Advanced Search Results
Andrew Yule and Co. Ltd. Vs. Descon Ltd. and anr.
Kolkata
Nov-17-2006
CompanyCivil
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 77A, 77B, 81(1A), 173(2) and 209A; ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985
2007(3)CHN287
P.C. Sen, ;P. Ray and ;Raj Ratna Sen, Advs. for Respondent No. 1 and ;S.B. Mukherjee and S.C. Bagari, Advs. for Respondent No. 2
Aniruddha Bose, J.1. The present interlocutory motion, being G. A. No. 1745 of 2006 is taken out by the petitioner primarily to prevent the respondent, DESCON LIMITED, from issuing equity shares on preferential basis, upto a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMolla Sirajul Haque and Etc. Vs. Gorachand Mullick and Others
Kolkata
Jun-26-1992
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 107(2) and 141 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 21 - Order 23, Rule 3;; Constitution of India - Article 134A;; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 105;; Indian Contract Act, 1872
AIR1993Cal58,(1993)1CALLT16(HC),1992(2)CHN95,97CWN520
P.C. Sen, ;Dipak Basu, ;B.S. Sinha Roy, ;N.K. Nandi, Bimal Chatterjee, ;C. Banerjee, ;M. Singh, ;P.N. Roy, Shyam Sarkar and ;A.C. Mukherjee, Advs.
ORDERA. M. Bhattacharjee, Actg. C. J.1. Facts necessary for the disposal of the application before us have been succinctly stated by Ray, J. in his judgment hereinafter following. The questions of law involved have also been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUniversal Petro Chemicals Limited Vs. Bp P.L.C. and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-10-2005
Civil
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973
(2005)2CALLT405(HC),2005(2)CHN239
D.N. Sharma, Adv. for defendant No. 1, ;P.C. Sen, Siddhartha Mitra and Padam Khaitan, Advs. for defendant No. 2 and ;Sudipto Sarkar, Mausumi Bhattacharyay and Padam Khaitan, Advs. for defendant No. 3
Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.1. Universal Petro Chemicals Limited (Universal in short) institutes this suit, inter alia, praying for a decree for perpetual injunction restraining the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 from marketing in India any lubricant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Bharat Commerce and Industries Ltd.
Kolkata
Nov-16-1971
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17 and 17(3)
[1973]43CompCas162(Cal)
P.C. Sen. Adv.
ORDERRamendra Mohan Datta, J. 1. This is an application for the confirmation by the court of the special resolution passed by the above named company relating to the proposed change of its registered office from Calcutta...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Charge Chrome Ltd. Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd.
Kolkata
Jan-20-1995
CivilArbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 20 and 41; ;Specific Relief Act - Sections 38 to 42
(1996)1CALLT214(HC)
P.C. Sen, ;Hirak Mitra, ;Sudipta Sarkar and ;Monoj Roy, Advs.
Shyamal Kumra Sen, J.1. The facts in short in respect of the application under Section 41 of the Arbitration Act are that the petitioner company has its factory at Choudwar which is a 100% Export Oriented...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTapan Kumar Paul Vs. Krishna Kanta Paul and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-19-1979
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 30
AIR1980Cal28
P.C. Sen, ;S.K. Upadhya, Advs. (for No. 1), ;R.C. Nag, ;Sankar Ghose, ;Avijit Dev, Advs. (for Nos. 2 and 3), ;S.B. Mukherjee, ;Ruma Paul, Advs. (for No. 4), ;Somnath Chatterjee and ;U. Mukherjee, Advs
ORDERSabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This is an application under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 challenging the award dated 30th of Jan. 1978 made by one Shri A. K. Sen, Barrister-at-Law. The award and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShib Nath Paul Vs. Jaharlal Paul and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-16-1981
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 44
AIR1982Cal143
P.C. Sen, Adv. (for No. 1) and ;Swapan Mallik, Adv. (for No. 2)
C.K. Banerji, J. 1. In this interlocutory application the appellant is asking, inter alia, for an injunction restraining the respondent No. 1, his servants, agents and assistants from parting with possession of the vacant portion of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNripendra Kumar Ghosh Vs. Registrar of Companies and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-21-1984
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 159 and 162
[1985]58CompCas672(Cal),88CWN850
P.C. Sen, Adv.
Umesh Chandra Banerjee, J. 1. This application arises out of complaints filed by the Registrar of Companies, being Case Nos. C/2083/82, C/2085/82, C/2103/82, C/2112/82, C/2138/82, C/2146/82, C/2151/82 and C/2163/82 in the Court of the Chief Metropolitan...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSishu Ranjan Dutta and anr. Vs. Bhola Nath Paper House Ltd.
Kolkata
Dec-18-1980
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(13), 2(26), 43A, 267, 268, 269, 317, 320, 397, 398 and 402
[1983]53CompCas883(Cal)
P.C. Sen and ;Hirak Mitter, Advs. for respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and ;Pratap Chatterjee, Adv. for respondent Nos. 6 and 7
Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is an application under Sections 397, 398, etc., of the Companies Act, 1956, for the appointment of a Special Officer and/or Administrator and for an order or direction to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEast Indian Produce Ltd. Vs. Naresh Acharya Bhaduri and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-09-1985
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 255, 256, 284, 372, 372(1) and 372(4); ;Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 13 and 16
[1988]64CompCas259(Cal)
Bimal Chatterjee, Adv. for respondent No 1, ;S.B. Mukherjee and ;Anindya Mitra, Advs. for respondent Nos. 2, 4 and 7, ;P.C. Sen and ;Jayanta Mitra, Advs. for respondent No. 6
R.N. Pyne, J. 1. The appellant, East Indian Produce Ltd., has made this application in an appeal filed by it against an ad interim order dated December 5, 1984, of C. K. Banerjee J. whereby his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »