Advanced Search Results

Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd. represented by its Director Ajay B ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to call for the records in C.C. No.263 of 2015 now pending on the file of the XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai and quash the...

1.V.Raveendran Vs. 1.Capt.S.K.Joshua

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.04.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN A.S.No.26 of 2005 and CMP No.724 of 2013 1.V.Raveendran 2.I.V.Reddy 3.I.Damodara Reddy 4.M.Hymavathi : Appellants/Plaintiffs versus 1.Capt.S.K.Joshua 2.T.K.Singaram 3.Jayathilakam :...

Management of William Goodacre and Sons Ltd., Alleppey and anr. Vs. Ne ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1), 25, 25(F), (FF) and (FFF)

Reported in : (1998)IMLJ242

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V. Selvaraj

A.R. Lakshmanan, J. 1. The respondent/workmen in both the writ Appeals field W.P. 7508 of 1985 to quash the award of the Industrial Tribunal, Madras in I.D. 38 of 1983 as published in G.O.Ms. No. 1295...

The Management of William Goodacre and Sons Ltd. and anr. Vs. K. Neela ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1998)1MLJ242

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V. Selvaraj

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The respondents/workmen in both the writ appeals filed W.P. No. 7508 of 1985 to quash the award of the Industrial Tribunal, Madras in I.D. No. 38 of 1983 as published in G.O. Ms....

A. Wilson Prince Vs. The Nazar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.17303 OF2022A. WILSON PRINCE …PETITIONER VERSUS THE NAZAR & ORS. …RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. This is a peculiar and an...

Amaravathy Vs. Binny Limited

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : II(1995)ACC42; 1996ACJ785

Advocate for Respondent : P. Ranganatha Reddy, Adv.

C.V. Govardhan, J.1. This appeal arises out of the order passed by Additional Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Madras, dated 15.10.1980 in W.C. Case No. 51 of 1980 filed under Section 10 of the Workmen's Compensation Act.2....

Petroleum Workers Union Represented by Regional Secretary, Hindustan P ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 12(3); Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10A

Reported in : (2004)IIILLJ100Mad

Advocate for Respondent : P. Ranganatha Reddy, Adv. for King and Partridge for respondents 1 and 2 and ;G. Jayachandran, Addl. Central Govt. Standing Counsel for 5th respondent

ORDERK.P. Sivasubramaniam, J. 1. The petitioners being the employees of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, have sought for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct respondents 1 and 2, to absorb eight workmen as permanent...

N. Sridhar Vs. Maruthi Jayaraman and M.R.F. Ltd. Rep. by Its Secretary

Court : Chennai

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 51, 53 and 108; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 379, 467, 468, 419, 420 and 471

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas100(Mad); (2009)6MLJ35

Advocate for Respondent : NDW for R1 and ;P. Ranganatha Reddy, Adv. for R2

M. Venugopal, J.1. The appellant/plaintiff has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2000 made in O.S. No. 9100 of 1995 by the learned II Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, in dismissing the...

Damayanthi Kailasam Vs. Mrs. D.F. Philips,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Benami Act, 1988 - Sections 2 and 4; Indian Succession Act - Sections 213(1) and 213(2); Hindu Succession Act - Sections 213(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 9

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC813; (2007)3MLJ331

Advocate for Respondent : R. Mohan, ;K. Dharanidharan and ;P. Ranganatha Reddy, Advs.

ORDERS. Ashok Kumar, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Additional District Judge, Chengalpattu in allowing the Interlocutory Applications filed by the defendants 1, 2 and 4, under Order 8, Rule 9 CPC seeking permission...

White Horse Communication Network Rep. by Its Managing Partner R. Raje ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : The Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 - Sections 4(3), 9, 203, 204, 205, 214(A), 220, 223A, 223(5) and 285; Tamil Nadu Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1959 - Sections 129A to 129F

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ1297

Advocate for Respondent : P. Ranganatha Reddy, Adv. ; for King and ; Partridge, Advs.

ORDERD. Murugesan. J. 1. The issue raised in all these writ petitions and writ appeals are common for the disposal of both the writ petitions and writ appeals. We refer the averments made in the writ...