Advanced Search Results

Pastor John Ponnaiah, the Elected Secretary Madras Pentecostal Assembl ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act; Evidence Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 9, Rule 9; Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1597

Advocate for Respondent : R. Neelakantan, G.A. for R1 to R3 and ;N.D. Bahety, Adv. for R4

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. The petitioner claiming to be the elected office bearer of the Madras Pentecostal Assembly, which is a registered Society under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act has filed the present writ petition, seeking...

M.Kumaran, and anr. Vs. J.Rajesh, and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 96

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.N.D.Bahety; M/s.R.S.Ganesh Babu, Advs.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the unsuccessful second and third defendants against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2003 made in O.S.No.1698 of 1997, on the file of the II Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.2....

The Doveton Protestant Schools Association, Rep. by its President H.E. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the common judgment and decretal orders of the XVI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai dated 03.07.2015 passed in C.M.A.Nos.88/2014, 93/2014 and...

Rev Dr.ColIn L.Raymond Vs. Rev Dr.J.Samuel Sudhakar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Original Side Rules - Order 36, Rule 9

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.V.R.Thangavelu Adv.

PRAYER: Appeal filed under Order XXXVI, Rule 9 of O.S.Rules r/w. Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying for the relief stated therein.J U D G M E N T[Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.JYOTHIMANI,...

The Doveton-corrie Protestant. Vs. Dr.Prof.Geoffery K.Francis

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 500, 499; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 248 (1), 378, 397, 401, 503, 505(2); Evidence Act - Section 63, 64, 65, 66, 74

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Adrian D. Rozario, Adv.

Prayer in Crl.A.Nos.840 & 841 of 2004 :Appeal filed under section 378 Cr.P.C., against the order of acquittal dated 14.06.2004 passed in C.C.Nos.9370 of 2001 & 7469 of 2002 by the learned II Metropolitan Magistrates' Court,...

Singer India Limited Vs. Christ Church Rep. by the Secretary of the Pa ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2) and 115 - Order 20, Rule 12 - Order 43

Reported in : (2008)8MLJ727

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Bahety, Adv.

ORDERS. Tamilvanan, J.1. This Revision has been preferred by the petitioner herein against the order, dated 10.03.2004 passed in I.A. No. 23689 of 2003 in O.S. No. 1497 of 1996 on the file of the VI...

Sagayadurai and Others Vs. J.D. Electronics

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT(Cri)753; [1999]95CompCas337(Mad); 1997(2)CTC478

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Bahety, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. The only question that arises for consideration in all these revisions is whether the manager of a partnership firm could file a complaint in the absence of power of attorney or any...

P.R. Hemachandra Babu and anr. Vs. P.R. Janardhanam (Deceased) and Fiv ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925; Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988; Benami Transaction Law

Reported in : III(2003)BC49; 2003(2)CTC424; (2003)2MLJ475

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Bahety, Adv.

ORDERA. Ramamurthi, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiffs, who lost in both the Courts below, are the appellants.2. The case in brief is as follows:- The plaintiffs filed a suit for recovery of possession as well as Rs....

Dipak Mehra Vs. Bindiya Hillary Mehra

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13(1) and 24

Reported in : I(2006)DMC512; (2005)3MLJ256

Advocate for Respondent : N.D. Bahety, Adv.

ORDERS. Sardar Zackria Hussain, J.1. The husband is the revision petitioner and the respondent is the wife. The revision is filed challenging the correctness of the maintenance amount ordered to the respondent payable by her husband,...

P.P. Muthu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Two ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu vexatious litigation (Prevention) Act, 1949; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10(2) and 11(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC279; (1995)IIMLJ447

Advocate for Respondent : P. Sadasivam, Spl. G.P. and ;N.D. Bahety, Adv.

ORDER1. Mr. S.K. Sundaram, Advocate was appearing for the petitioner. At his instance, the matter was adjourned and several occasions. Ultimately, he reported to the court that he had returned the papers to the party with...