Advanced Search Results

Alagammai Alias Indirani and anr. Vs. Managing Director, Marudhu Pandi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicle

Reported in : 1997ACJ1323

Advocate for Respondent : P. Pandi, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The claimants in M.C.O.P. Nos. 638 of 1985 and 639 of 1985 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tiruchirapalli are the appellants in the above appeals.2. C.M.A. No. 617 of...

P.K. Easwaran and ors. Vs. M. Kuppuswami and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1989)1MLJ390

Swamikkannu, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by defendants 4, 5, 6 and 7, Easwaran, Shanmugham, Sachithanandam and Kaliannan, against the judgment and decree dated 26th June, 1981, in O.S. No. 395 of 1980 on the...

K. Andavar and anr. Vs. Pandiyan Roadways Corporation Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1988)ACC148

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. Pandi

S. Swamikkannu, J.1. The appellants are the parents of the deceased who had died at the very spot of the accident. It is vehemently contended on behalf of the petitioners/appellants by Mr. R. Balasubramanian, learned Counsel...

The Corporation of Madurai Through the Executive Authority, Commission ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1982)2MLJ112

S. Mohan, J.1. The second appeal arises out of O.S. No. 897 of 1972 on the file of the District Munsif of Madurai Town, in which the respondent-plaintiff sought a declaration that the notice for demolition...

Savitri Devi Vs. Fashion Linkers and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 26

Reported in : 1995IIAD(Delhi)569; 1995(34)DRJ188; 1995RLR491

Usha Mehra, J. (1) The defendants M/s Fashion Linkers & Ors. by this application want this court to hold that the evidence recorded by the local commissioner is neither sustainable nor tenable in law. The grounds...

Marudhu Pandiyar Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Perumal and 2 ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 156, 166 and 166(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994

Reported in : I(1997)ACC183; 1996(2)CTC595; (1996)IIMLJ633

ORDERAR. Lakshmanan. J.1. The order in C.R.P.No.1820 of 1992 was passed by me on 20.9.1996. Applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in the decision reported in Vinod Gurudas Raikar v. National Insurance Co....

Lala Raj Kishore and ors. Vs. District Board of Seharanpur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh District Boards Act, 1922 - Sections 106, 174(1), 174(2) and 186; Constitution of India - Articles 13(1), 19(1), 226 and 265

Reported in : AIR1954All675

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Pandy, Adv.

ORDERM.L. Chaturvedi, J.1. This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution by eight persons, who own machine, for hulling rice, or a flour mill, or an oil crusher or a sugar-cane crusher. Respondent No....

State of Tamilnadu Vs. Poovan Chettiar and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Treasure-Trove Act, 1878 - Sections 3, 4, 8, 9, 17 and 20; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1997Mad312

Advocate for Respondent : P. Pandi, Adv.

1. Defendant-State of Tamil Nadu represented by the District Collector. Tiruchirapalli, is the appellant in this second appeal. Plaintiff, respondent herein, filed O.S. No. 200 of 1978, on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Kulithalai,...

A.A.A. Kotchadainaidu and Another Vs. Akkayanaicker

Court : Chennai

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963; Constitution of India -- Articles 136, 182 and 183; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 48 and 49

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC18; (1998)IMLJ666

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. Pandi, Adv.

ORDER1. The respondent filed the suit in O.S.No.322 of 1972 on the file of thelearned District Munsif, Uttamapalayam against the petitioners seeking adecree for a sum of Rs. 18,912 being the principal and interest due on...

Vaiyapuri Vs. M. Sundaresan and 10 Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 45, 69 and 69(2) and (3)

Reported in : AIR2002Mad28; (2001)3MLJ219

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. V.K. Muthusamy, ;Senior Counsel for Mr. P. Pandi, ;Mr. V. Radhakrishnan and ;Mr. S.T.S. Murthy, Advs.

ORDER1. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No. 221 of 1979 by the subordinate Judge, Karur on 14.8.1984.2. The sixth defendant is the appellant herein.3. The plaint averments are summarised as...