Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: neema · Page 1 of about 4,284 results (0.191 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 19 1989

Raj Pack Well Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-19-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act; Textiles Committee Act, 1963 - Sections 2; Central Excise Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Textile (Control) Order, 1986

Reported in : 1993(41)ECC285; 1993LC351(MP); 1990(50)ELT201(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Adv.

A.G. Qureshi, J.1. The petitioners in this petition are limited companies registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having their offices at Indore and factories at Pithampur, district Dhar. The petitioners are manufacturing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 07 2000

Kirloskar Brothers Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-07-2000

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Custom Act; Finance Act, 1995 - Sections 11BB, 27A, 28AA and 75; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(75)ECC250; 2001(5)MPHT519

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Adv.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. Petitioner, a limited company, has filed this writ under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, claiming following relief by way of issuance of writ of mandamus against the respondents:-'The petitioner be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1992

Suresh Neema Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-30-1992

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act - Sections 3(1); Cutoms Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Maintenance of Internal Security Act; Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 1993(43)ECC149; 1992(61)ELT59(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema and ;Nigam, Advs.

V.D. Gyani, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner, who has been detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (for short 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 20 1993

Arunodaya Exports Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-20-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1993(68)ELT725(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Standing Counsel

ORDERV.D. Gyani, J.1. Shri Chafekar, Senior Advocate with Shri V.K. Jain for the petitioner. Shri E.G. Neema, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India, appears on an advance copy of the stay application having supplied to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1989

Ramkumar S/O Daudayal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-14-1989

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22(5), 22(6) and 226

Reported in : 1990MPLJ174

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Standing Counsel

ORDERV.D. Gyani, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus and for setting aside the Preventive Detention Order dated 17-6-1989 (served...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1989

Ramkumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-14-1989

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange And Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(5), 22(6) and 226; National Security Act - Sections 3; Prevention Detention Order; Customs Act - Sections 108

Reported in : 1990CriLJ546

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Standing Counsel

V.D. Gyani, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus and for setting aside the Preventive Petition Order dated 17-6-1989 (served...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1993

Arunodaya Exports Vs. the Collector of Customs and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-05-1993

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1993(44)ECC250

ORDER5.5.19931. Shri Chafekar, Senior Advocate, with Shri V.K. Jain for the petitioner. Shri B.G. Neema, learned Standing Counsel for Union of India, appears on an advance copy of the stay application having [been] supplied to him...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 29 2000

Shree Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-29-2000

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22

Reported in : [2001]107CompCas339(MP); 2000(72)ECC280; 2000(122)ELT338(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Adv.

N.K. Jain, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashment of the notice of detention dated August 12, 1997 (Annexure F) issued under Rule 230 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2001

Smt. Anjali Lahiri Hariya Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-03-2001

Subject : Customs

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 3(1); Constitution of India - Articles 22, 22(5) and 141; Customs Act - Sections 108 and 135; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41(1)(4) and 102; Evidence Act - Sections 27

Reported in : 2002(79)ECC518; 2001(4)MPHT101; 2001(3)MPLJ218

Advocate for Respondent : Shri B.G. Neema, Adv.

J.G. Chitre, J. 1. The petitioner who happens to be the wife of the detenu Lahiri Hariya is hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and legality of the order which has been passed by the Joint Secretary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1991

LupIn Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-13-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A, 57F, 57G and 57(I); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1992(38)ECC305; 1992(59)ELT375(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.G. Neema, Adv.

ORDERV.D. Gyani, J.1. Shri A.M. Mathur, Senior Advocate, with Shri C.B. Patne, for the petitioner and Shri B.G. Neema, Central Govt. Advocate, for the respondents, were heard on admission and on application for ad interim relief.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial