Advanced Search Results

Klassic Construction (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Army Welfare Housing Organisation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Society Registration Act, 1860

Reported in : AIR2006SC2430; 2006(2)ARBLR432(SC); JT2006(7)SC231; 2006(6)SCALE325; (2006)9SCC688

Advocate for Respondent : Arvind Kumar Tewari, Adv.

1. Heard Mr. P.N. Kumar, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Arvind Kumar Tewari, learned Counsel for the respondent. The appellant before us is a contractor. The respondent is the Army Welfare Housing Organisation represented...

Housing and Urban Development Corporation Vs. Dsa Engineers (Bombay) a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 30 and 32; Arbitration (Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 4, 10 and 34; Arbitration (Amendment) Act, 1985 - Sections 85, 85(1) and 85(2); Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937; Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961; Contract Act - Sections 28; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT656

Advocate for Respondent : Chetan Sharma, ; D. Moitra and ; B.S. Shukla, Advs.

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. This petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for filing of the award dated 30.6.2001 has been thrown up interesting question of law - whether the provisions of Act of 1940...

S. Nagaraja and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131, 226 and 262; ;Inter State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 5; River Boards Act, 1956 - Sections 4(4)

Reported in : 2003(2)KarLJ88

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. The prayers sought for in this writ petition are.--(a) To declare the Inter Water Dispute Act, 1956 and the River Boards Act, 1956 are void and unconstitutional, the legislation traversing beyond Article...

Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association and Another Vs. Union of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 32, 39-A, 50, 51, 53, 73, 74, 103, 112(3), 113(1), 121, 124(2), 125, 127, 128, 129, 130, 137, 139(A), 141, 143, 145, 146, 147, 148, 154(1), 163, 166(3), 167, 169, 202(3), 211, 214, 215, 216, 217(1), 221(2) 222, 224, 226, 229(2) 231(2), 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 280, 316(1), 320, 324, 338(5), 344(1), 350-B and 356; Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 101; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 200(2) and 220(2); New Towns Act, 1966; Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Act, 1977; High Courts Act, 1861; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 101 and 102; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 40 - Order 46, Rule 1; Madras District Municipalities Act, 1920 - Sections 3; Constitution (Forth-Fourth) Amendment Act, 1978 - Article 22;

Reported in : AIR1994SC268; JT1993(5)SC497; (1993)4SCC441; [1993]Supp2SCR659

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.(for himself and on behalf of Yogeshwar Dayal, G.N. Ray, Dr. A.S. Anand & S.P. Bharucha, JJ.) :1. By and Order dated October 26,1990 passed in Subhash Sharma and Ors. and Anr. Union of...

Carborundum Universal Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220(2A); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : (1990)1CompLJ219(SC); (1989)80CTR(SC)85; 1989(25)LC466(SC); [1989]180ITR171(SC); JT1989(4)SC56; 1989(2)SCALE799; 1989Supp(2)SCC462; 1990(1)LC90(SC)

ORDER1. These two applications under Article 136 of the Constitution are directed against two separate orders made by the Central Board of Direct Taxes and communicated on 2nd March, 1987, declining to waive the demand of...

M/S. R. Murlidhar Reddy and Co. Vs. National Projects Construction Cor ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 29, 30 and 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 19, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1993Delhi68; 1992(2)ARBLR295(Delhi); 1992(23)DRJ334; 1992RLR288

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Kumar and ; Anurag Kumar, Advs.

ORDER1. The petitioner entered into a contract with the respondent for execution of a portion of the work of 'Contraction of Rajghat Masonary Dam and appurtenant works across the River Betwa at Rajghat, Lalitpur Distt. U.P.'...

Mambram Valiyattu Kammu, Kammu Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 44(1991)DLT75

S.B. Wad, J.(1) In this bunch of habeas corpus petitions, the detention orders are passed by the Kerala Government and the petitioners are in Kerala jails. We are of the considered opinion that these petitions ought...

D.S.A. Engineers (Bombay) Vs. Housing and Urban Development Corporatio ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2004(74)DRJ331

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Kumar and ; Anurag Kumar, Advs.

Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The petitioner herein was awarded a work contract for external services (plumbing) under agreement dated 10th June, 1992. Disputes arose between the parties out of and in connection with the aforesaid agreement...

Hakeem Abdul Rahiman @ Abdul Kareem Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2856; 58(1995)DLT844; 1995(33)DRJ234

M.J. Rao, C.J.(1) The detenu is detained in the State of Kerala. The detention order is passed by the State of Kerala. It is true that Section 9 declaration has been made by the Union of...

U.P. Samaj Co-operative Group Housing Society Vs. Delhi Cooperative Tr ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 99(2002)DLT692

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Kumar, Adv.

Khan, J.1. Petitioner is disputing membership of R-3 and calling in question orders passed by the Registrar and the Cooperative Tribunal respectively affirming his membership.2. Both sides are giving their own versions. The petitioner society asserts...