Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: n g thakker and · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 2003

Prochy Numazar Mehta Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 48A, 51A and 226; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 154(1), 328, 328(1), 328(3) and 328A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulations 13, 48, 48(3) and 67; Development Control Regulations Rules - Rules 48(3) and 67; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2, 2(7) and 22; Gujarat Minor Mineral Rules, 1966; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Heritage Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 62(2), 67, 67(1) and 67(4); Bombay Law; Bombay High Court (Declaration of Limits) Act, 1945

Reported in : 2003(5)BomCR71

Advocate for Respondent : C.U. Singh and ;P.A. Purandare, Advs. in Writ Petition No. 100 of 2003

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. Rule, Learned Counsel for the respondents waive service. By consent, taken up for hearing and final disposal forthwith. We have heard all the learned counsel at considerable length including the counsel on behalf...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2005

Abdul Jabar Mohammed Ishaq and anr. Vs. Ravindranath Rupa Prajapati an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-20-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2) and 69(2A); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR191

Advocate for Respondent : N.G. Thakker, ;J. Reis and ;G.C. Mohanty, Advs., i/by, ;Kirti N. Damani & Co. for Respondent No. 9 and ;S.V. Shetty, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 7 and 8

D.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard Mr. Pandye . for the appellants. Mr. Thakker with Mr. Reis for Respondent No. 9 and Mr. Shetty for respondent Nos. 1, 3, 7 & 8. The appellants are the original plaintiffs....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2005

Harshad Jethalal Shah and anr. and Maanish Kantilal Patel and anr. Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-08-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6; Specific Relief Act, 1877; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 144

Reported in : 2005(5)BomCR11

Advocate for Respondent : N.G. Thakker, Sr. Counsel, ;Gaurav Joshi and ; A.V. Joshi, Advs., i/b., Mulla & Mulla for Defendant No. 2(c) and ;D.R. Patil, Representative of the Court Receiver present

ORDERS.U. Kamdar, J.1. By the present notice of motion the applicants are challenging clause 4 of the consent terms dated 15.4.2004 executed by and between the plaintiffs and the defendants. By prayer (b), (c) and (d)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 1993

Tata Industitute of Social Sciences Vs. Krishna Kamal Builders and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-1993

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 31 and 37(3)

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR47; (1993)95BOMLR183

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. Gupte and ;N.G. Thakker, Advs., i/b., ;V.L. Punjwani, Adv.

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner seek to set aside the award dated 29th March 1990 made by the Jamshed Burjor Aga the sole arbitrator which has been filed in this Court and numbered...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 1992

Canning Mitra Phoenix Ltd. Vs. M/S. Popular Construction and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-28-1992

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 43 - Order 2, Rule 2(3)

Reported in : AIR1993Bom67; 1994MhLJ812

Advocate for Respondent : N.G. Thakker and ;Ms. Bhadra Dalal, Advs.

ORDER1. On 21st April, 1990, the Plaintiffs filed this suit against the Defendants for declaration that the bank guarantee given by the 2nd Defendants at the instance of the Plaintiffs in favour of the 1st Defendants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1998

Nirfabrics Limited Vs. Nirlon Limited

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-13-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Bombay Relief Undertakings, (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 4; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 and 246; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR50; 1999(1)BomCR362; 1999(1)MhLj512

Advocate for Respondent : N.G. Thakker and ;K.D. Parikh, Advs.

ORDERF.I. Rebello, J.1. Admit. Respondents waive service. By consent heard forthwith. 2. The short, but interesting question that arises in this petition is whether the Notification issued under section 4 of the Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial