Advanced Search Results
Chitta Ranjan Guha and anr. Vs. M. Ameen
Kolkata
Jan-16-1948
Company
ORDERChakravartti, J.1. The petitioner 1 before me, Ranjan Guha, is the Managing Director of a Bank, called the New National Bank limited and petitioner 2 N. Chakravarty, appsara to hold a multiplicity of offices, seeing that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyam Sing Vs. Saibalini Ghose
Kolkata
Jul-17-1946
Criminal
AIR1947Cal183
Ellis, J.1. In this case, a Rule was issued on the District Magistrate of Burdwan and on the opposite party Saibalini Ghose to show cause why an order passed by Mr. P.C. Gope, Magistrate of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRampalat Shaw Vs. Corporation of Calcutta
Kolkata
Feb-05-1962
Civil
Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Section 583
AIR1966Cal99,1966CriLJ260
Balin Basu, Adv.
ORDERS.K. Niyogi, J. 1. This Rule is directed against an older of a Municipal Magistrate, Calcutta, directing the removal of a particular nuisance com-plained of within a month from the date of the order under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Prabha Dutt Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-1981
Media and CommunicationConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 32; Superintendence and Management of Jails Manual - Rules 549(4), 552A and 559A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
AIR1982SC6; (1982)84BOMLR65; 1982CriLJ148; 1981(3)SCALE1757; (1982)1SCC1; [1982]1SCR1184; 1981(13)LC848(SC)
A. Subhashini for Respondent No. 1., ; N.C. Talukdar, ; K.S. G
ORDERY.V. Chandrachud, C.J.1. This is a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution by the Chief Reporter of the Hindustan Times, Smt. Prabha Dutt, asking for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatish Chandra Chakrabarty Vs. Subrata Majumdar
Kolkata
Jun-24-1964
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 231 and 233; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 234, 323 and 504
AIR1966Cal67,1966CriLJ142
N.C. Talukdar, Adv.
ORDERAmaresh Roy, J.1. These three Rules arise out of an order governing three cases made by the Magistrate Sri A.K. Roy Choudhury by which he has directed that the three cases shall be tried in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSen Mahasay and anr. Vs. Corporation of Calcutta
Kolkata
Aug-20-1964
CriminalFood Adulteration
Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Section 442; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Section 25; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules - Rule 50; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 439
AIR1966Cal203,1966CriLJ525
N.C. Talukdar, Adv.
ORDERK.C. Sen, J.1. This Rule is directed against the Order of Shri. B. Moitra, the learned Senior Municipal Magistrate of Calcutta whereby he has convieled the petitioners because of infringement of the provision of Section 442...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeople's Union for Democratic Rights and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOi) ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-18-1982
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 17, 21, 23, 24 and 32; Employment of Children Act, 1938 - Sections 3(3); Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 - Sections 13 to 19; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 20 and 21; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Labour Law; Equal Remuneration Act, 1946; Equal Remuneration (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 4
AIR1982SC1473; 1982(0)BLJR401; (1982)IILLJ454SC; 1982(1)SCALE818; (1982)3SCC235; [1983]1SCR456; 1982(14)LC657(SC)
A. Subhashini, Adv. for Respondent No. 1., ; N.C. Talukdar and ;
P.N. Bhagwatil, J.1. This is a writ petition brought by way of public interest litigation in order to ensure observance of the provisions of various labour laws in relation to workmen employed in the construction work...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBira Kishore Naik Vs. Coal India Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-07-1986
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 32; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Sections 3(3) and 14; Coal Mines (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3(2) and 3(5); Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 2-A(1) and 17; Payment of Wages (Mines) Rules, 1956
AIR1986SC2123; 1986LabIC1944; (1986)IILLJ139SC; 1986(1)SCALE1300; (1986)3SCC338; [1986]2SCR1044; 1986(2)LC293(SC)
L.N. Sinha, ; Tapas Roy, ; N.C. Talukdar, ;
K.N. Singh, J.1. By means of this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court purporting to do so on behalf of 700 workmen claiming relief for issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Aluminium Cables Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-27-1985
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 35 and 36
AIR1985SC1201; 1985(6)ECC126; 1985(21)ELT3(SC); 1985(1)SCALE976; (1985)3SCC284; [1985]Supp1SCR731; [1987]64STC180(SC); 1985(17)LC1070(SC)
M.M. Abdul Khader, ; N.C. Talukdar, ; Girish Chandra, ;
1. These two appeals involve the question as to whether 'Properzi Rods' manufactured and cleared by the appellant, the Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd., fall within Entry No. 27 (a)(ii) of the First Schedule to the Central...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFood Corporation of India Workers' Union Vs. Food Corporation of India ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-01-1985
Labour and Industrial
Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 5 and 10
AIR1985SC488; 1985(33)BLJR307; 1985(1)SCALE383; (1985)2SCC294; [1985]3SCR150; 1985(1)SLJ658(SC); 1985(17)LC849(SC)
Kishan Dayal, ; N.C. Talukdar, ; R.N. Poddar, ;
1. This is representative action brought on behalf of the Contract Labourers, working with the Food Corporation of India, the first respondent in the writ petition, distressed by the unhelpful attitude of both the Central and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »