Advanced Search Results
Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi and ors ...
Chennai
Sep-30-1982
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 7, 9(1), 9A, 47, 49, 50, 52, 52A, 53, 54 and 55; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4 and 37; Finance Act, 1979
1983(14)ELT2184(Mad)
K.P. Jagadeesan, Adv.
ORDERPadmanabhan, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in this writ appeal is whether the porcelain shells which are used in the manufacture of lightning arresters by the respondents, Messrs W. S. Insulators of India Ltd.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vijay Kumar and ors.
Chennai
Jan-31-2001
Motor Vehicles
2003ACJ523
P. Jagadeesan, G. Nagarajan and ; P. Mani, Advs.
K. Sampath, J.1. The above C.M.As. arise out of M.A.C.T.O.P. Nos. 1846, 1916 and 1855 of 1992 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem. These three claim petitions arose out of a single...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPonnusamy, and ors. Vs. the District Revenue Officer, and ors.
Chennai
Jun-21-2010
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
Mrs.Lita Srinivasan; Mr.P.Jagadeesan, Advs.
1. The petitioners states that one Mr.Muthusamy Gounder owned lands in S.No.360/4 measuring 0.13.5 Ares and in S.No.360/10 measuring 0.17.0 Ares in Karuveppampatti, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District, which was his ancestral property. The fourth respondent in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sivakumar. Vs. Balasubramaniam
Chennai
Jul-04-2012
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Order 6 Rule 17; Constitution of India - Articles 226
Mr. P. Jagadeesan, Adv.
Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order of the Subordinate Judge's Court at Sankari dated 23.09.2011 in I.A. No: 537 of 2011 in O.S. No: 33 of 2006.O R...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Balasubramaniam, Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by S ...
Chennai
Jan-12-2007
Commercial
Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 - Sections 147, 148, 148(2), 202, 202(1) and 242(2); Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992; Rice Milling Industry (Regulation) Act, 1958 - Sections 8(3); Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Opening and Maintenance of Market) Rules, 2000 - Rules 3, 3(2), 4, 4(2), 4(3), 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 8 and 8(1); Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975; Constitution of India - Article 226
(2007)2MLJ791
S. Ramasamy, Addl. Adv. General for ;K. Elango, Special Govt. Pleader, ;C. Selvaraju, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Mani, Adv. for Respondent 5 in WPs 13180, 18689 and 24382/2006 and ;P. Jagadeesan, Adv. for Re
ORDERV. Ramasubramanian, J.1. Deviakurichi Panchayat forms part of the Thalaivasal Panchayat Union. There was a Private Daily Vegetable Market in Deviakurichi Panchayat, located in Survey No. 47/3, which was run under a licence granted by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Dalit Manivannan Vs. Inspector of Police, (Law and Order) and Anoth ...
Chennai
Aug-01-2012
Land Acquisition
(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent pertaining to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeshasayee Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Feb-11-1985
Land Acquisition
(1985)(21)ELT193Tri(Chennai)
1. Appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the Tribunal will be pleased to set aside the order of the Appellate Collector of Customs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs and Central Vs. Kasturi Paper, Foods and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Feb-28-1985
Land Acquisition
(1985)(22)ELT510Tri(Chennai)
1. Appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the Tribunal will be pleased to set aside the order of the Collector of Central Excise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Palmer Foods (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-18-2001
MRTP
1. Upon examining the records and hearing both sides in the present application, we find that the appeal itself can be finally disposed of at this state. We, therefore, allow the application and proceed to deal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalyani Foods Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Apr-06-2004
Excise
(2004)(94)ECC356
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 118/01 Dated 24.10.2001 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the Order-in-Original and has held that duty of Rs. 3,14,199/- is rightly demandable from the party. It is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »