Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: p a sharma · Page 1 of about 1,619 results (0.464 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 14 2014

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-14-2014

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. L.K. Singh, Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Aditi Gupta, Mr. P.K. Sharma, Ms. Zubeda Begum, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Ms. Meera Bhatia, Mr. Saleem Ahmed

$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1549/2009 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev K. Virmani, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae) versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2014

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-12-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Ms. Sara Sundaram, Mr. Suresh Kumar, Ms. Damyanti, Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Mr. P. Karunakaran, Mr. Robin Hibu, Mr. P.K. Sharma, Mr. Jaideep Tandon, Ms. Zubeda Begum

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 817/2014 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through: ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2015

Lakshmi Kanth Shinde @ L.K. Shinde Vs. The State of Telangana represen ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-02-2015

Subject : Education

1. In the present writ petition, challenge is to the Memorandum No.1697/SC-A/A2/2008-4 dated 22.08.2011 issued by the first respondent State Government. By virtue of the said memorandum, the State Government permitted the Anti-Corruption Bureau to file...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 16 2013

S.Ram Yadav Vs. Cbi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P.K. Sharma, Mr. A.K. Singh

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 763/2011 & Crl.M.A. 473/2013 Reserved on:20. h March, 2013 Decided on:16. h May, 2013 % S.RAM YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2014

Mithlesh Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-2014

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh, Mr. Sachin Datta, Ms. Ritika Vhurani, Mr. P.K. Sharma, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Ms. Renu Malik

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h July, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1618/2014 MITHLESH KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2015

M/S Ajanta Merchants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-09-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Jain, Mr. P.K. Sharma

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. December, 2014 Date of Decision:09. h April, 2015 % + CRL. M.C. No.5581/2014 M/S AJANTA MERCHANTS PVT. LTD. ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1977

Shripatrao Dajisaheb Ghatge and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-22-1977

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Aritcles 32, 32(1), 32(2), 132, 133, 136(1), 225, 226, 227, 227(1), 227(2), 227(3), 227(4), 227(5), 323A, 323A(3), 323B, 323B(3), 323B(4) and 359(1); Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 58; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 88(1) and 88C; Land Acquisition Act; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947; General Clauses Act, 1897; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 224 and 224(2); Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 107; High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 15; Bombay Civil Courts Act; Presidency and Provincial Small Cause Courts Act; Bombay City Civil Court Act; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act; Motor Vehicles Act,

Reported in : AIR1977Bom384; (1977)79BOMLR259; 1977MhLJ406

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Sawant, Addl. Govt. Pleader, ;D.P. Hegde, Asst. Govt. Pleader, ;D.M. Rane, ;N.K. Iyer, ;K.K. Singhvi, ;P.K. Singhvi, ;B.N. Singhvi and ;S.J. Deshpande, Advs.

Tulzapurkar, Actg. C.J. 1. These four petitions have been placed before this larger bench with a view to ascertain the impact of Article 227 of the Constitution as amended by the Constitution (42 Amendment) Act, 1976...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2001

Shreepal Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-31-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC810

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Sharma, Adv.

A. K. Yog, J.1. The petitioner, Shreepal Singh has approached this Court by filing present petition under Article 226, Constitution of India seeking to challenge order dated April 24, 1995, passed by District Basic Education Officer,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2004

Smt. Manju Keshi Dixit Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC3758

Advocate for Respondent : P.C. Sharma, S.C.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, Smt. Manju Keshi Dixit, seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorart quashing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2007

General Manager, North West Railway and ors. Vs. Chanda Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2007

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 96B(2); Minimum Wages Act; Workmen's Compensation Act; Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 - Rule 2; State Railway Provident Fund (Contributory) Rules; Indian Railway Service Establishment Code; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 41, 42, 142, 309, 310 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2007(14)SCALE296; (2008)2SCC108; 2008AIRSCW172; AIR2008SC856; 2008LABIC458; 2007(8)Crimes437; 2008-I-LLJ-867; 2008(1)LH(SC)262

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Sharma, ; Gaurav Nagar, ; S.K. Mishra and ;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.Interpretation of some of the provisions of the Indian Railway Establishment Manual (hereinafter referred to as 'the Manual') is in question in these appeals which arise out of judgments of the Rajasthan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial