Advanced Search Results
Satyavati Ramprasad Ruia, and ors. Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Br ...
Mumbai
Jul-14-2010
Corporation
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Section 188, 217,
Mr. S.S. Pakale,;Ms. Trupti Puranik,;Mr. Narayan Sahu,;Federal & Rashmikant,Advs.
1. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioners as well as learned Advocates for the Respondents.2. Rule.3. Learned Advocates appearing for the Respondents waive service.4. By consent of the parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and the Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGangadharrao Gopalrao Vs. Ramchandra
Mumbai
Mar-09-1945
Family
AIR1946Bom146; (1945)47BOMLR889
Lokur, J.1. These two appeals arise out of a suit filed by the plaintiff to recover a moiety of the properties described in the plaint at serial Nos. 1 to 30 after a partition by metes...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBammangouda Shankargouda Patil Vs. Shankargouda Rangangouda Patil
Mumbai
Mar-15-1943
FamilyProperty
AIR1944Bom67; (1943)45BOMLR1021
Divatia, J.1. [His Lordship after setting out the facts and dealing with the other points in the appeals proceeded :]2. That brings us to the last point as to the alleged severance of interest between defendant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sebi Vs. Shri Dilip S. Pendse
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Dec-22-2003
Service Tax
1.1. Shri Dilip S Pendse (hereinafter referred to as "Shri Pendse") was the Managing Director of Tata Finance Limited (hereinafter referred to as "TFL") from 01.06.96 to 31.5.2001 and director of Niskalp Investments and Trading Co....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanchi Nagar Nigam Pensioners Samaj Through Its Secretary Vs. State of ...
Jharkhand
Jun-10-2008
Service
[2008(3)JCR301(Jhr)]
R.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard the parlies at length.2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 27.3.2004 passed by the respondent No. 2 (Annexure-5) rejecting petitioner's representation and confirming the order dated 16.2.2000...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Sahu and ors. Vs. Ram Chandra Sahu and ors.
Orissa
Mar-18-1985
PropertyCivil
Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Sections 22A
AIR1985Ori145
P.V. Ramdas, ;R. Mohanty, ;N. Patra, ;N.C. Panigrahi, ;B.K. Nayak, ;Bhimsen Sahu, Advs. (for No. 1) and ;Addl. Standing Counsel (for Nos. 2 and 3)
R.C. Patnaik, J.1. One NarayanSahu, since deceased and substituted by hislegal representatives, filed an application underSection 15 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act on 4-12-1972 for a declaration that he was tenant ofthe land measuring 8.14...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Sahu and ors. Vs. State of Bihar
Patna
Jun-27-2000
Criminal
Anil Kumar Sinha, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order of conviction, sentence dated 19.6.93 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gulma in Sessions Trial No. 218/91, whereby and whereunder he convicted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (import) Vs. S.C. Gupta
Mumbai
Jul-27-2006
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28(1), 143A, 124, 129A(4), 129B, 129D, 129D(4), 130A, 130A(1) and 180; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35C, 35H and 35H(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256, 256(1) and 256(2); Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 27, 27(2) and 27(3); Bombay Sales Tax Act - Sections 39, 43, 43(1) and 61; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29; Limitation Act, 1908; Limitation Act, 1965 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2); Haryana General Sales Tax Act; Rent Act; Sales Tax Act; Special Courts (Trial of offences relating to transactions in securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3(2), 4(2), 10(3) and 13
2007(207)ELT377(Bom)
Narayan Sahu, ;S.T. Shaikh, ;Tasneem Saria, ;Nitin Pradhan, Advs., i/b, ;S.K. Srivastava and Co.
H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard Mr. Jetly in support of this Application and Mr. Sahu for Respondent No. 8. Ms. Saria appears for Respondent No. 14.2. This is an application by the Commissioner of Customs (Import) for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNavyug Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Vile Parle Kelavani Ma ...
Mumbai
Mar-10-2005
Tenancy
Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 33, 33(1) and 33(2); Presidency Small Causes Court Act; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 1(4), 50, 51 and 56; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 41 and 41(1); Bombay Rents, Hotel Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28 and 28(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9A
2005(3)BomCR579
Rohit Kapadia, ;S.K. Srivastav, ;Narayan Sahu and ;Chetna Vyas, Advs. i/b., S.K. Srivastav & Co. for defendant No. 1 and Vijay Tulzapurkar, ;Sandip Parikh and ;Nishant Thakkar, Advs. i/b., Mahenov
Deshmukh D.K., J.1. In this suit, by order dated 3rd February, 2005 two preliminary issues have been framed in accordance with the provisions of Section 9-A of Civil Procedure Code, which read as under :-'(i) Does...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurendra Kapoor Vs. Prabir Kumar
Mumbai
Mar-21-2007
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 4, 16, 16(2) and 34; Arbitration Act, 1940; Suits Valuation Act - Sections 11; Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952
2007(3)ARBLR97(Bom); 2007(4)BomCR345; 2007(4)MhLj700
Narayan Sahu, Adv., ;i/b., ;S.K. Shrivastav and Co.
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard. This appeal arises from the order dated 06.03.2007 passed in Chamber Summons No. 148 of 2007. By the impugned order, the Chamber Summons No. 148 of 2007 taken out by the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »