Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: p l jain and · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.313 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 26 1992

Madhya Pradesh State Road Trans. Corpn. Vs. Praveer Kumar Bhatnagar an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-26-1992

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1994ACJ579

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. Jain, Adv.

T.N. Singh, J. 1. This is owner's appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, (for short, 'the M.V. Act'), against an award of compensation of Rs. 20,000/- made in favour of claimant-respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2000

Princess Usha Trust Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-09-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)164CTR(MP)381

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. P.L. Jain

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.By this petition, filed under articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India the petitioner, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, claims following reliefs for the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75 :'An appropriate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2005

Saroop Singh Vs. Banto and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Evidence Act - Sections 107 and 108; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 64 and 65; Punjab Limitation (Customs) Act, 1920; Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920 - Sections 6; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144

Reported in : AIR2005SC4407; [2006(1)JCR36(SC)]; JT2005(9)SC200; (2006)142PLR783; 2005(8)SCALE415; (2005)8SCC330; 2006(1)LC1(SC)

S.B. Sinha, J.The first defendant in the suit is in appeal before us. The plaintiff- respondents filed a suit for possession and permanent injunction, being Suit No. 218 of 1994. One Shadi admittedly was the owner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 1991

Afsar HussaIn Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-19-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Passport Act, 1920 - Sections 12; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 18

Reported in : 44(1991)DLT282

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. S. Lal

V.B. Bansal, J. (1) By way of this application Afsar Husain petitioner has prayed for being released on bail in case R.C. No. 6 of 1989 Siu Xvi dated 23rd November, 1989 recorded by the C.BI....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1989

Gopaldas Agrawal and anr. Vs. Phoolchand Garg and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-31-1989

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 1990MPLJ440

Advocate for Respondent : K.L. Mangal, Adv. and ;B.S. Agarwal, Adv. for respondent No. 1

ORDERR.C. Lahoti, J.1. 'Judiciary is respected not on account of its powers to legalise injustice on technical grounds but because it is capable of removing injustice and is expected to do so.' (Collector, Land Acquisition v....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2001

Dr. Anil Kumar Haritwal and Others Vs. Sant Prakash Gupta and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 9, 138, 142 and 142-A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 190, 200 and 256; Evidence Act - Sections 60; General Clauses Act, 1997 - Sections 27; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)826; 2001(3)MPHT325; 2001(2)MPLJ488

ORDERFakhruddin, J. 1. This order shall govern the disposal of all the aforesaid three revision petitions.2. Cr. Revisions 344 and 412 of 2000 have been filed against the order dated 29-8-2000, passed by the Trial Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2001

Dr. Anil Kumar Haritwal and anr. Vs. Sant Prakash Gupta

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 142 and 142-A; Evidence Act - Sections 9 and 60; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 27; Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 190, 200 and 256

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3632

Advocate for Respondent : N.K. Modi and ;Sushil Chaturvedi, ;V. Sunderam and ;Surabhi Singh, Advs. ;Padam Singh, Addl. Govt. Adv.

Fakhruddin, J.1. This order shall govern the disposal of all the aforesaid three revision-petitions.2. Cri. Revn. 344 and 412 of 2000 have been filed against the order dated 29-8-2000, passed by the trial Court whereby the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1995

Vishal Kumar S/O Girdhar Gopal and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-06-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 39, 39(1) and 40; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 8 and 8(2)

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ659

Advocate for Respondent : K.B. Chaturvedi, Government Adv. and ;P.L. Jain, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

ORDERT.S. Doabia, J.1. An order passed under Sections 39 and 40 of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was subject matter of a writ petition bearing No. 117/89. This...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1994

Dulari Bai Vs. Rambabu and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-28-1994

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1995ACJ17

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. Jain and ; R.V. Sharma, Advs.

Shacheendra Dwivedi and Krishan Mohan Pandey, JJ.1. This appeal is by the claimant, the mother of the deceased, who had preferred a claim petition under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Claims Tribunal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1990

Madan Lal Vs. Chimman Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-24-1990

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1992ACJ535

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. Jain and ; K.B. Chaturvedi, Advs.

K.K. Verma, J.1. Counsel for the parties are heard on the merits of the revision petition.2. The claimant's mother Bundabai preferred a claim petition under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act on 25.2.1985, on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial