Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: n m lahiri · Page 1 of about 87 results (0.059 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 12 2005

Kushum Lata Kala Vs. Kumari Parul Saha

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-12-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972 - Sections 5(4); Specific Relief Act

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Lahiri, N. Choudhury, R.C. Paul and S. Ghose, Advs.

A.M. Saikia, J.1. This revision petition has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 7.8.2001 passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Dhubri in T.A. No. 60/2000 setting aside the judgment and decree dated 11.9.2000...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 1997

Assam State Electricity Board Guwahati and ors. Vs. Borjalinga Tea Com ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-10-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Lahiri and N. Chaudhury, Advs.

J.N. Sarma, J. 1. This First Appeal has beenfiled against the judgment and decree dated 9-8-96 passed by the learned Asstt. District Judge No.2, Cachar at Silchar decreeing the suit by which,the penal bills as mentioned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2003

Atul Ch. Sarma Vs. President, District Consumer Disputes Redressal For ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Dec-22-2003

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1)

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Lahiri, Adv.

A.H. Saikia, J. 1. The legality mid validity of initiation of a proceeding against a practising Advocate by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum on the basis of a complaint lodged against him claiming compensation for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 09 2000

Hills Syndicate Vs. North Cachar Hills Autonomous Council and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-09-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 162 and 226; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Assam Forest Regulation, 1891

Advocate for Respondent : B.D. Das, S.C., N.M. Lahiri, Sr. Counsel, N. Choudhury, S.C. Kayal, B.W. Phira and PCS Bordololoi, Advs.

A.K. Patnaik, J. 1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for directions on the respondents to issue necessary work order for operating in the Langting West Region Coupe Nos....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1999

Binita Senapati Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-06-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 26, 31, 32, 33, 35, 39 and 41; Medical College of Assam and Regional Dental College (Regulation of Admission of Under Graduate Students) Rules, 1996 - Rules 3, 3(2) and 6

Advocate for Respondent : Government Advocate, Mr. N.M. Lahiri, Amicus Curiae and Mr. N. Choudhury, Adv.

1. This writ application has been filed by a person who is handicapped. She is suffering from shortening of the right lower limb, with moderate stiffness of the right hip. Her percentage of disability is 45%...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1999

Binita Senapati Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-06-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 26, 31, 32, 33, 35, 39 and 41;; Medical College of Assam and Regional Dental College (Regulation of Admission of Under Graduate Students) Rules, 1996 - Rules 3, 3(2) and 6

Reported in : AIR2000Gau1

Advocate for Respondent : Government Advocate, Mr. N.M. Lahiri, ;Amicus Curiae and ;Mr. N. Choudhury, Adv.

1. This writ application has been filed by a person who is handicapped. She is suffering from shortening of the right lower limb, with moderate stiffness of the right hip. Her percentage of disability is 45%...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 1994

Holiram Terang Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-05-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 50, 94, 163 and 227

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Lahiri, S.N. Bhuyan and A.M. Mazumdar, Adv. Generals, A.H. Saikia, Central Govt. Standing Counsel, A.K. Choudhury, Govt. Adv.

Phukan, C.J. Actg. 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has Ministers of the State of Assam and at present he is a sitting member of the State Assembly. It has been stated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1991

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Ka Drostimon Jana

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Nov-22-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Lahiri, G.N. Sahewalla and H.S. Thangkhiw, Advs.

B.P. Saraf, J. 1. At the instance of the Commissioner, the following question has been referred to us by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Gauhati, under Section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1992

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cachar Native Joint Stock Ltd.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Feb-25-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72 and 72(1)

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Lahiri, S. Dutta and K.K. Dey, Advs.

S.N. Phukan, J. 1. The following question has been referred for the opinion of this court under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the prayer of the Revenue. The question runs as follows :...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2001

Aravind Goekna and anr. Vs. Sushila Devi Tibrewalla and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-19-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Advocate for Respondent : N.M. Lahiri, N. Chouhdury, S.C. Koyal and S.K. Ghosh, Advs.

Ranjan Gogoi, J. 1. Aggrieved by the grant of injunction, the instant appeal has been preferred by the principal defendants in Title Suit No. 6(SH)/2001 now pending before the learned Assistant District Judge, Shillong. The facts,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial