Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: p k rout · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.161 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 22 1993

State Vs. B. Satyanarayana and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-22-1993

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 244 and 258; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955 - Sections 16(1) and 20(1); Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 75(1993)CLT695; 1993(II)OLR80

Advocate for Respondent : Subash Ch. Lal and Mandholiwal

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Order of trial Court dropping the prosecution Under Section 268, Criminal Procedure Code is grievance of the prosecutor in this revision.Opposite parties were being prosecuted Under Section 16(1)(a)(i) read with Section 7(1) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2014

M/S.Kalinga Order Supplier, Rep.Through Its Prop.D Vs. State of Orissa ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-17-2014

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18418 of 2013 M/s. Kalinga Order Supplier, Repreented through its Proprietor, Damodar Karan, S/o. Purusottam Karan Baripada, Mayurbhanj .... Petitioner -VersusState of Orissa & 3 others. …....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1992

Yakub Mahammed and ors. Vs. Revenue Officer-cum-tahasildar and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-24-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Sections 37

Reported in : AIR1993Ori174

Advocate for Respondent : Addl. Standing Counsel

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. These two applications uner Article 226 of the Constitution arise out of a ceiling surplus proceeding under the Orissa Land Reforms Act.2. Petitioners are sons of Ibrahim. A suo motu proceeding was initiated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 26 2014

Binan Kumar Mohanty and Others Vs. Water and Land Management Institute ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-26-2014

Subject : Education

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK O.J.C. No.10093 of 2001 & W.P.(C) No.5643 of 2002 An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------In O.J.C. No.10093 of 2001 Binan Kumar Mohanty & others ………...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1999

Utkal Co-operative Banking Society Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-08-1999

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Orissa Co-operative Societies Act, 1963 - Sections 32(1) and 32(7)

Reported in : AIR2000Ori46

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Mohanty, Addl. Govt. Adv., ;R.K. Rath and ;N.R. Rout, Advs.;B.R. Sarangi and ;P.K. Rout, Advs.

R.K. Patra, J.1. The Utkal Cooperative Banking Society Limited represented through its Secretary has filed this writ petition challenging the validity of the Order No. 188 (Conf.)/ BK. 5 dated 30-12-1998 (Annexure-6) of the Registrar, Co-operative...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2004

Umakanta Sahoo Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-01-2004

Subject : Service

Reported in : 97(2004)CLT709

Advocate for Respondent : Addl. Govt. Adv. for Opp. Party No. 1, ;S.K. Misra, D.P. Nanda, P.K. Mohapatra and M.K. Pati for Opp. Parties 2 to 4, J.K. Rath, S.N. Rath, P.K. Rout, C.K. Rajguru and D.N. Rath for Opp. Party No. 5

P.K. Mohanty, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer :'Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court would graciously be pleased to issue Rule Nisi calling upon the opposite parties to show...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2003

ispat Labour Union, Steel Employees Association and Dillip Kumar Mohap ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-09-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Verification of Membership and Recognition of Trade Unions Rules, 1994 - Rules 11 and 12

Reported in : 97(2004)CLT194

Advocate for Respondent : B. Mishra, ;Kamal Ray and ;A.K. Baral, Advs. for O.P. No. 3, ;Prasant Ku. Mohanty and ;Manoj Kumar Panda, Advs. for O.P. No. 4, ;B.R. Saranji, ;P.K. Rout and ;P.K. Kar, Advs. for O.P. 5, ;Manoj Kumar

L. Mohapatra, J.1. Ispat Labour Union, Rourkela, a registered Trade Union, has filed W.P.(C) No. 2465 of 2003 challenging the notice dated 3.3.2003 in Annexure-4 passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner and Returning Officer, Rourkela issuing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 1993

Orissa Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Sudhansu Se ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-23-1993

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108 and 111; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR1994Ori158

Advocate for Respondent : Adv. General, ;P.K. Rout Addl. Standing Counsel and ;Bidyadhar Misra, Adv.

A.K. Padhi, J. 1. The Orissa Fisheries Development Corporation, defendant No. 1 in Title Suit No. 1 of 1966 is the appellant in First Appeal No. 66 of 1974. State of Orissa through the Collector, Cattack,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2000

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mitradatta Mishra and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-26-2000

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168

Reported in : 2002ACJ113; AIR2000Ori184

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Padhi, S. Parida and Miss D. Mohapatra, ;S.R. Patnaik and P.K. Rout

R.K. Patra, J. 1. The aforesaid two appeals filed at the instance of the insurance company are directed against the common judgment dated 6-10-1993 passed in Misc, Case Nos. 637 and 640 of 1990 by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1994

Smt. Diptilata Panigrahi Etc. Vs. Land Acquisition Collector, Balasore ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-06-1994

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23 and 54

Reported in : AIR1995Ori294

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Ray, Adv. General and ;P.K. Rout, Addl. Standing Counsel, ;A. Ch. Panda, ;A. Mohapatra, ;H.N. Malla and ;D. Pradhan, Adv.

S.C. Mohapatra, J. 1. These two cross-appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), one'by claimant and the other by the Company for whom the land was acquired,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial