Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: narayan sahu · Page 1 of about 62 results (0.045 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 14 2010

Satyavati Ramprasad Ruia, and ors. Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Br ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-14-2010

Subject : Corporation

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Section 188, 217,

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Pakale,;Ms. Trupti Puranik,;Mr. Narayan Sahu,;Federal & Rashmikant,Advs.

1. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioners as well as learned Advocates for the Respondents.2. Rule.3. Learned Advocates appearing for the Respondents waive service.4. By consent of the parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and the Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1945

Gangadharrao Gopalrao Vs. Ramchandra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-09-1945

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1946Bom146; (1945)47BOMLR889

Lokur, J.1. These two appeals arise out of a suit filed by the plaintiff to recover a moiety of the properties described in the plaint at serial Nos. 1 to 30 after a partition by metes...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1943

Bammangouda Shankargouda Patil Vs. Shankargouda Rangangouda Patil

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-15-1943

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR1944Bom67; (1943)45BOMLR1021

Divatia, J.1. [His Lordship after setting out the facts and dealing with the other points in the appeals proceeded :]2. That brings us to the last point as to the alleged severance of interest between defendant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 22 2003

Sebi Vs. Shri Dilip S. Pendse

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Dec-22-2003

Subject : Service Tax

1.1. Shri Dilip S Pendse (hereinafter referred to as "Shri Pendse") was the Managing Director of Tata Finance Limited (hereinafter referred to as "TFL") from 01.06.96 to 31.5.2001 and director of Niskalp Investments and Trading Co....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 2008

Ranchi Nagar Nigam Pensioners Samaj Through Its Secretary Vs. State of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-10-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR301(Jhr)]

R.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard the parlies at length.2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 27.3.2004 passed by the respondent No. 2 (Annexure-5) rejecting petitioner's representation and confirming the order dated 16.2.2000...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1985

Narayan Sahu and ors. Vs. Ram Chandra Sahu and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-18-1985

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Sections 22A

Reported in : AIR1985Ori145

Advocate for Respondent : P.V. Ramdas, ;R. Mohanty, ;N. Patra, ;N.C. Panigrahi, ;B.K. Nayak, ;Bhimsen Sahu, Advs. (for No. 1) and ;Addl. Standing Counsel (for Nos. 2 and 3)

R.C. Patnaik, J.1. One NarayanSahu, since deceased and substituted by hislegal representatives, filed an application underSection 15 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act on 4-12-1972 for a declaration that he was tenant ofthe land measuring 8.14...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2000

Suresh Sahu and ors. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jun-27-2000

Subject : Criminal

Anil Kumar Sinha, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order of conviction, sentence dated 19.6.93 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gulma in Sessions Trial No. 218/91, whereby and whereunder he convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2006

Commissioner of Customs (import) Vs. S.C. Gupta

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-27-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28(1), 143A, 124, 129A(4), 129B, 129D, 129D(4), 130A, 130A(1) and 180; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35C, 35H and 35H(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256, 256(1) and 256(2); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 27(2) and 27(3); Bombay Sales Tax Act - Sections 39, 43, 43(1) and 61; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29; Limitation Act, 1908; Limitation Act, 1965 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Haryana General Sales Tax Act; Rent Act; Sales Tax Act; Special Courts (Trial of offences relating to transactions in securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3(2), 4(2), 10(3) and 13

Reported in : 2007(207)ELT377(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Narayan Sahu, ;S.T. Shaikh, ;Tasneem Saria, ;Nitin Pradhan, Advs., i/b, ;S.K. Srivastava and Co.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard Mr. Jetly in support of this Application and Mr. Sahu for Respondent No. 8. Ms. Saria appears for Respondent No. 14.2. This is an application by the Commissioner of Customs (Import) for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2005

Navyug Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Vile Parle Kelavani Ma ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 33, 33(1) and 33(2); Presidency Small Causes Court Act; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 1(4), 50, 51 and 56; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 41 and 41(1); Bombay Rents, Hotel Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28 and 28(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9A

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR579

Advocate for Respondent : Rohit Kapadia, ;S.K. Srivastav, ;Narayan Sahu and ;Chetna Vyas, Advs. i/b., S.K. Srivastav & Co. for defendant No. 1 and Vijay Tulzapurkar, ;Sandip Parikh and ;Nishant Thakkar, Advs. i/b., Mahenov

Deshmukh D.K., J.1. In this suit, by order dated 3rd February, 2005 two preliminary issues have been framed in accordance with the provisions of Section 9-A of Civil Procedure Code, which read as under :-'(i) Does...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2007

Surendra Kapoor Vs. Prabir Kumar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-21-2007

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 4, 16, 16(2) and 34; Arbitration Act, 1940; Suits Valuation Act - Sections 11; Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR97(Bom); 2007(4)BomCR345; 2007(4)MhLj700

Advocate for Respondent : Narayan Sahu, Adv., ;i/b., ;S.K. Shrivastav and Co.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard. This appeal arises from the order dated 06.03.2007 passed in Chamber Summons No. 148 of 2007. By the impugned order, the Chamber Summons No. 148 of 2007 taken out by the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial