Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: p jagadeesan · Page 1 of about 84 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 30 1982

Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-30-1982

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 7, 9(1), 9A, 47, 49, 50, 52, 52A, 53, 54 and 55; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 4 and 37; Finance Act, 1979

Reported in : 1983(14)ELT2184(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : K.P. Jagadeesan, Adv.

ORDERPadmanabhan, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in this writ appeal is whether the porcelain shells which are used in the manufacture of lightning arresters by the respondents, Messrs W. S. Insulators of India Ltd.,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2001

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vijay Kumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2003ACJ523

Advocate for Respondent : P. Jagadeesan, G. Nagarajan and ; P. Mani, Advs.

K. Sampath, J.1. The above C.M.As. arise out of M.A.C.T.O.P. Nos. 1846, 1916 and 1855 of 1992 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem. These three claim petitions arose out of a single...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2010

Ponnusamy, and ors. Vs. the District Revenue Officer, and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-21-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs.Lita Srinivasan; Mr.P.Jagadeesan, Advs.

1. The petitioners states that one Mr.Muthusamy Gounder owned lands in S.No.360/4 measuring 0.13.5 Ares and in S.No.360/10 measuring 0.17.0 Ares in Karuveppampatti, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District, which was his ancestral property. The fourth respondent in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 04 2012

Sivakumar. Vs. Balasubramaniam

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-04-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Order 6 Rule 17; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P. Jagadeesan, Adv.

Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order of the Subordinate Judge's Court at Sankari dated 23.09.2011 in I.A. No: 537 of 2011 in O.S. No: 33 of 2006.O R...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2007

N. Balasubramaniam, Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-12-2007

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 - Sections 147, 148, 148(2), 202, 202(1) and 242(2); Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992; Rice Milling Industry (Regulation) Act, 1958 - Sections 8(3); Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Opening and Maintenance of Market) Rules, 2000 - Rules 3, 3(2), 4, 4(2), 4(3), 7, 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 8 and 8(1); Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2007)2MLJ791

Advocate for Respondent : S. Ramasamy, Addl. Adv. General for ;K. Elango, Special Govt. Pleader, ;C. Selvaraju, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Mani, Adv. for Respondent 5 in WPs 13180, 18689 and 24382/2006 and ;P. Jagadeesan, Adv. for Re

ORDERV. Ramasubramanian, J.1. Deviakurichi Panchayat forms part of the Thalaivasal Panchayat Union. There was a Private Daily Vegetable Market in Deviakurichi Panchayat, located in Survey No. 47/3, which was run under a licence granted by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2012

A. Dalit Manivannan Vs. Inspector of Police, (Law and Order) and Anoth ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-01-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent pertaining to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1985

Seshasayee Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Feb-11-1985

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1985)(21)ELT193Tri(Chennai)

1. Appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the Tribunal will be pleased to set aside the order of the Appellate Collector of Customs...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1985

Collector of Customs and Central Vs. Kasturi Paper, Foods and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Feb-28-1985

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1985)(22)ELT510Tri(Chennai)

1. Appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 praying that in the circumstances stated therein, the Tribunal will be pleased to set aside the order of the Collector of Central Excise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2001

New India Palmer Foods (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Sep-18-2001

Subject : MRTP

1. Upon examining the records and hearing both sides in the present application, we find that the appeal itself can be finally disposed of at this state. We, therefore, allow the application and proceed to deal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2004

Kalyani Foods Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Apr-06-2004

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2004)(94)ECC356

1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. 118/01 Dated 24.10.2001 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the Order-in-Original and has held that duty of Rs. 3,14,199/- is rightly demandable from the party. It is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial