Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: nirmal kumar sen · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.067 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 1962

Ray (R.) Vs. Dalvi (V.G.) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-19-1962

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1962)IILLJ562Cal

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. There is a National Federation of Post and Telegraph Employees, a trade union. A constituent body of the said trade union is the All India Postal Employees' Union, Postmen and Class IV, which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1951

The State Vs. Sadananda Darji and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-06-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 185 and 185(1)

Reported in : AIR1952Cal563

Advocate for Respondent : Nirmal Kumar Sen, Deputy Legal Remembrancer

P.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is a reference to us from the District Magistrate of Midnapur under Section 185(1), Criminal P. C. That section provides that'Whenever a question arises as to which of two or more Courts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1952

Gour Gopal Mukherjee Vs. Chief Secretary to the Govt. of West Bengal a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-1952

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3A, 4, 5 and 7; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; ;Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951; ;Constitution of India - Article 245

Reported in : AIR1953Cal81,56CWN427

Advocate for Respondent : S.M. Bose, Adv. General and ;Nirmal Kumar Sen, Deputy Legal Remembrancer

G.N. Das, J.1. This case was heard by a Bench of this Court, Sarkar and P.N. Mookerjee JJ.2. The learned Judges having differed in their decisions, the matter was directed by the learned Chief Justice to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 24 1951

Rajlakshmi Devi Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-24-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 205 and 205(2)

Reported in : AIR1953Cal154,56CWN221

Advocate for Respondent : Nirmal Kumar Sen, Deputy Legal Remembrancer and ;Bibhuti Bhusan Das Gupta, Adv.

R.P. Mookerjee, J. 1. The only question for decision in this case is whether there are sufficient grounds to dispense with the personal attendance in court of the accused, a purdanashin Hindu lady, and to permit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1951

Badri Prosad Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-05-1951

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 7(2) and 13A; ;Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) (Amendment) Act - 1950; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 497; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 26

Reported in : AIR1953Cal28,56CWN406

Advocate for Respondent : Amaresh Chandra Roy, Adv. and ;Nirmal Kumar Sen, D.L.R.

P.B. Mukharji, J. 1. This is an application for bail under Section 498, Criminal P. C. The central question in this application is, how far the powers of the Court to grant bail have been cut...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1952

Shyamapada Pal Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-12-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 297

Reported in : AIR1952Cal284

Advocate for Respondent : Nirmal Kumar Sen, Adv.

Harries, C.J.1. This is a petition for revision of an order of an appellate Court upholding a conviction of the petitioner by a trial Court for dacoity and confirming the sentence of three years' rigorous imprisonment.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1949

Umesh Chandra Pal Vs. the King

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-15-1949

Subject : Criminal

Acts : West Bengal Black Marketing Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 12, 12(2), 14 and 26; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 474

Reported in : AIR1950Cal125

Advocate for Respondent : Nirmal Kumar Sen and ;Amaresh Chandra Roy, Advs.

Das Gupta, J.1. The appellant was tried by a Special Tribunal of Alipore constituted under the West Bengal Black Marketing Act, 1948 and convicted under Section 3 read with Section 2 (h) of that Act, also...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 1950

Kalipada Nandi Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-16-1950

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bengal Foodgrains Control Order, 1945 - Sections 2 and 3(1);; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103 and 114

Reported in : AIR1950Cal427

Advocate for Respondent : Nirmal Kumar Sen, Deputy Legal Remembrancer

Das Gupta, J.1. This rule is directed against an order of conviction and sentence, under Section 7 of Act XXIV [24] of 1946, passed by a Magistrate, at Arambagh, and confirmed in appeal by the Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 1950

Prithish Dey Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-30-1950

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114 and 224; ;Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 12, 46, 51 and 56; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114

Reported in : AIR1952Cal319,55CWN140

Advocate for Respondent : Nirmal Kumar Sen, ;Deputy Legal Remembrancer and ;Jitendra Mohan Banerjee, Advs.

Das Gupta, J.1. This Rule was issued on the Chief Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta to show cause why the proceedings pending against the petitioner under Section 224 & 224/114, Penal Code, should not be quashed.2. These...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2005

Harjeet Singh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-06-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 362, 387, 369, 401, 424, 482 and 561A; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379, 401 and 411; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 369

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN445,2005CriLJ3286,2005(3)CTC217,[2005(4)JCR422(Cal)]

Advocate for Respondent : None

Amit Talukdar, J.1. Faced with two different versions one of a Division Bench; another of a Single Bench on the impact of Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial