Advanced Search Results

Ludur Vs. Ram Raj and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939 - Sections 183; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR1954All171

Advocate for Respondent : N. Bannerji, Adv.

Randhir Singh, J.1. This appeal originally came up for hearing before a learned single Judge of this Court who thought that the points involved in this case reserved consideration by a Division Bench. The case was...

Hari Shankar Vs. Narendra Pratap Bahadur Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 6 and 9

Reported in : AIR1973All561

Advocate for Respondent : N. Bannerji and ;S.K. Srivastava, Advs.

1. This second appeal arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiff respondents Nos. 1 to 7 for recovery of their half share in the rent realised by the defendant-appellant from the defendant-respondents Nos. 8...

Neelam Prints Vs. Deputy Supdt., Central Excise and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1) and 10

Reported in : 1982(10)ELT895(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : H.S. Brar and; Kanwaljit Singh, Advs.

I.S. Tiwana, J.1. The petitioner concern established in the year 1963 is engaged in the business of dyeing and printing of artificial silk fabrics. Admittedly till the issuance of notification dated April 24, 1962 (Annexure P-l)...

T.S. Sivasubramanyam and anr. Vs. the State of Madras, Represented by ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ214

ORDERT. Venakatadri, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is whether the order of the Government, refusing to refer the dispute in this case for adjudication on...

Guddumal and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 195 and 195(1); ;Himachal Pradesh (Courts) Order, 1948

Reported in : AIR1953HP38

Advocate for Respondent : Bakshi Sita Ram, Govt. Adv.

Chowdhry, J.C.1. This is an application in revision by Guddumal and Thuniamal against anorder of Sri Devaki Nandan Magistrate firstclass Kasumpti, dated 24-7-1951, passed in thefollowing circumstances.2. One Amichand sued the petitioners on 30-11-1946 for recovery...

Dharam Pal Vs. the State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 118 and 133; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 367

Reported in : AIR1971HP17,1971CriLJ1750

Advocate for Respondent : K.D. Sud, Adv.

D.B. Lal, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kangra at Dharamsala, whereby he has convicted Dharampal aged 17 years. under Section 376 of the Indian Penal...