Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: naveen kumar singh · Page 1 of about 41 results (0.207 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 06 2006

Rotash Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-06-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 33, 34, 37 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2007CriLJ758; 2006(13)SCALE186; 2007AIRSCW44; (2007)2SCC(Cri)382; (2007)1Crimes236(SC); 2007(2)KCCRSN57; 2007(2)AIRKarR22(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Naveen Kumar Singh, ; Mukul Sood and ; Aruneshwar Gupta,

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Appellant is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment of conviction and sentence passed by a Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court, Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 765...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2010

Subhash Chandra Tiwari, and Others. Vs. State of U.P. and Another.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482, 319; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 353, 341, 427, 504, 506; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 7

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Scope and application of Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, `the Code') is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2018

Nitin Mewari vs.the State (Gnct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-24-2018

Subject : Education

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1204/2017 NITIN MEWARI versus THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 18 2015

Sukumar Chand Jain Vs. Attam Vallabh Cooperative Group Housing

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 18, 2015 + FAO(OS) 600/2009 SUKUMAR CHAND JAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Vikas Sharma, Advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2016

Ms Sanjay Kumar Choubey and Company Thr Its Proprietor Sri Sanjay Kuma ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-10-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 621 of 2015 …. M/s Sanjay Kumar Choubey & Company, having office at 183, Co-operative Colony, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. and P.S.-B.S. City, Town and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2009

Suresh Kumar Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1972 - Sections 113A, 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Muslim Law

Reported in : AIR2009SC1454; JT2009(13)SC53; 2009(7)SCALE629; 2009AIRSCW4014; 2009(1)LHSC19

Advocate for Respondent : Pramod Swarup, ; Manoj Kumar Dwivedi and ; Gunnam Venkateswa

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Application of the term `soon before her death' occurring in Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) in the facts and circumstances of the present case is the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2019

Vidhanshi Kamalia & Anr vs.university of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-09-2019

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Mr. Kaushik Ghosh, Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Mr. Saurabh Sharma

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2019 + LPA6032019 VIDHANSHI KAMALIA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2008

State of Rajasthan Vs. Jaggu Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-04-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 106 and 113B; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201, 304B, 304B(1), 304B(2) and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : AIR2008SC982; 2008(56)BLJR760; 2008CriLJ1039; I(2008)DMC207; JT2008(1)SC199; RLW2008(3)SC2584; 2008(1)SCALE22; 2008AIRSCW521; 2008(1)Crimes180; 2008(1)AICLR826; 2008(1)LH(SC)234

Advocate for Respondent : Badri Prasad Singh, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27.10.1999 of the learned Single Judge of Rajasthan High Court whereby he allowed the appeal preferred by respondent - Jaggu Ram and acquitted him of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2009

Prem Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Evidence Act - Sections 113B and 114; Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 30, 304, 304B, 306 and 498A

Reported in : AIR2009SC1242; 2009(57)BLJR777; 2009CriLJ1123; JT2009(1)SC197; RLW2009(2)SC1714; 2009(1)SCALE230; (2009)3SCC726; 2009(1)LC299(SC); 2009AIRSCW536; 2009(1)LHSC378

Advocate for Respondent : Naveen Kumar Singh and ; Aruneshwar Gupta, Advs.

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur allowing the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan questioning correctness of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2005

Ashutosh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-30-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arbitration Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96, 144 and 145 - Order 21, Rules 49, 49(2), 49(3), 49(4), 49(5), 50, 50(1), 50(2) and 58 - Order 30, Rules 6, 7 and 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 24, 25 and 30; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR2005SC3434; 2005(4)AWC3869N(SC); IV(2005)BC13(SC); 2006(1)BomCR760; 2005(4)CTC408; [2006(2)JCR155(SC)]; JT2005(8)SC58; 2005(4)KLT264(SC); (2005)7SCC308

Advocate for Respondent : Aruneshwar Gupta, Addl. Adv. General and ; Naveen Kumar Singh, Adv.

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The unsuccessful appellant in S.B. Civil Execution First Appeal No. 2 of 1998 before the High Court of Rajasthan is the appellant before us by special leave. The appeal is preferred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial