Mukati, Adv.

Sohani, J. 1. By this reference under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, has referred the following question of law to this court...