Advanced Search Results
Shri M.D. Kawade and Another Vs. Mahindra Engineering and Chemical Pro ...
Mumbai
Nov-16-1999
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 11-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
2000(1)ALLMR10; 2000(2)BomCR166; [2000(85)FLR217]
P.H. Purav, Adv.
ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner No. 1-workman and his union are the petitioners in the present petition to impugn the award Part II passed by the Presiding Officer, 2nd Labour Court, Pune rejecting the reference.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAzad Kamgar Union Vs. M/S. Metagraphs Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Mar-09-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25-F, 25FFA, 25-I, 25-O, 25-O(7) and 30-A; Constitution of India - Article 226
2001(4)ALLMR87; (2001)3BOMLR147; [2001(90)FLR798]; (2002)IVLLJ923Bom
Mr. P.H. Purav, Adv., ;i/b Mr. V.P. Sawant
ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The Petitioner Union is aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 15.12.1999 passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No. 842 of 1998 filed by the Petitioner against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShantaram Genuji Satav Vs. B.A.i.F. Laboratories Ltd. and Shri P.S. Sh ...
Mumbai
Jun-18-2004
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)
2004(4)ALLMR353; 2005(2)BomCR430; [2005(105)FLR1121]; (2005)IILLJ552Bom; 2005(1)MhLj950
P.H. Purav, ;V.P. Sawant and ;Purav, Advs. for Respondent No. 1
Nishita Mhatre, J.1. This petition is directed against the order dated 22nd August 1995 passed by the Labour Court, Pune in applications under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The applications have been dismissed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kamgar Utkarsha Sabha Vs. Ghatge Patil Transport Ltd. and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-27-1998
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10
(1999)ILLJ838Bom
P.H. Purav and ;V.P. Sawant, Advs. for Respondent No. 1, ;Pradeep Jadhav, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and ;M.S. Vaidya, Adv. for Respondent No. 4
1. Rule returnable forthwith Respondents waive service through respective Advocates.2. After having perused the record and heard the learned Advocates for all the parties, we are satisfied that the reasons given by the State Government for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaharashtra Krishi Udyog Vikas Mahamandal Adhikari Sanghatana Vs. Maha ...
Mumbai
Jan-10-2001
Labour and IndustrialService
Trade Unions Act, 1926; Constitution of India - Article 12
2001(3)BomCR347; (2001)2BOMLR250; 2001(2)MhLj429
Mr. P.H. Purav and ;Mr. V.P. Sawant, Advs.
ORDERA. M. Khanwilkar, J.Rule. Returnable forthwith by consent.Heard both sides.1. This petition has been filed by the Officers' Association challenging the action of the respondent-Corporation vide order dated 19.5.2000 cancelling the orders of promotion and up...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmgauda Sidram Hakke Vs. Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Developmen ...
Mumbai
Dec-06-1994
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 14; Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Employees Service Regulations - Regulations 31, 31(1), 68 and 68(1)
1995(2)BomCR595; (1995)IILLJ948Bom
P.H. Purav, Adv.
B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an Award dated February 8, 1991 made by the 2nd Labour Court, Pune, in Reference (IDA) No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›