Advanced Search Results

K. Veera Chary S/o Kistaiah Vs. the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Prade ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 233 to 237, 309, 310, 311, 311(2) and 335; Indian Railway Establishment Code Rules - Rules 148(3), 148(4), 149(3) and 149(4); Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(2), 3, 3(1), 3(1A) and 7; Civil Service Regulations; Pepsu Service Regulations; Representation of People (Third Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 33A and 33B; Representation of People (First Amendment) Act, 1985; Andhra Pradesh State Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1958; Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules, 1962; Hyderabad Civil Service Rules - Rule 231; Andhra Pradesh Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1991; Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964; Andhra Pradesh Leave Rules,

Reported in : 2008(5)ALD372; 2008(5)ALT115

Advocate for Respondent : GP for Respondent No. 2 and; P.V. Sanjay Kumar, SC for Respondent No. 1

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.Introduction1. Petitioners are Judicial Officers in the rank of District Judge Grade-II. They are governed by Andhra Pradesh State Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1958 (Higher Judicial Rules, for brevity). Both of them were initially...

Cooverje Jethabhai Shah Vs. Amir Abdulali Kachwala and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rules 1, 3 and 4 - Order 6, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 68; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19 - Schedule - Article 120; Khoti Act; Mahomedan Law

Reported in : AIR1963Bom170; (1963)1BOMLR65; ILR1963Bom1; 1963MhLJ345

Advocate for Respondent : Wanmahatti and ;J.C. Dias, Advs.

Mudholkar, Acting C.J. 1. This is an appeal by the first defendant to a suit for the enforcement of a mortgage and of the personal covenant contained in it.2. Briefly stated this facts are these: The...

Shah Ram Chand Vs. Pandit Parbhu Dayal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1943)45BOMLR1

George Rankin, J.1. This appeal is by the plaintiff in a redemption suit which was brought in the Court of the Subordinate. Judge of Agra in 1924, It has reference to a village called Muthamai in...

Chotelal Gajanan Khole Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Mumbai Municipal Corporation Service Rules - Rule 205(1) and 205(2)

Reported in : 2005(2)BomCR285

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. and ;Vinod Mahadik, Adv.

Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records. Rule. By consent, the Rule is made returnable forthwith.2. The petitioner challenges the order of compulsory retirement passed by the respondent/Corporation on 29th...

K.N. Singh Son of Sri S.N. Singh Vs. the State of U.P. Through the Chi ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Act - Sections 56; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rule 27; Constitution of India - Article 309; Uttar Pradesh Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992

Reported in : 2006(2)SLJ265(NULL)

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Sirchi and ;Amit Sthalekar, Advs. and ;S.C.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the orders dated 25.2.1995 and 8.3.1995 (Annex. 2 and 3, respectively), by which the petitioner had been compulsory retired in exercise of powers under Section...

State of M.P. Vs. Jaisingh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT267

ORDERRajeev Gupta, J.1. Appellant-State has preferred this appeal against the impugned judgment of acquittal dated 12-12-1987, passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Sehore, in ST No. 48/85, whereby all the 4 respondents-accused persons were acquitted of...

Saro Rana and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 304B

Reported in : 2004(3)BLJR2022; 2005CriLJ65; II(2004)DMC827

Advocate for Respondent : T.N. Verma, A.P.P.

Lakshman Uraon, J.1. Appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30th April, 2002 passed by Shri Sita Ram Mahato, learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar in Sessions Trial...

Sardha Ram Vs. Nakli Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : East Punjab Utilisation of Lands Act, 1949; East Punjab Utilisation of Lands (Amendment) Ordinance, 1950

Reported in : AIR1990SC67; 1989(2)SCALE923; 1989Supp(2)SCC620; [1989]Supp1SCR769

S. Ranganathan, J.1. Nawal Singh sold 102 bighas of land to Nathu Ram for Rs. 8000/- by a sale dated 11th February, 1952. He also executed a sale-deed in respect of 90 bighas of land to...

Administrator, Municipal Committee, Charkhi Dadri and Another Vs. Ramj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 - Sections 24, 28(2), 42, 44A and 55C; Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 2, 3 to 11-A, 12 to 21-A, 22 to 27, 28 36, 38, 40, 41 and 80A(3); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 16, 17A, 48A, 54, 57, 58, 59, 60 and 65

Reported in : AIR1995SC2329; JT1995(5)SC486; (1995)2MLJ97(SC); (1995)111PLR281; 1995(4)SCALE559; (1995)5SCC272; [1995]Supp2SCR335

Advocate for Respondent : Prem Malhotra, Adv.

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is preferred against the Judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondents on the ground that the point raised in...

Jai Lal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 19; Evacuee Interest (Separation) Act, 1951 - Sections 7

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT494

J.K. Mehra, J.(1) The petitioner in the present case has filed a writ petition seeking the following reliefs : 'ITis, thereforee, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari,...