Advanced Search Results

The State of Bihar and ors. Vs. Bhabapritananda Ojha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1959SC1073; [1959]Supp2SCR624

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. R. Das

S.K. DAS, J.1.This is an appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Patna dated October 9, 1953, in Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 181 of 1953 of that Court. It relates to a...

Jayanti Sahu and ors. Vs. Rama Chandra Behera and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2000)ACC389; 2001ACJ506; 89(2000)CLT430

Advocate for Respondent : A.K. Pradhan and ;B.P.R. Das, Advs.

D.M. Patnaik, J.1. The legal heirs of one Dharanidhar Sahu, the deceased, have approached this court in appeal being dissatisfied with the amount of compensation awarded by the 2nd Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Berhampur.2. Claimants' case...

Albert Judah Judah Vs. Rampada Gupta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11 - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 7, Rules 1 and 7 - Order 23, Rule 1(3) - Order 39, Rule 1; ;Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 34, 76(3), 78, 79, 79(2), 86 and 86F; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 65; ;Trusts Act, 1882 - Section 94; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 110, 166, 169, 290 and 293; ;Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Section 2(7); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 106

Reported in : AIR1959Cal715,[1960]30CompCas582(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : S.H. Bose, Adv. General, ;H.N. Sanyal, Addl. Solicitor General, ;P.R. Das, ;R.C. Deb, ;Arun Mukherji and ;Maya Roy, Advs.

P.C. Mallick, J.1. This is a suit in which the plaintiff seeks to establish his title to a bunch of 26752 ordinary shares in the defendant company. The Company and one Ramapada Gupta in whose name...

Deep Chandra Vs. Ruknuddaula Shamsher Jang Nawab Mohammad Sajjad Ali K ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 55(2)

Reported in : AIR1951All93

Advocate for Respondent : P.R. Das, ;S.N. Katju and ;Wahid Ahmad Khan, Advs.

Seth, J.1. This Full Bench reference is the outcome of disagreement between the learned Judges composing the Bench, which heard an appeal against a decree of the Civil Judge of Muzaffarnagar at Meerut, dismissing a suit...

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(1)(f), 19(2), 19(5), 19(6), 19(6), 20, 20(2), 21, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3), 22(4), 23, 24, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 26, 26, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 31, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 31(2A), 31(2B), 31(3), 31(4), 31(5), 31(5), 31(6), 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31B, 31C, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(4), 33, 34, 35, 35, 37, 38, 39, 39(B), 39, 39, 39(C), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 46(1), 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 56(1), 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 62, 64, 66, 68, 69, 72, 73, 73(1), 73(2), 74, 75, 75(1), 75(4), 76, 76(2), 77(2), 79, 83, 83(2), 85, 85(1), 88, 89, 100, 102(1), 103(1), 103(3)

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

1. I propose to divide my judgment into eight parts. Part I will deal with Introduction; Part II with interpretation of Golakhnath case; Part III with the interpretation of the original Article 368, as it existed...

Kamalnarayan Ramsaranlal Vs. Ram Kishorelal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 35, 45, 64 and 90; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 8, 10, 11 and 14

Reported in : AIR1958MP246

Advocate for Respondent : D.T. Mangalmurti, ;N.B. Chandurkar, ;W.M. Mukasdar and ;R.K. Pande, Advs.

1. The appellant Kamalnarayan was the defendant in the Court below. The present suit was filed by the two respondents Ram-kishorelal and Ramamijlal for a declaration that the defendant Kamalnarayan had committedbreaches of a public trust...

The State of Bihar Vs. Maharajadhiraja Sir Kameshwar Singh of Darbhang ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80

Reported in : [1952]1SCR889

Patanjali Sastri, C.J.1. These appeals and petitions which fall into three groups raise the issue of the constitutional validity of three State enactments called The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Bihar Act XXX of 1950), The...

The Jupiter General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajagopalan and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : InsuranceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 5, 6, 8, 9, 13(2), 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 31, 31(2), 39 and 226; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 45; Constitutional Law; Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 52A to 52G; Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1952P& H9

Advocate for Respondent : Chaudhry,; Ved Vyas and; Inder Dev Dua, Advs.

Harnam Singh, J. 1. This order disposes of Civil Miscellaneous (Writs) Nos. 17, 18 and 19 of 1951.2. Briefly summarised, the material facts are these. On the 17th of February, 1951, respondent No. 1 gave notice...

SerajuddIn and Co. Vs. Michael Golodetz and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 107 and 151; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 1, 14, 16, 31 and 34; ;Indian Arbitration (Protocol) Act, 1937

Reported in : AIR1960Cal47,63CWN717

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General and ;S. Chowdhuri, Adv.

P.N. Mookerjee, J.1. In this appeal, which arises out of an application under Section 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act and in which the plaintiff-appellant Serajuddin and Co. seeks reversal of an order of stay of...

Mati Lal Daga and ors. Vs. (Sri Sri) Iswar Radha Damodar Chandra Jew T ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyContract

Reported in : AIR1936Cal727

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Brojo Lal Chakravarti

D.N. Mitter, J.1. This is an appeal by defendants 5 to 9 against a preliminary judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Asansol dated 28th September 1932 by which he directed certain enquiry as to damages as...