Advanced Search Results

Pandharinath Shridhar Rangnekar Vs. Dy. Commr. of Police, the State of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 56 and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 107 and 110

Reported in : AIR1973SC630; 1973CriLJ612; 1973MhLJ413(SC); (1973)1SCC372; [1973]3SCR63

Advocate for Respondent : M.C Bhandare and ;B.V. Sharma Advs.

Y.V. Chandrachud, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated August 11, 1971 of the High Court at Bombay, dismissing the petition filed by the appellant under Articles 226 and 227 of...

A. Vs. H.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 20

Reported in : AIR1993Bom70; (1992)94BOMLR154

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Joshi, Adv.

ORDERN. D. Vyas, J. 1. This is an appeal preferred by the appellant wife from the judgment and order of the Family Court, Pune, granting divorce to the respondent husband. This appeal raises an important question,...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Khimline Pumps Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37

Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR444; (2002)4BOMLR876; 2002(4)MhLj546

Advocate for Respondent : N.S. Joshi, Adv., i/b., ;Udwadia Udeshi, Adv.

S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal dated 25th July, 2000 in Income Tax Appeal No. 335/MUM/97 for Assessment Year 1991-92, the Department has filed this Appeal under Section 260A of...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vikram A. Doshi and Ms. Leena V. Doshi

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 158B and 260A

Reported in : [2002]256ITR129(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : J.D. Mistry, ;A.K. Jasani and ;N.S. Joshi, Advs.

1. Heard rival parties. 2. Parties to both appeals are different but issues involved are identical. So, one single order will dispose of both appeals. 3. These are appeals filed by the Revenue. In the appeals...

Smt. Geeta Shridhar Gadre Shramadham Vs. Brahman Shikshan Mandal Throu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 33, 35, 35(1), 35(2) and 35(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR278]

Advocate for Respondent : B.D. Joshi, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;V.A. Sonpal, Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 2 to 3

R.M. Savant, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was headmistress of a school run by the Respondent No. 1 Trust has claimed various reliefs; the sum...

Cit Vs. Indian Hotels Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]119TAXMAN122(Bom)

The assessee is a company. The assessee owns Taj Group of Hotels. In this reference we are concerned with the assessment year 1980-81 corresponding to the previous year ending 31-3-1980. The assessee paid remuneration to its...

Cit Vs. Khimline Pumps Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]125TAXMAN104(Bom)

S.H. Kapadia, J. Being aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal dated 25-7-2000 in IT Appeal No. 335 (Mum) of 1997 for the assessment year 1991-92, the department has filed this appeal under section 260A of...