Advanced Search Results

S.M. Mansoor Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2000)10SCC391

D.P. Mohapatra and; U.C. Banerjee, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.3. The question that arises for consideration is whether the High Court committed an error in denying arrears of pay to...

Dadan Ram and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 5(1), 6(1), 11(1), 15(1), 30(1), 32, 45B and 95B; Constitution of India - Article 146; Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Rules - Rule 5

Reported in : AIR2008SC588; 2007AIRSCW7609; (2007)13SCC583

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Mishra, Sr. Adv., ; Dhruv Kumar Jain, ; Upendra Mishra

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Whether the 'parcha holders', who are in possession of the land in question, have any right to be heard in a proceeding arising out of Section 45-B of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation...

Ram Chandra Singh Vs. Savitri Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Rules 1, 3, 5 and 6; Supreme Court Orders - Orders 9, 13, 40 and 67; Constitution of India - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 152

Reported in : AIR2004SC4096; 2004(6)ALD31(SC); 2004(4)AWC3625(SC); 2004(3)BLJR1720; 97(2004)CLT426(SC); 2004(172)ELT446(SC); [2004(4)JCR63(SC)]; JT2004(6)SC93; 2004(6)SCALE327; (2004)12S

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Mishra, Sr. Adv., ; Rajeev Shekhar Dwivedi, ; T.H. Vard

1. An application purported to be for clarification and/or modification of a judgment and order dated 9th October, 2003 has been filed by the respondents Nos. 1 to 6 of the Appeal contending that certain factual...

Mohamed Masthan Vs. Society, Congregation, Bros., S. Heart and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rules 35 and 97; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2006SC1706; 2006(2)AWC1896(SC); 2006(2)CTC407; [2006(3)JCR145(SC)]; JT2006(3)SC485; (2006)3MLJ233(SC); RLW2006(3)SC1963; 2006(3)SCALE209; (2006)9SCC344

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Mishra, Sr. Adv., ; Swarupa Reddy, ; Vallinayagam,

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The properties in question are said to be belonging to the Society of Congregation of the Brothers of the Sacred Heart. Brother Lawrance, who was then Superior General of the First...

Employer in Relation to Managment of Central Mine Planning and Design ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 17B; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 107 and 108; Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(9)

Reported in : AIR2001SC883; [2001(90)FLR120]; JT2001(2)SC87; (2001)ILLJ1069SC; 2001(1)SCALE374; (2001)2SCC588; [2001]1SCR651; (2001)1UPLBEC825

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Mishra, Sr. Adv., ; S. Reddy, ; V. Sharma, ;

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1.Leave is granted. 2.This appeal is from the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna, Ranchi Bench, in L.P.A.No.177 of 1999(R) dated August 9,...

Tek Chand Vs. Dile Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 36(2), 100(1) and 116-A; Constitution of India - Article 191 (1); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 48-A; Fundamental Rule 56; Bombay Civil Service Rules, Rule 161(2)

Reported in : AIR2001SC905; JT2001(2)SC114; (2001)2MLJ45(SC); 2001(1)SCALE471; (2001)3SCC290; [2001]1SCR527

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Mishra, Sr. Adv., ; Ms. Swarupa Reddy, ; Chandrashekhar

Shivaraj V. Patil, J. 1. Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 24.03.2000 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Election Petition No. 2/98, setting aside the election of the appellant from 61-Nachan (S.C.)...

Laxmikant Chhotelal Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 202 and 203; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR(SC)764; (2007)6MLJ172(SC); 2007(6)SCALE714; (2007)5SCC713

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Mishra, Sr. Adv., ; Satyajit A. Desai, ; Anagha S. Desa

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 herein were partners of a firm known as M/s. Somras Distillers. It ran into arrears inter alia in payment of sales tax.3. The properties of the...

Rajesh Kumar Pandey Vs. Zila Panchayat and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2430

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Mishra, S.C., ;R.K. Ojha and ;Akhileshwar Singh, Advs.

ORDERM. Katju and R. S. Tripathi, JJ.1. The petitioner is challenging the grant of contract for excavation of Sand and Morang in favour of respondent No. 3 in this writ petition.2. Learned standing counsel, Sri R.K....

Chandra Kishore Jha Vs. Mahavir Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81(1) and 86; Patna High Court - Rule 6, 7, 9, 13, 24; Indian Limitation Act, 1877; General Clauses Act - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1999SC3558; JT1999(7)SC256; 1999(6)SCALE40; (1999)8SCC266; [1999]Supp2SCR754; MANU/SC/0594/1999

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Mishra, ; Chandra Shekhar, ; R.P. Singh, ;

ORDERA.S. Anand, C.J.1. Election of Respondent No. 1 to the Bihar Legislative Assembly from 86, Ghanshyampur Assembly Constituency, held in March, 1995, was challenged by the appellant through an Election Petition on various grounds. The Election...

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by It Secretary, Education (Sse-i) ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT672

Advocate for Respondent : None appeared

P.S. Mishra, C.J.1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. No one has appeared for the respondent.2. Facts do not appear to be in dispute. Writ petitioner respondent is a recognised school and pursuant to the Government...