Advanced Search Results
Raj Pack Well Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-19-1989
Excise
Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act; Textiles Committee Act, 1963 - Sections 2; Central Excise Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Textile (Control) Order, 1986
1993(41)ECC285; 1993LC351(MP); 1990(50)ELT201(MP)
B.G. Neema, Adv.
A.G. Qureshi, J.1. The petitioners in this petition are limited companies registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having their offices at Indore and factories at Pithampur, district Dhar. The petitioners are manufacturing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKirloskar Brothers Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-07-2000
CivilConstitution
Custom Act; Finance Act, 1995 - Sections 11BB, 27A, 28AA and 75; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2001(75)ECC250; 2001(5)MPHT519
B.G. Neema, Adv.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. Petitioner, a limited company, has filed this writ under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, claiming following relief by way of issuance of writ of mandamus against the respondents:-'The petitioner be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Neema Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-30-1992
CriminalCustoms
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act - Sections 3(1); Cutoms Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Maintenance of Internal Security Act; Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226
1993(43)ECC149; 1992(61)ELT59(MP)
B.G. Neema and ;Nigam, Advs.
V.D. Gyani, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner, who has been detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (for short 'the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arunodaya Exports Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-20-1993
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
1993(68)ELT725(MP)
B.G. Neema, Standing Counsel
ORDERV.D. Gyani, J.1. Shri Chafekar, Senior Advocate with Shri V.K. Jain for the petitioner. Shri E.G. Neema, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India, appears on an advance copy of the stay application having supplied to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkumar S/O Daudayal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-14-1989
CriminalConstitution
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22(5), 22(6) and 226
1990MPLJ174
B.G. Neema, Standing Counsel
ORDERV.D. Gyani, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus and for setting aside the Preventive Detention Order dated 17-6-1989 (served...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamkumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-14-1989
CriminalCustoms
Conservation of Foreign Exchange And Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(5), 22(6) and 226; National Security Act - Sections 3; Prevention Detention Order; Customs Act - Sections 108
1990CriLJ546
B.G. Neema, Standing Counsel
V.D. Gyani, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus and for setting aside the Preventive Petition Order dated 17-6-1989 (served...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArunodaya Exports Vs. the Collector of Customs and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-05-1993
Customs
1993(44)ECC250
ORDER5.5.19931. Shri Chafekar, Senior Advocate, with Shri V.K. Jain for the petitioner. Shri B.G. Neema, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India, appears on an advance copy of the stay application having [been] supplied to him...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-29-2000
SICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22
[2001]107CompCas339(MP); 2000(72)ECC280; 2000(122)ELT338(MP)
B.G. Neema, Adv.
N.K. Jain, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashment of the notice of detention dated August 12, 1997 (Annexure F) issued under Rule 230 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Anjali Lahiri Hariya Vs. Union of India and Others
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-03-2001
Customs
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Constitution of India - Articles 22, 22(5) and 141; Customs Act - Sections 108 and 135; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41(1)(4) and 102; Evidence Act - Sections 27
2002(79)ECC518; 2001(4)MPHT101; 2001(3)MPLJ218
Shri B.G. Neema, Adv.
J.G. Chitre, J. 1. The petitioner who happens to be the wife of the detenu Lahiri Hariya is hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and legality of the order which has been passed by the Joint Secretary...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLupIn Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-13-1991
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A, 57F, 57G and 57(I); Constitution of India - Article 226
1992(38)ECC305; 1992(59)ELT375(MP)
B.G. Neema, Adv.
ORDERV.D. Gyani, J.1. Shri A.M. Mathur, Senior Advocate, with Shri C.B. Patne, for the petitioner and Shri B.G. Neema, Central Govt. Advocate, for the respondents, were heard on admission and on application for ad interim relief.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »