Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: nand kishore prasad · Page 1 of about 144 results (0.100 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 26 1968

Arbind Kumar Singh Vs. Nand Kishore Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-26-1968

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Bihar Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 64; Bihar Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Articles 133(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1968SC1227; 1969(17)BLJR669; [1968]3SCR322

Shah, J. 1. On January 15, 1965, the South Bihar Regional Transport Authority, Patna, ordered that a permit to ply a stage carriage on Dehri-Bhabua route be granted to Arbind Kumar Singh - hereinafter called 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2015

Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharathi S ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-09-2015

Subject : MRTP

(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.43825/2014 dated 9.10.2014.) 1. This appeal seeks to challenge the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1978

Nand Kishore Prasad Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-1978

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 466, 468, 474 and 477A

Reported in : AIR1978SC1277; 1978(26)BLJR280; (1978)IILLJ84SC; (1978)3SCC366; [1978]3SCR708; 1978(1)SLJ591(SC); 1978(10)LC395(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : R.C. Prasad, Adv.

1. This is an appeal by certificate under Article 133(1)(a) and (b) of the Constitution from a Judgment dated July 28, 1966 of the Patna High Court, dismissing the appellant's writ petition under Article 226 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 19 1998

Chandrika Singh and ors. Vs. Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Patn ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-19-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1962 - Sections 16, 16(3) and 33; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12; Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act, 1917 - Sections 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Advocate for Respondent : Nand Kishore Prasad II, Adv.S.J. Rahman, SC (Ceiling)

Sachchidanand Jha, J. 1. This writ petition arises from a proceeding under Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961, called 'the Act' in short. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2009

indore Development Authority Vs. Shri Ram Builders and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009MP169

Dipak Misra, J.1. Questioning the defensibility and substantiality of the order dated 14-8-2007 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 14605/ 2006, the present intra-Court appeal has been preferred under Section 2(1) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2015

Bijit Baruah and Another Vs. Indian Council of Child Welfare, New Delh ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-03-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Judgment and Order (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. G.P. Bhowmik, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant in both the appeals and Ms. M. Hazarika, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents in both the appeals. 2. RSA No.98/2008...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2016

Vijay Balu Navarkar Vs. Jalgaon Janata Sahakari Bank Limited and Anoth ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Apr-11-2016

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties. 2. Rule. 3. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner / employee is aggrieved...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2005

Gurushanth Pattedar Vs. Mahaboob Shahi Kulburga Mills and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-30-2005

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 228; ;Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 9 and 10; ;Industrial Disputes Act; ;Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 1973; Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rules 2 and 26; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR2005Kant377; ILR2005KAR2503; 2005(6)KarLJ270

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Ramesh and ;C.L. Feroze, Advs., ;B.S. Ravi Kumar and ;Irfan, Advs. for C/R-1 and ;Niranjan Kumar, Adv. for C/R-2

N.K. Sodhi, C.J.1. The short question that arises for the consideration of this Full Bench is whether an order passed by a learned single Judge in a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2011

NitIn Shantilal Bhagat and 1 Vs State of Gujarat Through B R Choksi

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-10-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226, ; Indian High Courts Act, 1861 - 104.

1. The present controversy relates to an important question `whether an intra-court appeal (Letters Patent Appeal) under clause 15 of the Letters Patent is maintainable against an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2013

Sobram Gope Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-19-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 5979 of 2011 Sobram Gope ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial