Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: p m shinde · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.091 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 19 2009

Prayagbai W/O Annasaheb Kadam, Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through It ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-19-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 12, 17 to 21 and 45(2); Contempt of Courts Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR408; 2009(111)BomLR1612; 2009(4)MhLj779

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shinde, Assistant Government Pleader

Naresh H. Patil, J.1. The appellants filed return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act 1961, as amended upto 1975, (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Ceiling Act'). According to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2007

Syed Babali S/O Sayed Lal, Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through P.P., ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 32 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 307 and 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107 and 161

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR1839

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shinde, A.P.P.

S.P. Kukday, J.1. Appellants are prosecuted for having committed murder of Digamber Shamrao Wankhede of Hadgaon, in furtherance of their common intention and for intentionally insulting and provoking him to commit breach of peace. They are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 2008

Aashabai Vilas Wagh and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-11-2008

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Sections 145(1A)

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR825; 2008(5)BomCR676

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, ;U.B. Bondar, Adv. for respondent No. 4 and ;D.P. Palodkar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 5 and 7 to 12

Patil Naresh H., J.1. Heard.2. Leave to delete respondent No. 6.3. Rule. By consent of the learned Counsel for the parties rule made returnable forth with and the matter is taken up for hearing.4. The petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 25 2009

Ashok Laxman Attarde and ors. Vs. Atmaram Bhanu Saindane and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 3(4); Constitution of India - Article 227; The Maharashtra Resettlement of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Rules, 1975 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR231

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Barlinge and ;Vijay B. Patil, Advs. in W.P. No. 365/2009, for respondent No. 1 and in W.P. No. 365/2009, for respondent Nos. 1 to 13 and ;P.M. Shinde, A.G.P. in W.P. No. 365/2009, for respondent

Gavai B.R., J.1. By way of Writ Petition No. 365/2009, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 3rd December 2008 passed by the learned Member of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, in Appeal TRB No. 197/B/2008,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2007

Namdeo Dashrath Shinde and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-16-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300, 302 to 307, 325 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CrCP) - Sections 161

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3147

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shinde, A.P.P.

S.P. Kukday, J.1. Appellant No. 3 is convicted for having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life. She is further convicted for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2001

Md. Ibrahim S/O Md. Vazir and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-03-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Recruitment) Rules, 1967 - Rule 1; Maharashtra Finance and Account Service Class II Recruitment Rules, 1971 - Rule 2

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR860; 2002(3)MhLj824

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shinde, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. By a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petition challenges the Constitutional validity of revised recruitment rules in respect of Maharashtra Finance and Accounts Service Class II brought...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2009

Shivajirao S/O Prataprao Chalukya Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-20-2009

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 27(3A), 73(1A) 73G and 73G(1); Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committees Rules, 1971 - Rules 4, 4(1), 4(4), 6, 6(5), 6(6), 6(7) and 7

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR1359

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;R.N. Dhorde and ;V.G. Sakolkar, Advs. for respondent No. 3 and ;V.D. Sapkal and ;L.C. Patil, Advs. for respondent No. 4

Naresh H. Patil, J.1. Heard.2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith.3. The petitioner challenges an order dated 1/1/2009 passed by Collector, Osmanabad rejecting objection petition filed by him to the provisional list of voters published for holding elections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 2001

Udhav Uttam Patil Vs. Daga Holkya Bhil Since Deceased Through L.Rs. an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-09-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to the Scheduled Tribes Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 4 and 7; Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to the Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5, 6, 7, 9, 9A, 10 and 10A; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 36, 36(2) and 242; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958; Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 84C; Limitation Act - Sections 4, 5, 12 and 14; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 45(2); Constitution of India - Article 46; Employees Provident Fund Act - Sections 14B

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR841; 2001(2)BomCR597; (2001)4BOMLR249; 2001(3)MhLj916

Advocate for Respondent : S.S. Shete, ;V.D. Sapkal, A.G.P. and ;P.M. Shinde, A.G.P.

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Rule. Respondents wave service. By consent of the parties, rule made returnable forthwith.2. This group of petitions raises a common challenge regarding the right of the Divisional Commissioner to reopen the inquiry already...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2007

Chandrakant S/O Balkrishnarao Phatale Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Rules 48A(4), 66, 66(1) and 66(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR239; 2007(4)MhLj84

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3

P.R. Borkar, J.1. This is a petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by an employee of Judicial Department working in Nanded District whose application dated 5-9-2000 for withdrawal of notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2007

Mega Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-06-2007

Subject : Contract

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 73; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2007Bom156; 2007(2)ALLMR547; 2007(4)BomCR732; 2008(1)CTLJ120(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1 in W.P. No. 607 and 624/2007, ;B.L. Sagar Killarikar, Adv. for Respondent No. 2, ;V.H. Dighe, AGP for Respondent No. 1 in W.P. No. 623/2007 and ;Girish Kulkarn

1. Since all these petitions raise a common question, all these petitions are being decided by this common order. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners questioning the terms of the notice inviting tender, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial