Advanced Search Results

Ramchandra Vs. Manikchand and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : FamilyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1968MP150

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Pandey, Adv.

Bhave, J.1. This appeal is by the defendant. The trial Court has passed a decree for specific performance.2. The suit was filed by the plaintiffs (respondents 1 and 2), when they were minors, through their guardian....

Hussainbhai Mulla Fida HussaIn Vs. Motilal Nathulal and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 2, 6 and 9; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(23), 54 and 55

Reported in : AIR1963Bom208; (1963)65BOMLR152; 1963MhLJ312

Advocate for Respondent : M.N. Chandurkar, Adv.

Patel, J. 1. The question in this case is whether the respondents were common carriers and liable as such in respect of the goods belonging to the plaintiff and which they were carrying from Nagpur to...

Brajamohan Panda Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 5; Orissa Land Acquisition Act, 1948 - Sections 2(2), 2(3), 3, 3(2), 3(3) and 13; Constitution of India - Article 300; Govt. of India Act, 1915 - Sections 32; Govt. of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 176

Reported in : AIR1961Ori124

Advocate for Respondent : Govt. Adv.

Misra, J.1.The plaintiff's suit of 1951, claiming damage at Rs. 60,000/- against the State of Orissa, having been dismissed, he has Come up in the present appeal. The plaintiff's case is that villages Ranga-lipali and Raghunathpali...

Kadamba Sugar Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Devru Ganapathi Hedg ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Contract

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 39, 47, 52, 62, 74, 75, 91, 92 and 100; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 69 and 140; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 244 - Order 1, Rule 10(6) - Order 2, Rule 1 - Order 21, Rule 2 - Order 22, Rule 10 - Order 34, Rules 4 and 5;

Reported in : AIR1993Kant288; ILR1993KAR679; 1993(1)KarLJ285

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. Tarakaram

1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 23-3-1990 passed on I.A. No. II by the Civil Judge, Sirsi in FDP No. 2/1987. By the said order the learned Civil Judge allowed the application at...

Channu Singh Vs. Khem Karan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60(1)

Reported in : AIR1961All566

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Gupta, Adv.

J.K. Tandon, J.1. Two questions have been raised in the grounds of appeal in this second appeal. One is that the word 'occupation' used in Section 60 C. P. C. does not necessarily require actual physical...

Beni Madhavprasad and ors. Vs. Rasklal Ambalal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 49; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144

Reported in : AIR1959MP23

Advocate for Respondent : D.C. Bharucha, Adv.

P.V. Dixit, J.1. The suit, out of which this appeal arises, was instituted by the present appellant's father Ramratanlal in the Court of Civil Judge, First Class, Mhow, against the respondents for the recovery of possession...

Laxminarayan and ors. Vs. Shivanarayan

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7; Madhya Pradesh Suits Valuation Rules; Suit Valuation Act, 1887

Reported in : AIR1968MP74

Advocate for Respondent : R.G. Mukati, Adv.

K.L. Pandey, J. 1. This case comes before us on a reference made by Tare J. (or resolving the disharmony between Hiralal v. Nilkanth, Civil Revn. No. 14 of 1951 D/- 18-12-1951 decided by V. R....

Malji S/O Kesooramji and ors. Vs. Kesrimal Rakhabdas and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1963MP206

ORDER1. This revision petition raises a question as regards the applicability of Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court Fees Act. Particularly it raises the question as to whether a person who is not bound by the decree...

Anshiram Vs. Tax Recovery Commissioner and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Schedule - Rules 56, 60, 61, 62 and 63; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 22, 66, 90 and 92; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1983]142ITR6(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : B.K. Rawat, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 and ;B.L. Nema and ;A.S. Jha, Advs. for respondent No. 3

G.P. Singh, C.J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks quashing of the auction sale of his house held on 14th February, 1972, for recovery of arrears of income-tax. 2....

Phoolchand and ors. Vs. Laxminarain

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ContractLimitation

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 211 and 213; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 65, 89 and 90; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 3, 4 and 27

Reported in : AIR1967Raj151

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Chanda and; Lekh Raj, Advs.

Kan Singh, J.1. This is a defendant's second appeal and is directed against an appellate Judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Jodhpur dated 2nd May, 1961 whereby in dismissing the defendant's appeal against the...