Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: n c sen gupta · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.127 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 27 1952

Aswini Kumar Ghosh and anr. Vs. Arabinda Bose and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-27-1952

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 4(2), 5(1), 8(1), 9(4), 14 and 14(3); Supreme Court Advocates (Practice in High Courts) Act, 1951 - Sections 2; Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules; Bombay High Court Original Side Rules; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 119 - Order I, Rule 2 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order IV, Rule 11 - Order IV, Rule 12 - Order IV, Rule 30 - Order IV, Rule 31

Reported in : AIR1952SC369; [1953]4SCR1

Patanjali Sastri, C.J.1. This is an application under article 32 of the Constitution for relief in respect of an alleged infringement of the fundamental right of the petitioners under article 19(1)(g) or, alternatively, under article 136...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1952

Subodh Gopal Bose Vs. Brojendra Kishore Roy

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-11-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 100 - Order 41, Rules 25 and 26 - Order 42, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1954Cal90

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta, ;Jitendra Kumar Sen Gupta, ;Jatish Chandra Guha and ;Ramendra Mohan Chatterjee, Advs.

K.S. Das Gupta, J.1. The .52 acre of land for which the present litigation was started by the respondent more than 15 years ago lies in mouza Chandpur in the suburbs of Calcutta. While the greater...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1953

Sri Bansi Gopal Jiu and ors. Vs. Uday Chand Mahatab and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-19-1953

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913 - Sections 7, 36 and 37; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 11

Reported in : AIR1954Cal113

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta and ;Purushottam Chatterjee, Advs. (for No. 2) and ;Sarat Kumar Mitra and ;Promode Kumar Ghose, Advs. (for No. 1)

Chakravartti, C.J.1. In this appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, two interesting points were canvassed before us, of which one was not considered by Mr. Justice Mookerjee, against whose decision the appeal is directed.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 04 1951

Haripada Dutta Vs. Ananta Mandal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-04-1951

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; ;West Bengal Bargadars Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 9(1), 18 and 19; ;West Bengal Bargadars Rules - Rule 7(3)

Reported in : AIR1952Cal526,56CWN124

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta and ;Biswa Nath Bajpayee, Advs.

Chakravartti, J.1. This Rule raises a fundamental question under the West Bengal Bargadars Act, 1950. It was contended that a Conciliation, Board established under the Act or an Appellate Officer appointed under it, was not a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 1957

Subodh Kumar Banerjee and ors. Vs. Soshi Kumar Banerjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-29-1957

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45 and 114; ;Succession Act, 1925 - Section 276

Reported in : AIR1958Cal264

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta, ;Apurbadhan Mukherjee, ;Sambhunath Banerjee, ;Monmohan Mukherjee and ;Samarendra Nath Banerjee, Advs.

S.R. Das Gupta, J.1. This appeal, arises out of an order made by the learned District Judge of 24 Parganas on 3-6-1953 granting a probate of an alleged Will of late Ramtaran Banerjee. The caveators are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1952

Mandal Ghat Zemindary Syndicate Ltd. Vs. Gour Mohan Mullick and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-10-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 133(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 110

Reported in : AIR1953Cal509

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta and ;Chandra Nath Mukherjee, Advs.

Chakravartti, C.J. 1. This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court from a judgment and decree passed by a Division Bench of this Court in a First Appeal. The judgment is one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1954

Bhabatosh Ghattak Vs. Sm. Joy Kumari Devi and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-09-1954

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 116; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 103

Reported in : AIR1955Cal229,58CWN602

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta, ;Urukramdas Chakravartty, Advs.

Das J.1. This is an appeal by the defendant under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the decision of a learned Judge of this Court dated the 15th of June, 1953.2. The plaintiffs were admittedly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1949

indra Chand Dutt Choudhury and ors. Vs. Tinkari Ghose and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-09-1949

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Section 182; ;Bengal Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1928; ;Tenancy Law

Reported in : AIR1950Cal170

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta and ;Provash Chandra Chatterjee, Advs.

R.P. Mookerjee, J.1. This appeal is on behalf of the plaintiff a against the decision by the Courts below dismissing the plaintiffs' suit against the defend-ants for ejectment.2. The principal question in issue in this appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1952

Lodna Colliery Co. (1920) Ltd. Vs. Bholanath Rai and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-11-1952

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 48 and 144; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 26, Rule 9 - Order 39, Rule 7; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 32 and 32(2)

Reported in : AIR1954Cal233,58CWN227

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta, ;Jagadish Chandra Ghosh and ;Satya Priya Ghosh, Advs.

R.P. Mookerjee, J. 1. The plaintiffs respondents filed the suit out of which this appeal arises for damages for coalwrongfully taken away by the defendant company from underneath the lands belonging to the plaintiffs and for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1951

Hemanga Coomar Mookherjee and ors. Vs. M.C. Chakravarty

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-30-1951

Subject : Banking

Acts : Banking Companies (Amendment) Act, 1950 - Section 11; ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 58; ; Companies Act, 1913 - Section 178; ; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 45A and 45B

Reported in : AIR1952Cal732,[1952]22CompCas270(Cal),56CWN632

Advocate for Respondent : N.C. Sen Gupta and ; Paritosh Sarkar, Advs.

Chakravartti, J.1. This Rule which involves a a short point under the Banking Companies (Amendment) Act 1950, arises out of the following facts.2. The petitioners are the owners of Premises No. 10B Canal Circular Road, Calcutta,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial