Advanced Search Results

Tara Chand Vs. Ishwar Dass and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 111; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 to 101

Reported in : AIR1982HP29

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Nag, Adv.

Vyom Prakash Gupta, J.1. S/Shri Ishwar Dass and Om Prakash filed a suit for possession in respect to the property mentioned in the plaint on the allegations that they are the owners of tha disputed property...

Khem Chand Vs. Romesh Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 11; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 58 and 63; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 98

Reported in : AIR1985HP37

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Nag, Adv.

H.S. Thakur, J. 1. The only contention which has been raised by the learned counsel for the appellant in this appeal is that the courts below have gravely erred in holding that the suit was barred...

Ram Asra and ors. Vs. Smt. Chinti and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1953 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1986HP55

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Nag, Adv.

H.S. Thakur, J. 1. The dispute between the parties relates to a small area of land, measuring 4 marlas. The appellants (hereinafter to be referred to as the 'plaintiffs') instituted a suit in the Court of...

S.C. Dogra and Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Himachal Minor Minerals (Concession) Revised Rules, 1971 - Rule 24; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Mines and Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 15 and 30

Reported in : AIR1984HP29

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Nag, Adv. General,; M.S. Guleria, Asstt. Adv. General and;

ORDERV.P. Gupta, J.1. These three writ petitions can conveniently be disposed of by a single judgment, as questions of facts and law involved in these writ petitions are similar.2. For understanding the facts and the matters...

Shakuntala Sharma Vs. Maya Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1992(23)DRJ418; 1992RLR298

P.N. Nag, J. (1) Counsel for the petitioner submits that two suits - one filed before the Sub Judge, Delhi and the other filed in this High Court - are exactly similar and based on same...

Maharani Ram Sundari Vs. the State Himachal Pradesh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estate and Land Reform Act, 1953 - Sections 2(5)

Reported in : 7(1971)DLT64

T.V.R. Tatachari (1) This second appeal has been filed by Maharani Kamsandari of Dharbhanga, resident of Village Chharabra, Tehsil Kasumpti, Mahasu District, Himachal Pradesh under Section 104 read with section 12 of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition...

Smt. Saroj Bala Vs. Rajive Stock Brokers Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 30, 31(3) and 34; Limitation Act

Reported in : 2005(3)ARBLR162(Delhi); 118(2005)DLT472; 2005(81)DRJ143

Advocate for Respondent : None

T.S. Thakur, J.1. The respondent company is a member of the National Stock Exchange while the petitioner is a constituent who deals in stocks and shares. Disputes between the petitioner and the respondent company having arisen,...

Smt. Giano Devi Vs. Mangal Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100

Reported in : AIR1985HP82

Advocate for Respondent : Chhabil Dass, Adv.

H.S. Thakur, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the decree and judgment of the learned Single Judge (M. R. Ansari, J.), dated May 19, 1970. The appellant in the present appeal is the defendant...

Jayshree Ravi and Another Vs. University of Delhi and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 16(2), 19, 20, 21, 22(2), 36 to 51 and 226; Passport Act, 1967 - Sections 10(3); Delhi University Act, 1922

Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ303

Advocate for Respondent : V.P. Choudhary, Sr. Adv. and ; Ms. Sushma Sachdev, Adv.

ORDERMahinder Narain, J.1. Rule D. B.2. By consent of parlies, we have heard the matter on merits.3. By this writ petition, Jayashree Ravi and Anil Kaushal question the legality and virus of a condition imposed by...

Amar Pal Singh Vs. Election Commission of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Delhi High Court Rules - Rule 10; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 58-A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 329; Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 - Sections 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 98; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 108

Reported in : AIR1993Delhi316; 50(1993)DLT643; 1993(26)DRJ393

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. G. Ramasway, Attorney General, ; Mr. Ashish Wad, ; Mr.

ORDER1. The petitioner filed this petition, seeking a writ for quashing the order dated 21 -5-1991, passed by the Chief Election Commissioner, countermanding the election in 80 Meerut Parliamentary Constituency and also for quashing the order...