Advanced Search Results
Vijay Enterprises Vs. Gopinath Mahade Koli and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-20-2006
Civil
Constitution of India - Sections 2 - Article 215
2006(4)ALLMR124; 2006(4)BomCR701
Vishal Phal, AGP. for CID, ;Anil Padiyar, Adv., ;for Mohan Kumar K. and ;Anna P. Contractors, Advs. in SCN No. 1357/05, ;R.P. Parkar, Adv. for Cont. Nos. 4 and 5, ;Rai and ;Pawse, Advs. in SCN 1357/05
S.U. Kamdar, J. 1. In a suit being Suit No. 1780 of 1993 a chamber summons was taken out by one Madhu Lakhma Kakade inter alia seeking relief that the applint should be added as a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.R. Patel Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
May-08-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)78ITD51(Mum.)
1. The assesses, an individual, is carrying on business of construction activities, in his own name and in the names of various partnership firms, where he is a partner. He has also dividend income, interest income,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Rashid Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jul-30-1997
Criminal
Official Secrets' Act, 1923 - Sections 13(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 124A and 153A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 156(3)
1998CriLJ26; 1997(3)WLC477; 1997(2)WLN183
P.R. Patel, P.P. and; B.S. Bhati, Adv.
ORDERB.J. Shethna, J. 1. Heard the learned counsel Shri Khan for the petitioner and Shri Patel and Shri Bhati for the Respondent State.2. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 28-6-1997 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd., Pali Vs. State and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-22-1997
Electricity
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Electricity Act, 1910
AIR1998Raj15; 1997(1)WLN555
G.M. Bhandari and; P.R. Patel, Advs.
ORDER1. Both these petitions are disposed of by this common order as the common question for decision is involved in these matters.2. Writ Petition No. 2924/90 is filed by the petitioner Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPraduman Ranchhodbhai Patel Vs. Inspecting Assistant
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Jan-03-1995
Direct Taxation
(1995)52TTJ(Ahd.)549
assessed on substantive basis in respect of cash seized from him and revenue precluded from initiating proceeding against employer firm.Order of assessing officer was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue where assessee was assessed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDy. Cit Vs. Raja Udayshankar
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Oct-28-2005
Land Acquisition
(2006)7SOT680(Bang.)
The revenue has filed these appeals against consolidated order of the Commissioner of income-tax (Appeals)-I, Bangalore dated 18-4-2002 in the case of all the four assessees. Since issues involved are the same, therefore, all these four...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.G.R. Enterprises Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT
Jun-28-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)112TTJ(Bang.)377
1. This is an appeal by the assessee, a partnership firm, directed against the order of block assessment passed by the AO under Section 143(3) r/w Section 158BC of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShahabuddIn Abdul Kahlik Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India
Apr-05-1995
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3
JT1995(3)SC456; 1995(2)SCALE647; 1995Supp(2)SCC441; [1995]3SCR200
Anip Sachthey, Adv.
M.K. Mukherjee, J.1. On February 1, 1995 we heard and disposed of this appeal with the following order:For the reasons to be stated later, the judgment of the Additional Designated Judge, Ahmedabad dated 4th March, 1994...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Kumar JaIn Vs. Asstt. Cit
Delhi
Apr-23-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)89TTJ(Del)203
ORDERPhool Singh, J.M.All the aforesaid eight appeals arise out of different orders passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) in this group of cases and as most of the issues are common, these appeals were heard together...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh @ Raju Chandulal Gandhi Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Jul-05-2000
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25(1); Bombay Police Act - Sections 135(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 374; Indian penal Code - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 452 and 506(2)
(2000)3GLR2586
K.P. Raval, APP, for Respondent No. 1
J.N. Bhatt, J. 1. Whether, the appellants are guilty and responsible for the, ghastly and macabre, killing of deceased Girish Namdar or not, is the central theme, in this conviction appeal under section 374 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »