Advanced Search Results

Medchel Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dr. D.C. Mallik an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CompanyCommercial

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197 and 258; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 284 and 617; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 209, 211, 406, 420 and 511

Reported in : [1998]94CompCas259(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : N. Natarajan, Adv. for;S. Veeraraghavan, Adv. in Crl. R.C. No. 450 of 1996 and;K.V. Sridharan, Adv. in Crl. R.C. Nos. 578, 579 and 649 to 652 of 1996

Rengasamy, J.1. All these revisions arise from the orders of the VIIth Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, in Crl. M. P. No. 1770 of 1996, in C. C. No. 5232 of 1995, and Crl. M. P....

P.R. Ramakrishnan and ors. Vs. A. Mounaguruswami

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(18A), 108, 108A, 108B, 108C, 108D, 108H, 187(2), 187C, 187C(1), 187C(2), 187C(5), 302, 307, 307(3), 308, 308(1), 308(3) and 482

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas477(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : N. Natarajan, Adv.

Natarajan, J.1. The petitioners seek quashing of the proceedings in C.C. No. 251 of 1979 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Coimbatore. The case arises out of a private complaint filed by the...

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Kasiraja Nadar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 3(2), 17 and 17(1)

Reported in : [1981]47STC337(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : C. Natarajan, Adv.

Ismail, C.J.1. In this tax revision case the point involved is whether tapioca thippi dust and the mixture of molasses with tapioca thippi dust are articles of cattle feed falling within the scope of the notification...

State of Karnataka Vs. Shaw Wallace and Company Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9(2); Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 12A and 12A(IA)

Reported in : [1998]110STC506(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : C. Natarajan, Senior Advocate and ;K.P. Kumar, Adv., for M/s King and Patridge

S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. The revision petitions are directed against the order of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal by which the Tribunal held that certain sales effected by the respondents are second sales and those transactions do...

J. Jayalalitha Vs. Her Excellency the Governor of Tamil Nadu, Raj Bhav ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India -- Articles 77, 163, 166, 258-A and 361; General Clauses Act, 1897 -- Sections 3(60); Indial Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 13, 21, 120-B, 169, 409, 420 and 477-A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 -- Sections 19 and 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 17 and 197; Constitution of India (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC493

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. N. Natarajan.;Senior Counsel for Assisted by;Public Prosecutor and;Mr. R. Balasubramaniam, Special Government Pleader

ORDERJudgement pronounced by J. Jayalalitha1. These three writ petitions have been filed by the same writ petitioner. Common contentions have been raised in all the three writ petitions. Hence, all the three writ petitions are disposed...

In Re: Rajendran and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 143, 332, 342, 365 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 317

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1956

Arunachalam, J.1. A storm, not one natural, had blown over the campus, which accommodates the Courts of certain Metropolitan Magistrates and Judicial Magistrates, in Saidapet on 26-7-1995. The unusual impact of the storm had led to...

T. Azeezur Rahman and Company Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Gen. Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 38; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5, 5(1) and (3), 14 and 15; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 15

Reported in : [1991]82STC355(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Karuppan, Additional Government Pleader (Taxes)

Raju, J. 1. The unsuccessful assessee is the appellant before us. The above tax case has been filed against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, dated 8th June, 1981 made in T.A. No....

Sneva Diamond Tools (P.) Ltd. Vs. Appellate Assistant Commissioner (Co ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 12(3), 24(3), 26 and 55

Reported in : [1989]72STC329(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : R. Lokapriya, Government Adv. (Taxes)

ORDERSwamikkannu, J.1. This is a petition for directing the first respondent to dispose of the petition dated 27th April, 1981 of the petitioners in accordance with law. 2. Mr. C. Natarajan, learned counsel for the petitioners,...

Hiralal Laxmandas Marwadi Vs. Meghraj Bhickchand Marwadi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1938Bom433; (1938)40BOMLR937

Macklin, J.1. The questions for consideration in this appeal are (1) whether the learned Judge of the trial Court was right in awarding maintenance cut of the joint family estate to an illegitimate son of a...

Murali Match Works Vs. Cegat

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35B and B(5)

Reported in : 1992(60)ELT546(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.S. Venkatachalamoorthy, Adv.

ORDER1. This writ petition has been filed to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in A. No. E/353/88/Order No. 478/88, dated 7-10-1988 and quash...