Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: n doraisamy · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.047 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 13 2006

Jindalpipes Ltd. Vs. Beard Sell Satec Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-13-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 256 and 256(1)

Reported in : II(2007)BC352; 2006CriLJ3170

Advocate for Respondent : B. Natarajan, ;K. Sridharkumar, Advs. and ;N. Doraisamy, LAC

K.N. Basha, J.1. These appeals against acquittal are preferred by the complainant in C. C. Nos. 5370 and 5371 of 1998 on the file of the learned VII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai-1 challenging the orders...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2007

Shivakumar Vs. Palanisamy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-03-2007

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 311; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1988 - Sections 138 and 139

Reported in : I(2008)BC242

Advocate for Respondent : N. Doraisamy, Legal Aid Counsel

ORDERK.N. Basha, J.1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has come forward with this petition to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Gobichettipalayam in Crl. M.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1995

Sivalingam Vs. the District Magistrate and Collector and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC277

Advocate for Respondent : R. Raghupathi, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. One Sivalingam (petitioner) is the detenu. The detenu, it is said, is a bootlegger. Apart from the ground case, as set out in the grounds of detention, he had come to adverse notice in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 29 2004

Veerasamy @ Sulaiman @ theeviravadhi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 2005(1)CTC4

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayakumar, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Veerasamy, the appellant herein was convicted for the offences under Sections 302 and 324, IPC for having caused the death of one Velayudham and simple injury on one Ramu and sentenced to undergo...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1998

Mahendra Pratap Singh Ratra and anr. Vs. N.K. Metals and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-19-1998

Subject : CommercialCompany

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141, 141(1) and 141(2)

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas152(Delhi); 1998CriLJ4383; 1999(1)Crimes181; 75(1998)DLT155; 1998(47)DRJ87

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Dasi, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

D.K. Jain, J. 1. In this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the petitioners pray for setting aside of the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate on August 17, 1996, directing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1998

M/S. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd., Rep. by Its Authorised Person K. Moh ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 -- Sections 138 and 141; Constitution of India -- Article 21; Essential Commodities Act -- Sections 10; Prevention and Control of Pollution Act, 1994 -- Sections 47 (1) (2)

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD(Cri)794; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)403; [1998]94CompCas879(Mad); 1998(2)CTC372

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M. Kalyanasundaram, Senior Counsel

ORDER1. The petitioner is the complainant in C.C. No.3063 of 1997 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Madras. The respondent as described before this Court is the accused in that case. That was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2006

Lakshmanan Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2006

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ66

R. Balasubramanian, J.1. The appellant in this appeal stands convicted in S.C. No. 35/2003 on the file of the Additional Court of Sessions (Fast Track Court), Kallakurichi for the offence under Section 302, I.P.C., for which,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2003

Pachamuthu Vs. State by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-31-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 2004(1)CTC600

Advocate for Respondent : V.M.R. Rajendran, Public Prosecutor

ORDERA.S. Venkatachalamoorthy, J.1. This Court by an order dated 20.3.2003, nominated Mr. N. Doraisamy as Legal Aid Counsel for prosecuting the matter of behalf of the appellant herein. He has argued this matter and hence whatever...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 2008

Bhimraj Deepchand Solanki Vs. Hansaben P. Mehta and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-05-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR407; 2008(6)MhLj689

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Adsule, APP

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. The petitioner challenges the order passed by the Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Application No. 689 of 1998 on 29-11-1999 setting aside the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 28th Court, Esplanade rejecting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2003

Chandrasekar @ Sekar Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-22-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 307

Reported in : 2003(2)CTC367

Advocate for Respondent : N. Doraisamy, Adv. in R.T. No. 4/2003 and ;I. Subramanian, Public Prosecutor in C.A. No. 397/2003

ORDERN. Dhinakar, J.1. As the Reference and the appeal arise out of a common sessions case, we dispose them of by the following common judgment.2. The appellant, challenging his conviction and sentence of deathimposed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial