Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: p s chaudhary · Page 1 of about 29 results (0.125 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 22 2014

Makka Ram Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : May-22-2014

Subject : Criminal

D.B.Cr. Appeal No.1123/2004 1/8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Makka Ram vs. The State of Rajasthan D.B. Criminal Appeal No.1123/2004 under Section 374, Criminal Procedure Code against the judgment dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2013

Davinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-28-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Crl. Misc. not M-34876 o”1. .IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-34876 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 28th, 2013 Davinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2013

Davinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-20-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Crl. Misc. not M-34876 o”1. .IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-34876 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : January 28th, 2013 Davinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 27 2014

State Vs. Rakama

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Decided on : Nov-27-2014

Subject : Criminal

D.B.Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No.1041/2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B.Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. No.1041/2014 IN D.B.Criminal Appeal No.112/1999 (Rakma vs State of Raj.) Date of Order :: 27.11.2014 HON'BLE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2000

Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-07-2000

Subject : Commercial

Nagendra Rai, J.1. These nineteen writ applications have been filed by the common petitioner (for the convenience 'the petitioner') for quashing the assessment orders passed in nineteen cases on 16.5.1997 by respondent No. 6, the Sub-Divisional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2012

Patel Manabhai Mavjibhai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-08-2012

Subject : Criminal

J.B. Pardiwala, J. 1. This appeal is at the instance of a convict-accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, and is directed against an order of conviction and sentence dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2012

Desai Vikrambhai Sendhabhai and Others Vs. Desai Sankabhai Bijolbhai a ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-09-2012

Subject : Civil

ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The present Second Appeal u/s.100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellants herein - original defendant Nos.3 to 5 to quash and set aside the impugned judgement and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2014

Jasbir Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-18-2014

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.D-1508-DB of 2013 Date of Decision:-18.02.2014 Jasbir Kaur ....Appellant Versus State of Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL. HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2006

Paramjeet Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-20-2006

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 293, 313 and 374; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 15, 35, 42(2), 50, 52 and 54

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj2307; 2006(4)WLC23

Advocate for Respondent : J.P.S. Chaudhary, Public Prosecutor

H.R. Panwar, J.1. This criminal appeal Under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Code' hereinafter) is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.1.2003 passed by the Special Judge, N.D.S.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2002

A. Infrastructure Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-27-2002

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(144)ELT103TriDel

1. The Tribunal vide its order dated 9-11-2001 observed in this matter that the amount of duty and penalty had not been deposited by the appellants for the purpose of Section 35F of the Central Excise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial