Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: navin parekh · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.129 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 10 2004

S.A. Modi Vs. Mrs. T.A. Rana and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-10-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263

Reported in : AIR2004Bom353; 2004(4)BomCR517; 2004(3)MhLj821

Advocate for Respondent : D.D. Madon and ;N. Engineer, Advs., i/b., Mulla and Mulla

R.M. Lodha, J.1. One Bomanji Dorabji Kumana is said to have executed his last Will and testament on 19th June, 1975. The testator died at Bombay on 11th August, 1978. Rustom D. Kumana and Gool D....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1996

Ravindra Lalbachan Tiwari and ors. Vs. Smt. Nirmaladevi Vijaynarayan D ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-23-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 34; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 103

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR75

Advocate for Respondent : Shilpa A. Joshi, Adv. for respondent No. 1 and ;Vasundhara Deshpande, Adv. for respondent No. 2

V.H. Bhairavia, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 8th January, 1996 passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay, in Short Cause Suit No. 7262 of 1985. 2. Short facts emerge from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2004

Shri Cutchi Visa Oswal Derawasi JaIn Pathshala Through Its Chairman Vi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-13-2004

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 2(18) and 22

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR484; 2005(1)BomCR105

Advocate for Respondent : Navin Parekh and ;Z.A. Jariwala, Advs., i/b., Thakore Jariwala & Associates

Daga V.C., J.1. This appeal at the instance of Shri Cutchi Visa Oswal Derawasi Jain Pathshala ('Pathshala Trust' for short) is directed against the order dated 17th June, 2004 passed by the City Civil Court at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 2002

Jaysen Jayant Rele and ors. Vs. Shantaram Ganpat Gujar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11); Maharashtra Rents Act

Reported in : AIR2002Bom462; 2002(6)BomCR415

Advocate for Respondent : Navin Parekh, Adv., i/b., ;Girin Pandit, Adv.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. Like economics very often law also makes common sense difficult. The economists expound several theories and the lawyers formulate several propositions of law based on Judicial pronouncements and their own legal acumen. Otherwise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1998

Mahalaxmi Shikshan Sanstha Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-08-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 9 and 16 ; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 36 and 37; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR35; 1998(3)BomCR796; 1998(1)MhLj826

Advocate for Respondent : Rajiv Mane, Adv. and ;V.V. Pai, A.G.P.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J. 1. The petitioners, by means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of constitution of India seek to assail the legality and correctness of the order dated 16-4-85 passed by the School...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 1992

NavIn Parekh Vs. Madhubala Shridhar Sharma and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-29-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1992)94BOMLR467

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. This is a criminal writ petition filed by a practising advocate whereby he has assailed the validity of an order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplanade, Bombay, in Criminal Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2007

Babar Sher Khan and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-22-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(7), 52(1), 53, 55, 55(2) and 149; MHADA Act - Sections 173 and 177

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR89; 2008(2)BomCR335

Advocate for Respondent : N.V. Walawalkar, Sr. C. and; Geeta Joglekar, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 BMC.,; Ravi Kadam, A.G. and; G.W. Mattoos, Advs. and; Geeta Mulekar, AGP for Respondent No. 2-MHADA

Sathe S.R., J.1. By consent heard finally at admission stage.2. The Appellants-original plaintiffs in Notice of Motion No. 2423 of 2007 in L.C. Suit No. 2619 of 2007 have preferred this appeal against the order passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2003

Prochy Numazar Mehta Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 48A, 51A and 226; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 154(1), 328, 328(1), 328(3) and 328A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 13, 48, 48(3) and 67; Development Control Regulations Rules - Rules 48(3) and 67; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7) and 22; Gujarat Minor Mineral Rules, 1966; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Heritage Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 62(2), 67, 67(1) and 67(4); Bombay Law; Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945

Reported in : 2003(5)BomCR71

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh and ;P.A. Purandare, Advs. in Writ Petition No. 100 of 2003

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. Rule, Learned Counsel for the respondents waive service. By consent, taken up for hearing and final disposal forthwith. We have heard all the learned counsel at considerable length including the counsel on behalf...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1990

M/S. J.K. Enterprise Vs. Prithviraj Ratanchand Mehta and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115, Order 37, Rules 2 and 3; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 70

Reported in : AIR1991Bom162; 1991(1)BomCR480; (1990)92BOMLR572

Advocate for Respondent : Navin Parekh, ;R.A. Mehta, ;J.B. Patel and ;Miss N.M. Kapur, Advs.

1. The short point raised in the present Civil Revision Application is regarding the correctness or otherwise of the order dated 30th January 1989 granting conditional leave to defendant No. 1 in summary Suit No. 1785...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1996

Devkubai N. Mankar and Others Vs. Rajesh Builders and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-23-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Powers of Attorney Act, 7 of 1882 - Sections 2; B.T. and A.L. Act, 1948; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1997Bom142

Advocate for Respondent : Navin Parekh with ;H.V. Chande, Adv.

ORDERDr. SARAF, J.1. This is an appeal of the successors of original defendant No.2 from the order of the learned single Judge dated 3rd November, 1995 made in Notice of Motion No. 2284 of 1989 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial