Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: n k gupta · Page 1 of about 1,407 results (0.148 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 30 2003

Satya Narayan Pandey and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 - Rule 19; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulations 220 to 223 and 228; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT46

Advocate for Respondent : N.K. Gupta, Adv.

ORDERRajendra Menon, J.1. As common questions are involved in all these three petitions, they are being disposed of by this common order.1. In W.P. No. 2315/2003, petitioner Satya Narayan Pandey who was working as Head Constable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2005

Gajanana Engineers Vs. the Principal Secy. to Government Energy Depart ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-29-2005

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 5, 6 and 16; Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Rules, 2000 - Rules 27, 28 and 28A; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 226; Indian Administrative Law

Reported in : ILR2005KAR3973

Advocate for Respondent : S. Prakash Shetty, Govt. Adv. for R1, ;N.K. Gupta, Adv. for R2 and R3 and ;T. Seshagiri Rao, Adv. for C/R-4 to R6

S.R. Nayak, J.1. Whether rejection of the tender of the appellant and acceptance of the tender of the contesting respondents 4 to 6 for awarding the contract of repairing the Distribution Transformers of the erstwhile Karnataka...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2001

D.P. Sharma Vs. Bangalore Mahanagara Palike and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-12-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(2) and (3) - Order 32, Rules 1 to 14; Constitution of India - Article 226; High Court of Karnataka Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rule 39

Reported in : AIR2001Kant401; 2001(4)KarLJ132

Advocate for Respondent : Sri Ashok Harnahalli and ;Sri N.K. Gupta, Advs.

ORDERChidananda Ullal, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the orders dated 23-8-2000 in W.P. No. 10256 of 1990 passed by the learned Single Judge, in passing whereof, the learned Single Judge in entertaining a memo...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 20 2000

Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited Vs. Karnataka Electricity ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-20-2000

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Karnataka Electricity Board (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1976 - Sections 2(3) and 5 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR2001Kant30; 2001(2)KarLJ379

Advocate for Respondent : Sri N.K. Gupta, Adv.

ORDER1. In this revision under Section 115 of the CPC petitioner-plaintiff has questioned the legality and correctness of the order dated 13-7-1998 passed by the I Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mangalore in Miscellaneous Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 1990

S.P. Subramanya Shetty Vs. Deputy Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-17-1990

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5A; ;Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1961

Reported in : ILR1990KAR477; 1990(1)KarLJ185

Advocate for Respondent : N.K. Gupta, Govt. Adv.

ORDERMohan, C.J.1. The short facts leading to the Writ Petition are as follows:The petitioners constitute a Hindu Joint Family. They own inter alia properties in Sy.Nos. 93/1 and 93/2 of Kushal nagar Town, Kodagu District and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1986

Narayanappa Vs. Tahsildar and Returning Officer

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-12-1986

Subject : Election

Acts : Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 20(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1986KAR2683

Advocate for Respondent : B.Y. Somayaji, Adv. HCGP for R-1, ;N.K. Gupta , Adv. for R-2 and ;Antony Cruz, Adv. for R-3

ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. Though this petition is listed in the category of Preliminary hearing, by consent of learned Counsel on both the sides, the case is heard for final disposal.2. In this petition under Article 226...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2009

N.M. Giri S/O S.N. Muniswami, Vs. Amr Power Pvt. Ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-20-2009

Subject : ElectricityProperty

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(49) and 164; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 to 19, 19A, 16 and 17; Electricity Supply Act, 1943 - Sections 28(1) and 29; Electricity Act, 1910; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(6)KarLJ267; 2009(6)AIRKarR44

Advocate for Respondent : K.M. Nataraj, Adv. for R1,; N.K. Gupta, Adv. and; H.K. Basavaraj, G.P. for R1 and 4

ORDERAjit J. Gunjal, J.1. Both these writ petitions are disposed of by this common order, in as much as, common question of law arises for consideration.2. In both these writ petitions the petitioners are essentially questioning...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2003

S.M. Rao and ors. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-06-2003

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Sections 28; Indian Telegraphy Act, 1985 - Sections 51; Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 2C(1) and 14(2)

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4678

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Prasad, HCGP for R1, R2 and R7, ;N.K. Gupta, Adv. for R1 to R3 and R4, ;Jayanth M. Pattanshetty, Adv. for R5, ;K.S. Vinay, ;G.S. Srinivas, ;Vishwanath and ;Supiya R. Lupane, Advs. for R4 and R5

Nayak, J.1. What arises for decision in these Writ Appeals and Writ Petition is the validity of the proposal/action of the Karnataka Electricity Board (for short 'the Board') in erecting high tension line over the lands...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 2010

Sri M.J. Shiwani, Aged About 48 Years, S/O Late J.K.Shiwani, Vs. Banga ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-15-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227

Advocate for Respondent : Sri N.K. Gupta. Adv.

ORDER1. Sri N.K. Gupta, learned Counsel is directed to take notice for the respondents.2. In this case, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the provisional assessment order at Annexure 'A' dated 6.10.2010 whereby the second...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1993

i.N. Mahabaleswara Madyasta Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board, Bangalore ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-06-1993

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 5, 12, 69, 70 and 79; Electricity Supply Regulations - Regulations 35 and 41(e); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Karnataka Electricity Board (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1976 - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1994Kant74; ILR1993KAR3398; 1994(1)KarLJ214

Advocate for Respondent : N.K. Gupta, Standing Counsel

1. This appeal is by the plaintiff directed against the order dated 24-7-1989, passed by the 16th Additional City Civil Judge at Bangalore on Preliminary Issue No. 3 in O.S. No. 4716/ 86, dismissing the suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial