Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: p a pol · Page 1 of about 25 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 29 2002

Laxmi R. Karhadkar Vs. Resident Deputy District Collector and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-29-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR715; 2003(4)BomCR289; 2003(2)MhLj14

Advocate for Respondent : R.D. Rane, Additional Government Pleader for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and ;P.A. Pol, Adv. for respondents Nos. 3 and 4

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. This petition is filed by the petitioner for quashing and setting aside an order passed by the Resident Deputy District Collector, Mumbai City, respondent No. 1 herein, on October 7, 2002 by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2011

Adarsh Co-operative Housing Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-27-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

AJN 00-CRI-WP570.11 :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.570 OF 2011 Adarsh Co-operative Housing ) Society Limited, a Society ) registered under the Maharashtra ) Co-operative Societies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2003

Pandurang Subrao Dhabugade and anr. Vs. Agricultural Produce Market Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-17-2003

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR858; 2004(4)BomCR172; (2004)106BOMLR328; 2004(2)MhLj660

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule. Mr. P.A. Pol, learned Counsel, appears and waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. V.P. Malvankar, learned Assistant Government Pleader, appears and waives service...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 2009

Smt. Savitri Chandrakesh Pal Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1965 - Sections 3; Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995; Maharashtra Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1975 - Schedule - Sections 24; Maharashtra Foodgrains Rationing (Second) Order, 1966; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227, 323A and 323B; Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1966 - Rules 1, 2, 4, 17 and 18; Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960

Reported in : 2009(4)MhLj406

Advocate for Respondent : V.A. Gangal, Special Counsel and ;S.K. Chinchlikar, AGP and ;Ashok G. Gade, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and ;Uday Warunjikar and ;P.A. Pol, Advs. for respondent No. 4

V.C. Daga, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith.2. Mr. Gangal, special counsel appearing along with learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. Warunjikar with Mr. Pol for respondent No. 4 waived service.3. Heard finally by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2009

Mohammad Nazir and anr. Vs. Kaizad Gustad and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 182, 201, 304 and 304(A); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 227

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3889

Advocate for Respondent : Junajo Shabwany, Adv., i/b., Rohit Sawant, Adv. for Res. No. 1 and ;P.A. Pol, APP for State

Mridula Bhatkar, J.1. This revision petition is preferred by the aggrieved party i.e. the parents of the deceased against the order dated 14/1/2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai discharging the accused from the charges of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2010

R.V. BhasIn Vs. State of Maharashtra and Marine Drive Police Station

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-06-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Bombay Police Act - Sections 59; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 4(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 124A, 153, 153A, 153B, 292, 293, 295A, 301 and 505; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 95, 95(1), 96, 96(4), 99A, 99C, 144, 468 and 473; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 99A and 99D; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 19(2) and 226

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR154

Advocate for Respondent : Ravi Kadam, Adv. General, ;S.R. Borulkar, Adv., ;P.A. Pol, Public Prosecutor and ;M.M. Deshmukh, Adv.

Ranjana Desai, J.1. Rule. Respondents waive service. With the consent of the parties and at the request of the counsel, taken up for hearing.2. The applicant, who is an advocate, is the author of a book...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2008

Videocon International and ors. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of I ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-16-2008

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Securities Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 4, 11, 11A, 11C, 11C(1), 11D, 12, 12A, 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15F, 15G, 15H, 15HA, 15HB, 15JA, 15L, 15M, 15N, 15O, 15Z, 24, 24(1), 24(2), 26, 26(1), 26(2) and 27; Securities Exchange Board of India (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 24, 24(1) and 24(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 27(1), 271(1) and 274(2); Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970 - Sections 274(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 6, 154, 161, 164, 165, 173, 175, 190, 193, 200, 202, 202(2), 204, 207, 208, 209, 226, 227, 256, 257, 258, 260, 260(1), 307, 378, 378(4), 386, 389, 390, 391, 392, 397, 397(2), 397(3), 401, 401(1), 401(5) and 482; Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transacti

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR215; 2008BusLR269(Bom); [2009]151CompCas548(Bom); [2008]82SCL460(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : H.H. Ponda, Sr. Adv., ;V.N. Shingnapurkar and ;Amit Borkar, Advs. for SEBI in W.P. 338/07, ;R.F. Lambay, Adv. for Union of India in W.P. 1611/2007 and ;P.A. Pol, APP for State

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. Rule. With the consent of the parties, the petitions/applications have been finally heard at length. 2. This group of petitions/applications filed under Article 227 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1994

Murlidhar Bapuji Valve Vs. Yallappa Lalu Chaugule Since Deceased by Hi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-18-1994

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 21, 101 to 104; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 4(1); Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 8(1); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 27; Transfer of Property (Amending) Act, 1929

Reported in : AIR1994Bom358; 1994(3)BomCR461; (1994)96BOMLR530

Advocate for Respondent : P.A. Pol and ;Mohan Pungalia, Advs.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 2-3-1982 passed by 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune in Special Suit No. 127 of 1966. The appeal has been filed by the original...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2008

Amit Ashok thepade and ors. Vs. Shah Nagindas Manchharam and Sons and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-2008

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2008(3)BomCR649

Advocate for Respondent : K.Y. Mandlik, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and; P.A. Pol, A.P.P. for Respondent No. 2 for State.

Mhatrre Nishita, J.1. This petition has been filed for quashing the order passed by the J.M.F.C. Kolhapur in S.C.C. No. 3196 of 2003 and the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Criminal Revision Application No. 48 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 2007

Ananda Dnyandeo Shinde Vs. the Chairman, Mahatma Jyotirao Phule Vishwa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-20-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules - Rule 9(4)

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR602; 2008(2)MhLj562

Advocate for Respondent : H.G. Wakshe, Adv. h/f P.A. Pol, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and; S.K. Chinchalikar, AGP for Respondent No. 4

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. The Petition challenges the order of the School Tribunal passed in Appeal No.188 of 1996. The School Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the Petitioner.2. The Petitioner was initially appointed as a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial