Advanced Search Results

Shivabhai Jijidas Patel (Decd.) Through His Heirs Vs. Chandrashekhar R ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1994)1GLR501

B.S. Kapadia, J.1. Mr. Yatin Soni, learned Advocate for the respondent has argued this matter two days in instalments and he covered major part of his arguments. However, today though the matter was called out repeatedly...

Bhadrabala Wd/O. Bhupendra Shelat Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1996)3GLR19

M.R. Calla, J.1. This Special Civil Application is directed against the order dated 14-9-1981 by the Legal Department of the Government of Gujarat in the matter of grant of pension to Shri B.J. Shelat, ex-Metropolitan Magistrate,...

State of Gujarat Vs. Polabhai Ajabhai (Decd.) Through His Heirs Gangab ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 37, 37(2) and 211; Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957 - Sections 9

Reported in : (2003)1GLR887

Advocate for Respondent : A.J. Patel and; Jaswant K. Shah, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1-1/3

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. The State of Gujarat has filed this Special Civil Application, challenging the order passed by the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal in Appeal No. TEN/AR-15 of 1994 dated 3rd January, 1995. By the impugned order,...

Om Prakash B. Khare Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code; ;Bombay Land Revenue Rules; ;Limitation Act - Sections 100; ;Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 - Rules 42 and 55; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999

Reported in : AIR2004Guj285

Advocate for Respondent : Government Pleader for Respondent No. 1-3,; Nilesh A. Pandya, Adv. for Respondent No. 4 and;

K.A. Puj, J. 1. This Appeal From Order is filed against the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Vadodara below an application Exh.5 in Special Civil Suit No. 1051 of 2001 whereby the injunction...

Puriben Manilal Patel (Decd.) Through Her Heirs Pramilaben Madhubhai P ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1992)1GLR751

S.D. Shah, J.1. Rule. Mr. Mangukia learned A.G.P. waives service of rule. With the consent of parties matter is heard finally today.The petitioners in these petitions are heirs and Legal Representatives of one deceased Puriben, wife...

Arlene Uday Heble Vs. Uday Laxman Heble

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Foreign Marriages Act, 1969 - Sections 15; Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 27(1)

Reported in : 1995(4)BomCR219

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Bhatt, Adv.

A.V. Savant, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the wife-Arlene Heble against the Judgment and Decree dated 27th April, 1983 passed by the Family Court, Bombay, in Petition No. A-85/90. The said petition was filed...

State of Gujarat Vs. Amrish Jagmohan Parikh and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : LimitationTenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 2(2), 2(5), 2(6), 63, 76, 76A and 84C; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Bombay Revenue Tribunal Act, 1957 - Sections 32G(2) and 32P

Reported in : AIR1997Guj71

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Bhatt and; A.Y. Kogje, Advs.

ORDERJ.N. Bhatt, J. 1. Whether the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal, Ahmedabad, has committed serious error of law in refusing to condone the delay of three years and seven days in filing revision application under Section 76 of...

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Ambuja Motors

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3292

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Bhatt, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

D.P. Buch, J. 1. The petitioners above named have preferred this petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short `the Code') challenging the order dated 1st May, 1999, recorded by the...

Govardhandas Vallabhdas Vs. the Official Liquidator, Electro-metal Ref ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyCivil

Reported in : (1929)31BOMLR1209; 122Ind.Cas.836

Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. This appeal was opened to us as depending on the following question of law, viz., whether if a property is seized and attached and an order for sale made, an attaching creditor...

Dharamdas B. Katira and anr. Vs. O.P. Bhardwaj and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 1985(1)BomCR522

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Pandya and P.M. Bhatt, Advs. for respondent No. 1 and ;Manjula Rao, P.P. for respondent No. 2-State

A.D. Tated, J.1. The petitioners, who are accused in Criminal Case No. 1474/S of 1981 pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplanade, Bombay, filed this petition under section 482 Criminal Procedure Code and Article 227...