Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: p n palit · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.191 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 09 2003

Bimal Chandra Mitra Vs. Nemai Palit

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-09-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 107; ;Calcutta Thika Tenancy (Acquistion and Regulation) Act, 1981

Reported in : (2003)3CALLT511(HC),2004(1)CHN289

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Palit, Senior Adv., ;M. Thakur, Adv. and ;C.S. Bhattacharya, Adv. for Defendant No. 1

Narayan Chandra Sil, J. 1. The plaint case in brief is that Rabindra Nath Mukherjee and his brother Nemai Mukherjee being the owners of undivided one third share in premises No. 24/1A, Balaram Ghosh Street, Calcutta...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2010

Dilip Hazra Vs. Smt. Jagatmaya Neogi and ors

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Decided on : Nov-25-2010

Subject : Tenancy

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. N. Palit; Mr. N. R. Ghosh, Advs

1. These three applications are at the instance of the defendants in the respective title appeals bearing nos.40 of 2002, 41 of 2002 and 42 of 2002 and are directed against the order no.22 dated March...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 1990

Sudhangshu Mohan Deb Vs. Smt. Nirode Sundari Deb Dhupi and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-17-1990

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144 - Order 39, Rule 1

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Palit, Adv.

Srivastava, J. 1. This is plaintiff's revision against the judgment and order dt. 30-6-1983 passed by the learned District Judge, West Tripura, whereby the plaintiff's appeal against the order dt. 30-5-1982 passed by the learned Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 13 1992

Mrs. A.K. Augustine Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-13-1992

Subject : Service

Acts : Calcutta University First Ordinances, 1979 - Ordinance 35 and 35(2)

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT308(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Chatterjee and ;Sandip Srimani, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;Pradip Tarafder, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

Haridas Das, J.1. The petitioner Mrs. A. K. Augustine has in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayed for issue of a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto commanding the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1999

Joyita Saha Vs. Rajesh Kumar Pandey

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-05-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 7; ;Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 15 and 16; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34

Reported in : AIR1999Cal109

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Palit and ;Santi Roy, Advs.

Mitra, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by an unfortunate girl who, though was born with a golden spoon in her mouth because of her own follies, not only suffered herself, but also lowered down...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1995

Hindustan Lever Ltd. and anr. Vs. State Consumer Redressal Forum and o ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-15-1995

Subject : ConsumerCivil

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(2A), 16, 18, 18A, 29A; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13(3) and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : (1996)1CALLT254(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Palit, Adv.

Samaresh Banerjea, J.1. In the instant writ application the writ petitioner Company has challenged the ad interim order dated 28th June 1995 passed by the State Consumer Dispute Commission, West Bengal being the respondent No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2011

Arya Samaj, Kolkata and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-01-2011

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Krishna Nanda Mukhopadhyay; Mr. Tapabrata Chakraborty; Mr. P.S. Deb Barman; Mr. Tapabrata Chakraborty; Mr. P.N. Palit; Mr. P.S. Bhattacharya; Mr. S.S. Koley, Advs.

1. W.P. 1163 of 2008 dated July 1, 2008, is at the instance of Arya Samaj and its Secretary as well as by the Managing Committee of Raghumal Arya Vidyalaya (hereafter the said Institution) and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1981

Chandra Sekhar Sarkar Vs. Baidyanath Ghosh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-09-1981

Subject : Limitation

Acts : West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1956 - Section 8; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

Reported in : AIR1982Cal6,86CWN111

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Palit, Adv.

ORDERSudhindra Mohan Guha, J. 1. The petitioner herein is the applicant for pre-emption under Section 8 of the Land Reforms Act in respect of the land purchased by the opposite parties on the ground of vicinage....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1979

Hundraj Mariwalla Vs. Additional District Magistrate (L.R.) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-18-1979

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 3 and 15; ;West Bengal Minor Minerals Rules, 1973 - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1980Cal3

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Palit, Adv.

ORDERDipak Kumar Sen, J.1. Hundraj Mariwalla, the petitioner, herein carries on the business of manufacturing of bricks. For such manufacture the petitioner obtains ordinary earth from 4.22 acres of land under different plots under different khatians...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1976

Raipada Pramanik Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-03-1976

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299(1); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 106

Reported in : AIR1977Cal7

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Roychowdhury and ; P.N. Palit, Advs.

B.C. Ray, J. 1. This appeal by the plaintiff appellant is directed against the judgment and order passed in Title Suit No. 62 of 1966 and it arises out of a proceeding for passing a decree...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial