Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: n sukumaran · Page 1 of about 754 results (0.156 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 01 2008

John C.V. Alias John Peruvanthanam Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-01-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Kerala Forest (Vesting and Management of Ecologically Fragile) Act, 2003; Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 - Sections 8; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Kerala Forest Act, 1961 - Sections 27, 27(1), 27(4) and 84; Prevention of Corruption Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 36, 154, 154(1), 154(3), 156(3), 190, 200, 203 and 482; The Kerala Forest (Vesting and Management of Ecologically Fragile Land) Ordinance, 2000 - Sections 3(1) and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1305

Advocate for Respondent : P.G. Thampi, Director General of Prosecution,; P.N. Sukumaran, P.P. and;

ORDERV. Ramkumar, J.1. Whether a writ in the nature of mandamus or an appropriate direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be issued by the High Court against the officer in-charge of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1993

State of Kerala Vs. Kolakkacan Moosa Haji and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-17-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 36, 154 to 157, 173(8), 190, 482 and 551; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT(Cri)567; 1994CriLJ1288

Advocate for Respondent : M.K. Damodaran, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; M.N. Sukumaran Nayar,;

ORDERK.T. Thomas, J.1. Can a magistrate, while ordering under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code'), direct the Inspector General of Police to conduct the investigation? Answer to this question would...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1999

N. Harihara Iyer Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-10-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 139, 142, 190 and 192; Banking, Public Financial Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 192, 200, 202, 203 and 204

Reported in : 2000CriLJ1251

Advocate for Respondent : K. Gopalakrishna Kurup, Public Prosecutor and M.N. Sukumaran Nair, Sr. Adv.

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The complainant before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam, in complaints filed under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure alleging an offence under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 20 2008

Biju Purushothaman Vs. the State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-20-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Evidence Act - Sections 145, 155(3), 157 and 159; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 156(1), 156(3), 157, 162, 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 202(2), 203, 204, 204(1) and 204(4)

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4488; 2008(2)KLJ625

Advocate for Respondent : P.N. Sukumaran, PP

ORDERV. Ramkumar, J.1. The Revision Petitioner who is the 2nd accused in a private complaint filed by the 2nd respondent herein as Crl.M.P. No. 588 of 2006 before the Court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2008

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Medical Trust Hospital and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-28-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132(4), 234B, 234C and 260A

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(Ker)166

Advocate for Respondent : N. Sukumaran,; S. Shyam and; Bobby Mathew Koothattukulam

C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J.1. This appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Tribunal confirming first appellate order cancelling assessment pertaining to capital gains on sale...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2001

C.V. Dayanandan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 269A, 269B, 269C and 269F

Reported in : [2002]255ITR174(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : George K. George,; M.N. Sukumaran Nayar and; P.K.R. Meno

G. Sivarajan, J.1. The petitioner was the proprietor of a jewellery by name 'Subhash Jewellery' in Payyannur. The fifth respondent is also conducting a jewellery business by name 'Pavithram' in Payyannur. They are first cousins. According...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1991

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. M. Sreedharan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-05-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 129, 271(1) and 274

Reported in : [1991]190ITR604(Ker)

Advocate for Respondent : N. Sukumaran and; S. Ananthasubramonyan, Advs.

K.S. Paripoornan, J. 1. These are connected cases. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (in short, 'the Tribunal') has referred the following two questions of law for the decision of this court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2003

Veega Holidays and Parks (P) Ltd. Vs. Kunnathunad Grama Panchayat

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Local Authorities Entertainment Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 3

Reported in : AIR2004Ker168; 2003(3)KLT442

Advocate for Respondent : N. Sukumaran,; S. Shyam, Advs. and; Raju Joseph, Gov

Jawahar Lal Gupta, C.J. 1. Is the appellant company, which is running an 'Amusement Park' liable to pay 'Entertainment Tax' to the respondent-Panchayat? Is the appellant's 'Park' liable to be closed on account of the failure...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2015

Deepti Rajan Vs. R. Rajasekhar

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-18-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Sri. N. Sukumaran

C.K. Abdul Rehim, J. The above Matrimonial Appeal, instituted under Section 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is against an order passed by the Family Court, Kollam in IA No 907/2014 in OP (HMA)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2016

Gajendran Vs. State rep. by Inspector of Police, SPE/CBI/ACB/Chennai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-19-2016

Subject : Right to Information

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 29.03.2007 in C.C.No.2 of 2005 on the file of the II Additional District Court, CBI Cases, Coimbatore.) This Criminal Appeal is filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial