Advanced Search Results

Gordhandas Lalchnd Vs. Kubchand Tirthdas Tailor and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Bombay Rent Act, 1987 - Sections 5(11), 12(2), 13(1), 14, 14(1), 15, 15A, 15(1), 15(2) and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 21, Rule 97 - Order 22, Rule 4; Constitution of India - Article 227; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Act, 1973

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR163; 2005(2)BomCR470; 2005(1)MhLj396

Advocate for Respondent : Niranjan Pandit and ;Ram V. Singh, Advs.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This petition challenges the order dated 23.2.1999 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Cause Court, Mumbai, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent Nos. 4 and 5- obstructionists came to be...

Farida Abubakar Memon and Others Vs. The Collector of Stamps (Enforcem ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners question the following: (i) Order dated 26 October 2007, issued by the Collector Stamps Duty (Enforcement-II), Mumbai requiring the predecessor in title...

inventa Fischer Gmbh and Co. Vs. Polygenta Technologies Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 44 and 48(1); International Cricket Council Rules; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR125(Bom); 2005(2)BomCR364

Advocate for Respondent : Aspi Chinoy, Sr.C., ;Zal T. Andhyarujina and ;S. Mehta, Advs., i/b., Tri Legal for respondent No. 1

Dharmadhikari S.C., J. 1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 1996 Act) to challenge an award dated 21st October, 2003 passed by International Court of Arbitration...

J.K. Synthetics Limited a Company WithIn the Meaning of Companies Act, ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 129

Reported in : AIR2007Bom8; 2006(5)BomCR410; 2006(6)MhLj101

Advocate for Respondent : Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P. for Respondent No. 1 and ;B.D. Joshi for the Court Receiver

Abhay S. Oka, J.1. By this Appeal, the Appellant first Defendant has taken an exception to the judgment and order dated 13th December, 2004 passed in Chamber Summons No. 1211 of 2003 in Suit No. 4411...

Pamvi Consultancy Services Ltd. Vs. Global Syntex (Bhilwara) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5 and 8; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : 2003(1)ARBLR204(Bom); 2002(6)BomCR50

Advocate for Respondent : Niranjan Pandit, Adv.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed the present Summary Suit on the Memorandum of Understanding ('MOU') dated 20-2-1996 entered into between the plaintiff and the defendants. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the...

The Bar Council of Maharashtra a Statutory Body of Legal Professionals ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24(1)

Reported in : AIR2002Bom220; 2002(4)BomCR108; 2002(2)MhLj842

Advocate for Respondent : H.V. Mehta and ;Niranjan Pandit, Advs.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. By means of this Writ Petition filedunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India,the Bar Council of Maharashtra, a statutory Bodyof legal professionals, constituted underAdvocates Act, 1961 and one of its members seek...

Nariman Point Association and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 31(1) and 31(6); Development Control Regulation - Regulation 9

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR930; 2003(5)BomCR273; 2003(3)MhLj68

Advocate for Respondent : Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1, 4 and 5, ;R.M. Sawant, Adv. for respondent No. 2, ;P.A. Sawant and ;N. Engineer, Advs. i/b., ;Desai and Diwanji and ;R.A. Dada, Sr. Adv., ;F. Divetri an

D.Y. Chandrachud, J. 1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned counsel for the respondents waive service. With the consent of the learned counsel taken up for hearing and final disposal.2. In these proceedings under Article 226 of the...

Kewal Semlani Vs. Commissioner of Bombay and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR25

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Singhvi, Sr. C., ;P.A. Purandare, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;Niranjan Pandit, A.G.P. for respondent No. 2 in (PIL) No. 3 and for respondent No. 2 in (PIL) No. 259/2005, ;R.M. Savant, for respon

1. On oral request of the petitioners-parties-in-person, the Director General of Police, Maharashtra State, is impleaded as respondent No. 4 in suo motu Writ Petition No. 3 of 2005 and respondent No. 5 in Writ Petition...

Kum. Jayshree Zine and ors. Vs. Maharashtra Public Service Commission ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR627; 2008(5)BomCR339; (2008)110BOMLR2112; 2008(6)MhLj302

Advocate for Respondent : Niranjan Pandit, Assistant Government Pleader

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. Maharashtra Public Service Commission on 7th May, 2005 issued an advertisement in the newspaper advertising the vacancies for the posts of Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector, Group `C' in the Transport Department of the...

Sion Shivneri Co-operative Housing Society Limited Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 21A

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR146; 2004(1)MhLj557

Advocate for Respondent : Niranjan Pandit, Assistant Government Pleader

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records.2. The petitioner-society challenges the order dated 8-3-1999, passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai Division, Mumbai, under Section 21-A of the...