Advanced Search Results
Rotash Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Dec-06-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 33, 34, 37 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161
2007CriLJ758; 2006(13)SCALE186; 2007AIRSCW44; (2007)2SCC(Cri)382; (2007)1Crimes236(SC); 2007(2)KCCRSN57; 2007(2)AIRKarR22(SC)
Naveen Kumar Singh, ; Mukul Sood and ; Aruneshwar Gupta,
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Appellant is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment of conviction and sentence passed by a Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court, Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 765...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Chandra Tiwari, and Others. Vs. State of U.P. and Another.
Allahabad
Aug-02-2010
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482, 319; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 353, 341, 427, 504, 506; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 7
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Scope and application of Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, `the Code') is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNitin Mewari vs.the State (Gnct of Delhi)
Delhi
Apr-24-2018
Education
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1204/2017 NITIN MEWARI versus THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sukumar Chand Jain Vs. Attam Vallabh Cooperative Group Housing
Delhi
Feb-18-2015
Land Acquisition
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 18, 2015 + FAO(OS) 600/2009 SUKUMAR CHAND JAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs Sanjay Kumar Choubey and Company Thr Its Proprietor Sri Sanjay Kuma ...
Jharkhand
May-10-2016
Land Acquisition
. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 621 of 2015 …. M/s Sanjay Kumar Choubey & Company, having office at 183, Co-operative Colony, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S.-B.S. City, Town and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
May-06-2009
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1972 - Sections 113A, 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Muslim Law
AIR2009SC1454; JT2009(13)SC53; 2009(7)SCALE629; 2009AIRSCW4014; 2009(1)LHSC19
Pramod Swarup, ; Manoj Kumar Dwivedi and ; Gunnam Venkateswa
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Application of the term `soon before her death' occurring in Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) in the facts and circumstances of the present case is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVidhanshi Kamalia & Anr vs.university of Delhi & Ors
Delhi
Oct-09-2019
Right to Information
Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Mr. Kaushik Ghosh, Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Mr. Saurabh Sharma
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2019 + LPA6032019 VIDHANSHI KAMALIA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI &...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Jaggu Ram
Supreme Court of India
Jan-04-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 106 and 113B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201, 304B, 304B(1), 304B(2) and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313
AIR2008SC982; 2008(56)BLJR760; 2008CriLJ1039; I(2008)DMC207; JT2008(1)SC199; RLW2008(3)SC2584; 2008(1)SCALE22; 2008AIRSCW521; 2008(1)Crimes180; 2008(1)AICLR826; 2008(1)LH(SC)234
Badri Prasad Singh, Adv.
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.10.1999 of the learned Single Judge of Rajasthan High Court whereby he allowed the appeal preferred by respondent - Jaggu Ram and acquitted him of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrem Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Jan-07-2009
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304, 304B, 306 and 498A
AIR2009SC1242; 2009(57)BLJR777; 2009CriLJ1123; JT2009(1)SC197; RLW2009(2)SC1714; 2009(1)SCALE230; (2009)3SCC726; 2009(1)LC299(SC); 2009AIRSCW536; 2009(1)LHSC378
Naveen Kumar Singh and ; Aruneshwar Gupta, Advs.
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur allowing the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan questioning correctness of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshutosh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-30-2005
Civil
Arbitration Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96, 144 and 145 - Order 21, Rules 49, 49(2), 49(3), 49(4), 49(5), 50, 50(1), 50(2) and 58 - Order 30, Rules 6, 7 and 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 24, 25 and 30; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957
AIR2005SC3434; 2005(4)AWC3869N(SC); IV(2005)BC13(SC); 2006(1)BomCR760; 2005(4)CTC408; [2006(2)JCR155(SC)]; JT2005(8)SC58; 2005(4)KLT264(SC); (2005)7SCC308
Aruneshwar Gupta, Addl. Adv. General and ; Naveen Kumar Singh, Adv.
AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The unsuccessful appellant in S.B. Civil Execution First Appeal No. 2 of 1998 before the High Court of Rajasthan is the appellant before us by special leave. The appeal is preferred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »