Advanced Search Results
S.S. Bola and Others Vs. B.D. Sardana and Others
Supreme Court of India
Jul-11-1997
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 309, 3; Punjab Service of Engineers, Class I, PWD (Buildings and Roads Branch), (Public Health Branch) Rules, 1960 - Rule 3(2);
AIR1997SC3127; JT1997(6)SC637; 1997(5)SCALE90; (1997)8SCC522; [1997]Supp2SCR507
K. RAMASWAMY, J. (dissenting) 1. Application/s for impleadment allowed. 2. These appeals and transfer cases are wrapped up of complex facts interwoven with diverse principles in service jurisprudence, compounded by legislative intervention impinging upon judicial review...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.S. Pathania and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Jul-26-1994
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16
1994IIIAD(Delhi)872; 55(1994)DLT468; 1994(30)DRJ362; 1994LabIC2520
Jaspal Singh, J. (1) Here is yet another writ petition making a grievance of the promotions made and the seniority fixed.(2) First, the bird eye view of the facts. By order dated June 12, 1980 the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskY. Markandeyudu and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-21-2002
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 226, 309, 311 and 312; Andhra Pradesh Treasury and Accounts Subordinate Service Rules - Rule 6; Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996
2002(2)ALD362; 2002(2)ALT1
Additional Adv. General and ;M. Surender Rao, Adv.
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. The subject matter that arises for consideration in both these writ petitions is one and the same and, therefore, they can conveniently be disposed of by a common order. The petitioners herein...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sanjay Vishwakarma @ Sanjay Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand ...
Jharkhand
Dec-12-2007
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21
2008(56)BLJR1466; [2008(2)JCR388(Jhr)]
S. Ranjan, J.C. to G.P.II
Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction on the respondents to consider the petitioners' candidature for regular appointment, who had been working on daily wage basis for several...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kumar B.P. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Kerala
Feb-25-2009
Service
Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958 - Rules 2(12), 3, 5, 7, 27, 88 and 110B; Kerala Financial Code - Rule 69
2009(2)KLJ38
P. Nandakumar, Adv. and; Alexander Thomas, S.C.,; Kalees
T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.O.P. No. 34203/2002 & W.P. (C) Nos. 5929/08. S935/08, 5950/08, 5998/08. 6045/08. 23362/08 & 30902/081. In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against the order passed by the Government dated 13-02-2008 adopting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNanjappa Vs. Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation
Karnataka
Sep-24-1993
Service
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Cadre and Recruitment Regulations - Regulation 15
ILR1993KAR3531
K. Lakshminarayana Rao, Adv.
ORDERHanumanthappa, J. 1. Since the facts are similar and the points to be considered being common, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of by this Common Order. 2. The point for consideration in these Writ Petitions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askishwar Chandra Garg Vs. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad
Nov-12-1999
Service
2000(2)AWC1362
C.S.C.
S.H.A. Raza and Kamal Kishore, JJ.1. It is well-settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of P. D. Agarwal v. State of U. P., 1987 (3) SCC 622. that the seniority of Assistant Engineer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeshav Deo and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-16-1998
Service
Uttar Pradesh Services of Engineers (Buildings and Roads Branch), Class-II Rules, 1936 - Rules 5, 6, 12 and 23; Utter Pradesh Services of Engineers (Buildings and Roads Branch), Class-II (Amendment) Rules, 1936; Utter Pradesh Services of Engineers (Buildings and Roads Branch), Class-II (Amendment) Rules, 1971
1998VIAD(SC)478; AIR1999SC44; JT1998(7)SC216; 1998LabIC3554; 1998(5)SCALE621; (1999)1SCC280; [1998]Supp2SCR343; (1999)1UPLBEC12
M. Srinivasan, J.1. The first appellant was appointed as an Overseer (re-designated as Junior Engineer) on adhoc basis in Public Works Department (for short P.W.D), State of U.P. on 17.7.1970 and was approved by the Public...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijaya Kumar Shrotriya Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-13-1998
Service
JT1998(1)SC692; (1998)IIIMLJ22(SC); 1998(1)SCALE598; (1998)3SCC397; [1998]1SCR883; (1998)1UPLBEC700
Alka Aggarwal, ; R.K. Singh and ; R.B. Misra, Advs.
ORDER1. The short question raised is, whether the appellant is entitled to the benefit of his earlier service rendered in the Irrigation Department for his promotion and seniority in the Public Works Department (PWD). The foundation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFaridabad Iron and Steel Traders Association Vs. Union of India and or ...
Delhi
Dec-04-2001
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 2001 - Rules 3.11, 9, 31 and 52AA(5)
95(2001)DLT763; 2002(61)DRJ445; 2002(80)ECC59; 2002(140)ELT378(Del)
Manmohan and ; Manish, Advs.
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. The virus of Rule 3.11 as contained in Central Excise Manual, 2001-02 which is questioned in this writ petition, is in the following terms:'3.11 Provision has been made for permitting the CENVAT credit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »