Advanced Search Results

Azizus Subhan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Through the Secy., Ministry of ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 363(1) and 366(22); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11; ;Crown Grants Act, 1885 - Section 3; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1966Cal570

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Banerjee, Adv. for No. 2, ;P.N. Chunder and ;Indhir Kumar Mondel, Advs. for No. 1

B.C. Mitra, J.1. This appeal is directed against an order of Banerjee, J. dated June 22, 1965, rejecting the appellants application for a Rule Nisi in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The only...

Union of India & Anr vs.swati Srivastava

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.8542/2017 Date of Decision:10. h October, 2017. ....... Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Versus Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.R.R. Sinha, Jt....

Chattar Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR1953P& H239

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Sikri, Adv. General

Kapur, J.1. This is a rule directed against the State Government under Article 226 to show cause why a writ of 'mandamus' should not be issued in regard to the contract entered into between the petitioner...

Naresh Chandra Sanyal Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ; States Merger (West Bengal) Order, 1949

Reported in : AIR1952Cal757,56CWN539

Advocate for Respondent : Bhabesh Narain Bose and ; S.K. Guha, Advs. for Opposite Parties (Nos. 2 to 4)

ORDERBose, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for an appropriate 'Writ for quashing of certain orders passed by the Authorities of the Assam Railway against the petitioner reducing the petitioner from...

Golam Rasul Vs. Public Service Commission and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1963)IILLJ174Cal

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner, Golam Rasul, was a driver of a motor vehicle under the Public Service Commission, Went Bengal. On 16 December 1958, the petitioner was charged with misconduct as hereinbelow set out:'Whereas it...

Hasimara Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Company Law Board and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ50

ORDERSankar Prasad Mitra, C.J.1. In an application under Article 226 of that Constitution, which was heard by Mr. Justice P. K. Banerjee. the petitioner. Hasimara Industries Ltd (the appellant before us) challenged the validity of a...

Purushottamdass and Another (Bulakidas Mohta Co. P. Ltd.) Vs. Registra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 41, 41(2), 560 and 560(6)

Reported in : [1986]60CompCas154(Bom)

Puranik, J.1. By this petitioner under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, the petitioners seek to secure an order of restoration of the name of the company, M/S. Bulakidas Mohta and Co. (P.) Ltd., Akola,...

Gopikumari Birla Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 2(1) and (2), 7(1) and 27(1)

Reported in : [1991]192ITR318(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Dr. V. Balasubramanian, Adv.

D.R. Dhanuka J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions to this court under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The questions read as under : '(1) Whether, on the facts and in...

Sukhraj Singh Vs. the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN203

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Singhvi

1. This petition arises under extraordinary circumstances and is based on allegations of deep intricacies suspected rivalries, intolerance of disloyalty on jejure affairs, at the highest elter of judicial functionaries in the State. It contains allegations...

Santosh Kumar Ghosh Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Sales TaxFood Adulteration

Acts : Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 23 and 24

Reported in : AIR1966Cal396,[1965]16STC931(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Chakravarti, Govt. Pleader and ;Siva Santi Hajara, Adv.

ORDERB.N. Banerjee, J. 1. 'Chhana', according to the Rules framed under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, means 'the product obtained by precipitating the curd from boiling whole milk cow and buffalo by addition of...