Advanced Search Results

Jagjit Singh Uppal and ors. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 16; Railway Establishment Code, 1951 - Rules 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR1971Delhi155

Advocate for Respondent : R.B. Nanak Chand, Adv.

1. This petition is directed against orders made by a letter of 26th July, 1966 emanating from the Divisional Superintendent, Northern Railway, New Delhi by which the petitioners have been informed that their names have been...

Gura Singh and anr. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : RLW2009(4)Raj2910

N.P. Gupta, J.1. The two appellants have filed this appeal against the judgment of learned Addl. Sessions Judge (F.T.), Hanumangarh dt. 7.5.2003 convicting them for the offence under Section 302 IPC simplicitor, and sentencing each of...

Collector of Moradabad Vs. Maqbul-ul-rahman and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1918All194(2); (1918)ILR40All434

Piggott, J.1. This was a suit on a mortgage, dated the 20th of November, 1911. The persons impleaded are the mortgagor and certain subsequent transferees. The mortgage was in favour of one Sahu Prasadi Lai. The...

The Collector of Moradabad as Manager Vs. M. Maqbul-ul-rahman and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 45Ind.Cas.37

Piggott, J.1. This was a suit on a mortgage, dated the 20th of November 1911. The persons impleaded are the mortgagor and certain subsequent transferees. The mortgage was in favour of one Saha Parshadi Lal. The...

Hukam Chand Vs. Om Chand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyTenancy

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22 Rule 10; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 2(f), 13

Reported in : (2001)10SCC715; MANU/SC/1200/2001

R.C. Lahoti and; Brijesh Kumar, JJ.1. The land in suit is owned by one Abdul Hamid Khan. In the year 1957, Om Chand, Respondent 2, obtained a lease for 99 years from the owner. On 29-3-1957,...

Nanak Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 16(1) and 311(2); Railway Establishment Code - Rules 156, 2003, 2003(5), 2003(17), 2046 and 2046(2)

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi71

Advocate for Respondent : R.B. Nanak Chand, Adv.

T.V.R. Tatachari, J. 1. The petitioner, Nanak Singh, has filed this writ petition under Art. 226 of the constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to forebear from...

Harmohinder Singh and anr. Vs. General Manager, Northern Railway and o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Establishment Code - Rule 2017

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi56

Advocate for Respondent : Nanak Chand, Adv.

(1) This judgment will dispose of Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 148-D of 1965 (Harmohinder Singh v. General Manager, Northern Railway and tohers and 153-D of 1965 (K. Audiseshan v. General manager, Northern Railway and tohers). The...

Rajendra Prasad Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR2004Utr6; 2004(1)AWC913(UHC)

Advocate for Respondent : Nanak Chand Gupta, S.C.

ORDERRajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri K. S. Verma for the petitioner arid Sri Nanak Chand Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed...

Sidhu Ram Bhoja Ram Vs. the Secretary, Railway Board, Ministry of Rail ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 1731 and 1732

Reported in : AIR1967P& H383

Advocate for Respondent : Nanak Chand, Adv.

S.K. Kapur, J.1. By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the validity of an order dated 25th June, 1962, (Annexure 'J' to the petition), imposing on the petitioner a penalty of removal from service with...

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment) Vs. Anil Kumar. (Anil K ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)58TTJ(Del)340

ORDERJ. P. BENGRA, J.M. :There is an appeal by Revenue and cross-appeal and cross-objection by assessed against single order of the CIT(A) pertaining to asst. yr. 1987-88. Since all these matters arise out of a single...