Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: navendu kumar · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.015 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 22 2005

Baidya Nath Dubey Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-22-2005

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Bihar Service Code - Rule 97; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 307

S.K. Katriar, J.1. Heard Dr. M.P. Shukla for the petitioner, Mr. Navendu Kumar, JC to Standing Counsel No. VI, and Mr. Ajay Tripathi for the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.2. According to the writ petition, the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2003

Nand Lal Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-03-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Agricultural Produce Market Committees Act, 1960 - Sections 4, 9 and 14

Advocate for Respondent : S. Alamdar Hussain, SV VI and Navendu Kumar, JC to SC VI and Ram Balak Mahto, Ajay and Anil Kumar, Advs. for Respondent No. 5

S.N. Jha and P.M. Yadav, JJ. 1. This writ petition coming on reference by a learned Single Judge of this Court involves interpretation of Section 9 (4)(i) of the Bihar Agriculture Produce Market Committee Act, 1960...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2003

Ranvijay Kumar Patel Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-04-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 17 and 21(2)

Advocate for Respondent : Navendu Kumar, Adv.

R.S. Garg, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State Government.2. The petitioner Ranvijay Kumar Patel, Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj, Surhari has come to this Court inter-alia submitting that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 04 2004

Sitaram Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-04-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 44(4)

Advocate for Respondent : Navendu Kumar, JC to SC VI and Amresh Kumar, Adv. for the respondent No. 6

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. 1. Initially this writ application was filed for quashing the notice dated 22.2.2003 issued by the Executive Officer communicated to the members that a special meeting to consider the no confidence motion...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial