Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: narasimha murthy · Page 1 of about 718 results (0.203 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 11 1996

Advocates' Association, Bangalore Vs. the Chief Minister, Government o ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-11-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 39A, 202(3) and 226; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 32, 33, 34, 36, 38, 49(1) - Rules 1, 2, 4, 11, 12, 15, 16, 34, 35, 36, 46, 47, 48 and 49

Reported in : AIR1997Kant18; 1997(1)KarLJ474

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Narasimha Murthy, Sr. Counsel, assisted the Court as Amicus Curiae. S. Udayashankar, Addl. Govt. Adv.

ORDER1. This petition is presented by the Advocates Association, Bangalore, which is a premier association of Advocates in Karnataka State (which is hereinafter referred to as the 'Association'). The petitioner-association has sought for a direction to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2005

P.K. Shanbhag Vs. Karnataka Soaps and Detergents Limited

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-12-2005

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; ;Karnataka Soaps and Detergents Limited (Conduct and Discipline) Rules, 1984 - Rule 2

Reported in : 2005(5)KarLJ84

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Narasimha Murthy, Sr. Adv. for ;M.H. Motigi, Adv.

R. Gururajan, J.1. Petitioner is before me challenging the show-cause notice-cum-charge-sheet dated 5-10-2004 and the subsequent order of suspension dated 12-11-2004.2. Petitioner was working as Director Technical. The said post was upgraded to Executive Director and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2006

H.G. Sheela Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-24-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 - Sections 2(6), 3, 3(1), 4C, 13, 28(1), 28(4), 28(6) and 41(2); Companies Act, 1956; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3), 14A and 19; Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 19(4); Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2, 3, 38A, 38A(1) and 38(2); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 14, 16, 21 and 226; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Act - Sections 126(2); Bombay Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, 1974 - Sections 126; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5A, 17(1), 17(4) and 57; Cyprus Emergency Powers (Collective Punishment) Regulations, 1955

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ24

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Hatti, High Court Government Pleader for Respondent 1, R.N. Narasimha Murthy, Senior Counsel for S.T. Mahesh, Adv. for Caveator Respondent 2 and 3, Jayakumar S. Patil, Senior Counsel for H.C. Kav

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. By consent of the learned Counsels for the parties these writ petitions were heard together and disposed of by this common order as the lands involved are same and common questions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 17 1996

Advocates' Association Vs. Chief Minister, Government of Karnataka and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-17-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39A and 226; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 29, 32 to 35 and 49(1)

Reported in : ILR1997KAR221

Advocate for Respondent : S. Udayashankar, Additional Government Adv.

ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. This petition is presented by the Advocates Association, Bangalore, which is a premier association of Advocates in Karnataka State, ( which is hereinafter referred to as the 'Association'). The petitioner Association has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1964

State of Mysore Vs. Narasimhe Gowda N.G. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-20-1964

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 251A(11) and 342

Reported in : AIR1965Kant167; AIR1965Mys167; 1965CriLJ48; (1964)2MysLJ241

T.K. Tukol, J. (1) This is an appeal by the State against the order of acquittal passed by the Munsiff Magistrate, Holenarasipur, on 30-5-1963 in Criminal Case No. 132 of 1963 on his file.(2) The facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1992

Bommegowda Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-25-1992

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 40, 162, 226 and 246; ;Karnataka Zilla Parishads, Taluk Panchayat Samitis, Mandal Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayats Act, 1983 - Sections 8(1) 39, 40, 44(2) 272A and 287(2); ; Karnataka Zilla Parishads, Taluk Panchayat Samitis, Mandal Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayats (Amendment) Act, 1992

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3148

Advocate for Respondent : P.P. Muthanna, Adv. General, ;T.S. Ranachandra, Adv., ;S.G. Sundaraswamy, ;R.N. Narasimha Shetty and ;B.V. Acharya, Sr. Counsel and ;B.L. Acharya, Adv.

ORDERShyamasundar, J. 1. These and other connected Writ Petitions running into two or three thousand in number are directed against four common entities who are arrayed as respondents in these Writ Petitions, their commonness extending even...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2003

S.M. Rao and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-06-2003

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 28; Indian Telegraphy Act, 1985 - Sections 51; Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 2C(1) and 14(2)

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4678

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Prasad, HCGP for R1, R2 and R7, ;N.K. Gupta, Adv. for R1 to R3 and R4, ;Jayanth M. Pattanshetty, Adv. for R5, ;K.S. Vinay, ;G.S. Srinivas, ;Vishwanath and ;Supiya R. Lupane, Advs. for R4 and R5

Nayak, J.1. What arises for decision in these Writ Appeals and Writ Petition is the validity of the proposal/action of the Karnataka Electricity Board (for short 'the Board') in erecting high tension line over the lands...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2004

Bamdev Nayak Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-19-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2004(3)KarLJ435

Advocate for Respondent : V.Y. Kumar, Government Adv. for Respondent 1, ;L. Govindaraj, Adv. for Respondent 2, ;S. Mahesh, Adv. for Respondent 3, ;H.K. Vasudeva Reddy, Adv. for Respondent 4 in W.P. No. 41444 of 2003 and ;Kesvy

ORDERH. Rangavittalachar, J.1. Since common questions of law is involved in both the writ petitions, they are disposed of by this common order. Facts will be referred to with reference to W.P. No. 41444 of 2003.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1997

Shaw Wallace and Company Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Ta ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-14-1997

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5(3) and 12A

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2730

Advocate for Respondent : R.I.D.'Sa and ;H.G. Ramesh, Government Advs.

ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. In these petitions, the petitioner has prayed for quashing three notices dated November 7, 1987, copies of which have been produced as annexures A1 to A3 and notice dated December 30, 1992,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1988

State of Karnataka Vs. Anjanappa and Co.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-01-1988

Subject : Excise

Acts : Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 - Sections 71(4); Karnataka Excise Licenses Rules, 1967 - Rule 15

Reported in : ILR1988KAR1695; 1988(2)KarLJ118

Advocate for Respondent : P. Vishwanatha Shetty, Adv., ;Hegde Associates, ;A. Jagannatha Shetty, ;C.V. Guruve Gowda, ;N.Y. Hanumanthappa, ;R.S. Hegde, ;K.S. Vyasarao, ;M.H. Sawkar, Advs., ;King and Patridge, ;J.V. Halsoor, ;M.

ORDERPrem Chand Jain, C.J.1. These batches of Writ Appeals are disposed of by this judgment as a common question of law arises in all these appeals.2. The respondents ere all Excise Contractors. They are aggrieved by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial