Advanced Search Results

Union of India Through Senior Divisonal Officer, South Eastern Railway ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1477; [2008(2)JCR113(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : M.M. Pal, Amicus Curiae

ORDERD.G.R. Patnaik, J.1. The short question which calls for determination in this writ application is, whether placement of the respondent in the post of Khalashi Helper from the post of Trolley Shed Khalashi in the same...

Mahakal Automobiles and anr. Vs. Kishan Swaroop Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21, Rules 22, 50, 54, 54(1A), 58, 66, 66(2) and 67; Madhya Pradesh Civil Court Rules, 1961

Reported in : AIR2008SC2061; 2008(2)AWC1859(SC); 2008(6)SCALE163; 2008AIRSCW2730; 2008(2)LH(SC)1444; 2008(3)ICC490

Advocate for Respondent : S.K. Dubey, Sr. Adv., ; Sunil Goyal, ; Sumant Bhardwaj,

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench.2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:Respondent had sold 7200 sq.ft. land...

Most. Parbati Devi and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR539(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Modi, G.P-1 and; Sunil Kumar, Adv. for respondent Nos. 3 and 4

ORDERR.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. Pradip Modi appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Sunil Kumar appearing on behalf of the Respondents No. 3 and 4 (hereinafter...

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Orissa Ceramic Industries Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)LC129Tri(Delhi)

1. The issue involved in this appeal is whether the refund claim of the Respondent is barred by limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. The Respondent Company, a small scale...

Ghanaram (Engineers and Contractors) Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT57

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Shashank Shekhar

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. In this intra-Court appeal preferred under Section 2 (1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 the defensibility of the order dated 12-8-2008 passed by the learned Single Judge...

Bal Kishan Vs. Sat Parkash Sood

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(3) and 15(5)

Reported in : (1994)106PLR71

S.S. Sodhi, J.1. The challenge here is to the order of ejectment passed against the tenant on the ground that the landlord required the premises for his personal use and occupation.2. The demised premises are part...

General Manager, North Eastern Railway and Others Vs. Bajranglal Jhunj ...

Court : Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna

Subject : MRTP

A.N. Chaturvedi, President: 1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 15.11.1994 passed by District Forum, Samastipur in Complaint Case No. 8/92. By the impugned order the District Forum held that the complainant was entitled...