Advanced Search Results

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 23(1), 26, 28, 29, 31, 37, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49, 51, 58, 59 to 112, 125, 126, 127, 128 to 151, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 and 158; Constitution of India - Articles 13-010, 19(1), 19-045, 133, 141, 166(3) and 226; Development Control Rules, 1982 - Rules 1.3, 5, 6.1.1 and 13.5; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1931; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12-A, 18 and 54; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37-I and 269(UA); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3 to 20, 21 to 58, 159, 253, 254, 255 and 481; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1951 - Sections 1 to 7; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 51 and 52;

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Venugopol, Spl. C., ;C.J. Sawant, Adv. ;Gen., R.D. Rane, A.G.P., ;D.Y. Chandrachud, A.S.G., ;R.G. Ketkar, Adv., ;Harish Salve, Sr. A., ;V.R. Dhond, ;M.J. Dabholkar, Advs., ;P.C. Madkholkar, Adv.,

ORDERB.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These two petitions are in the nature of public interest litigation, the first at the instance of a journalist from Pune and the second at the instance of a Corporator of Pune Municipal...

Kapil P. Mohmed Vs. S. Anthony

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (CPCP), 1908 - Sections 2(2), 9 and 9A - Order 7 - Rule 10 , Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 1984(2)BomCR199

Advocate for Respondent : P.R. Naidu, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;Kaiser Shroff, A.G.P., for respondent No. 2

Sharad Manohar, J.1. This contempt processing was required to be instituted on account of the gross kind of contempt which, according to the respondent, he is entitled to commit by telling the Court that he is...

Shankar K. Thavare Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Revenue Recovery Act

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ846Bom

Advocate for Respondent : Hemant Gokhale, Adv. for Respondents 1 to 3 and ;P.R. Naidu, Adv. for Respondents 4 and 5

S.M.Daud, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks a direction to enforce the award made in favour of the petitioner in application No. (IDA) 399 of 1982.2. Respondent No. 5 was running a...

Goutam Singh and ors. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

R.A. Sharma, J.1. As in both these appeals, the question involved is the same, namely, the quantum of Court fee to be paid in a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

Zahida NizamuddIn Jalal and ors. Vs. Abidali Jafferali Syyed and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 94, 115 and 115(1) - Order 38, Rules 2, 3 and 6 - Order 43, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) Amendment Act, 1999

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR206; 2003(2)BomCR374; 2002(4)MhLj913

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. The petitioners challenge the order dated 7th August, 2002 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Kalyan District -Thane under Exh. 40 in Reg. Civ. Suit No. 471 of 1998. By the...

Shivaji Krishna Zunjare Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance, Re-development) Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 37(2); Greater Mumbai Development Control Regulations - Regulation 33(10)

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR133; 2004(4)MhLj764

Advocate for Respondent : Pradip Jadhav, AGP for respondent No. 1 and 2, ;S.G. Surana, Adv. for respondent No. 3, ;G.S. Hegde, Adv. for respondent No. 6 and ;P.R. Naidu, Adv. for respondent No. 7

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents waive service. By consent taken up for hearing and final disposal.2. Both these petitions are directed against an order passed by the Slum...

T.G. Srinivasa Murthy, Etc., Etc. Vs. Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. Etc., E ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25F; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 58; Societies Registration Act; Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act, 1976 - Sections 7(1); Jammu & Kashmir Societies Registration Act, 1898; Indian Contract Act - Sections 23; General Clauses Act - Sections 16; Industrial Employment Standing Orders Act; Bihar Shops and Establishments Act, 1953; Karnataka Private Educational Institutes (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975 - Sections 6; Bharat Earth Movers Limited Service Rules - Rules 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 and 17.2; Hindustan Machine Tools (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules - Rule 20.1; Karnataka Agro-Industries Corporation Limited (Recruitment and Promotion) Rules - Rule 2.21; Indian Railway Establ

Reported in : ILR1982KAR622; (1982)ILLJ268Kant

Rama Jois, J.1. Three important questions arise for consideration in these four writ petitions. They are : 1. Whether, (i) The Bharat Farth Movers Limited; (ii) The Hindustan Machine Tools Limited; (iii) The Karnataka Agro Industries...

Bhanwarlal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1985)ILLJ111Raj

G.M. Lodha J.1. Durante bene placito' ruled the world with waves of 'laissez faire' up to 19th century, Political as well as Industrial revolutions brought new tides of workers emancipation from exploitation resulting in new concepts...

C.P. Mathew Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 226 and 311

Reported in : (1983)ILLJ84Mad

1. The petitioner joined the services of the second respondent, Hindustan Photo Films Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (for short the Management) as early as in 1961 as a Technical officer. In 1976 he was promoted as Works...

The Management of Eid Parry (India) Ltd., Ranipet, Rep. by Its General ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Madras High Court Appellate side Rules - Rules 2A and B; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 7, 7(4)

Reported in : [2001(88)FLR490]; (2001)2MLJ708

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Subject-matter of this appeal is the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court whereby the learned single Judge has rejected a W.M.P. filed by the original writ-petitioner/appellant herein, the Management of...