Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: n d buch and · Page 1 of about 36 results (0.066 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 14 2005

Anthea Aromatics P. Ltd. Vs. Association of Chemical Workers and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 30, 30(2) and 31(2)

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR995]; (2005)IILLJ1145Bom

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Buch and ;Bina Dholakia, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Heard Mr. A.D. Shetty with Ms. Rita Joshi, T. Shetty for petitioners and N.D. Buch with Ms. Bina Dholakia for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Respondent No. 3 be deleted forthwith.2. Rule. Ms....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1996

Oriental Containers Ltd. Bombay Vs. Engineering Workers Association an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-08-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 10(1), 11A, 12(5), 17B and 33(2)

Reported in : 1996(3)BomCR488; (1996)IILLJ454Bom

Majithia, J. 1. M/s. Oriental Containers Ltd. and Engineering Workers Association, aggrieved against the Award of 11th Labour Court at Bombay in Reference (IDA) No. 711 of 1981 dated June 30, 1994 have moved this Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2007

N.B. Mulani Vs. Inspector General, S.W.S. Central Industrial Security ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 380; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR594; 2008(3)BomCR493; [2007(115)FLR311]; 2007(5)MhLj76

Advocate for Respondent : Ravi Shetty and ;D.A. Dubey, Advs.

R.M. Savant, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was working as a constable in the Central Industrial Security Force is challenging the order dated 13-9-1995 dismissing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 2016

Solapur District Central Co-operative Bank Employees Union, Solapur Vs ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-27-2016

Subject : Education

1. Rule. With the consent of the Learned Counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2. The writ jurisdiction of this Court is invoked against the order dated 19.07.2016 passed by the Learned Member...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1995

Bank Karmachari Sangh Vs. K. R. Pawar, Member, Industrial Court, Pune ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR141; (1996)ILLJ955Bom; 1996(1)MhLj539

B. N. Shrikrishna, J. 1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India impugns an order dated 3rd February 1994 passed by the Industrial Court, Pune in Revision Application (BIR) No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1991

Phoenix Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-03-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Bouns Act, 1965 - Sections 36

Reported in : (1993)IIILLJ844Bom

Advocate for Respondent : H.D. Buch and ;N.D. Buch, Advs. for R-3

Ashok Agarwal, J. 1. The first petitioner is the Phoenix Mills Ltd. engaged in the business of spinning yarn and weaving and processing of cloth and the second petitioner is one of its share-holders. They have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2001

Western India Spinning and Manufacturing Mills Vs. T.N. Mantri, Member ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25N; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(18)

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR362; [2001(89)FLR626]; (2001)ILLJ1491Bom

Advocate for Respondent : P.M. Palshikar and ;N.D. Buch, Advs.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The Maharashtra State Textile Corporation Limited, a State owned Corporation, has been making efforts to improve the economic viability of its Textile Unit at Mumbai, which was nationalised and entrusted to the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1985

The Raja Bahadur Motilal Poona Mills Ltd. Vs. Girni Kamgar Sanghatana ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-06-1985

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(16) and 26; Industrial Disputes Act

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ477Bom

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Buch, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;NEMO for Respondent No. 2

Jahagirdar, J. 1.The petitioner is a Limited Company registered under the Indian Companies Act and is running a cotton textile mill at Pune. The first respondent, hereinafter referred to as the 'respondent', is a trade union...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 1989

The Ichalkaranji Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Deccan Co-operat ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-18-1989

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : (1991)ILLJ220Bom; (1995)IIILLJ405Bom

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Buch, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;H.D. Buch, Adv.

M.L. Dudhat, J.1. The present writ petition is filed against the order dated 3rd September 1986 passed by the Industrial Court at Kolhapur in Complaint (ULP) No. 68 of 1983.2. Respondent No. 1 filed the aforesaid...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 1996

Oriental Containers Ltd. Vs. Engineering Workers' Association and Ors. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-19-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ95Bom

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Buch and ;H.D. Buch, Advs.

ORDERTipnis, J.1. This Notice of Motion seeks that this Court should direct that a criminal complaint be filed against the respondents excepting Respondent No. 2 under the provisions of Section 340 of the Code of Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial