Advanced Search Results

Dargah Committee, Ajmer Vs. Smt. Hamida Banu and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 107 and 151 - Order 41, Rules 17, 17(1), 19 and 33

Reported in : AIR1988Raj169; 1987(2)WLN895

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Mathur, Adv. for; Hamida Banu, Adv.

D.L. Mehta, J.1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment and decree dt. 28th Oct., 1976 passed by the learned District Judge, Ajmer in Civil Suit No. 18/73. Plaintiff Dargah Committee instituted a suit against...

Niranjan Lal Vs. Nemi Chand and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN109

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P.D. Mathur

Narendra Mohan Kasuwal, J.1. This revision by the defendant is directed against the order of Additional District Judge No. 1, dated 31-3-1986 confirming the older of Civil Judge, Alwar dated 26-11-1982.2. Brief facts leading to this...

Gopi Chand Vs. Komal Khand

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)738

Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. A preliminary objection has been taken by Shri P.D. Mathur, the learned Counsel for the defendants-respondents that since the sole plaintiff Gopi Chand expired in March, 1977, the suit for pre-emption cannot...

Madan Mohan Vs. Revti Prasad and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 39, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR1977Raj191; 1977()WLN70

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Mathur and; M.M. Tewari, Advs. for Respondent No. 1

ORDERD.P. Gupta, J.1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that both the revision applications may be heard together and as respondent No. 1 alone would be affected by the decision of these revision applications, they may...

Phoolchand Vs. Motilal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Jaipur Tenancy Act - Sections 100 and 105; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1952Raj128

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Mathur, Adv.

ORDERSharma, J.1. This is a revision application by the defendant against the judgment and decree of the Judge, Small Causes, Jaipur City. The pontiff and the defendant are co-sharers in a certain property in village Nevta....

Bhanwarlal and anr. Vs. Dhulilal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR1959Raj218

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Mathur, Adv.

K.L. Bapna, J.1. This case has been referred to a Division Bench by a learned Judge sitting in Single Bench, before whom the case first came for hearing,2. The respondents Dhulilal and Chandralal instituted a suit...

Mst. Bhoori Vs. Thakur Gulab Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 25 and 63

Reported in : AIR1958Raj10

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Mathur, Adv.

Bapna, J.1. This is a defendant's second appeal in a money suit.2. Thakur Ehoor Singh, father of the respondents, instituted a suit against Mst. Bhoori, widow and heir of Pt. Madho Prasad, for recovery of Rs....

Shiv Kalyan Singh and anr. Vs. Bhur Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Jaipur Hitkarni Committee Rules, 1945 - Rule 1; Jaipur General Clauses Act, 1944 - Sections 5(1); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1954Raj182

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Mathur, Adv.

Wanchoo, C.J. 1. These are two connected applications challenging the validity of the Jaipur Hitkarni Committee Rules. 2. These Rules, which appeared in the Jaipur Government Gazette, dated 15-8-1945 provided for the appointment of what are...

Hukmi Chand Vs. Jaipur Ice and Oil Mills Co. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 36, 54, 55 and 55(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1980Raj155; 1980()WLN200

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Dutt and; P.D. Mathur, Advs.

Mahendra Bhushan, J. 1. This is a defendant's Special Appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance against the judgment of the learned single Judge dated December 9, 1969, and arises out of a...

Seth Rajmal Vs. Dr. Krishan Swaroop

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 14; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 116

Reported in : AIR1957Raj118

Advocate for Respondent : P.D. Mathur, Adv.

Bapna, J. 1. This is a second appeal by the landlord in a suit for ejectment and arrears of rent.2. The appellant landlord instituted a suit for ejectment on 16-10-1951, on the ground that the premises...