Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: n a · Page 1 of about 396,667 results (2.545 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 29 2026

Rama CIVIL India Construction Private Ltd Through Authorized Represent ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Arbitration

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 24.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 29.05.2026+ ARB.P. 1787/2025, I.A. 30458/2025 (U/O 1 Rule 10), I.A. O.A. 42/2026 (Seeking setting aside of the order dt....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1996

Chongtham Gulamani Singh Vs. Koijam Ibotomi Singh

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-26-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Advocate for Respondent : N. Kerani Singh, Sr. Adv.

N. Surjamani Singh, J. 1. This revision petition underSection 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure arises from the order dated 2nd March, 1996 passed by the learned Muhsiff, Imphal, Manipur in Judicial Misc. Case No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2006

Committee of Management of Saint Andrews Inter College Through Its Man ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-27-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Companies Act; Payment of Salaries Act, 1971 - Sections 5; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16A, 16D, 16D(5A) and 16D(1) to 16D(14)

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1794

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Khare,; S.B. Singh, ; K.C. Shukla,; R.K. Ojha,; N.L. Pandey,; Uma Shanker Singh and ; Ramendra Asthana, Advs. and S.C.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Both these writ petitions arise out of the same cause of action and hence they have been heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. Pleadings in both the writ petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 19 2025

S.Sathyanarayanan vs Apoorva I.a.S

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-19-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 11.12.2025 DELIVERED ON : 19.12.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN LPA No.56 of 2025 S.Sathyanarayanan .. Appellant vs. 1.Selvi. Apporva, I.A.S., Principal Secretary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2006

Sathyan Vs. Yousu

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-27-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 13, 30, 78, 79, 80, 81, 117 and 138; Fatal Accidents Act, 1855; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 357(1) and 357(3); Bills of Exchange Act, Sections 57(1)

Reported in : IV(2007)BC1; 2007CriLJ2590; 2006(4)KLT923

Advocate for Respondent : V.M. Krishna Kumar, Adv.; Sai George, Public Prosecutor and V.N. Shankerjee, Amicus Curiae

ORDERR. Basant, J.1. Does the criminal court have the power to direct payment of interest on the amount of compensation directed to be paid under Section 357(3) of the Cr.P.C? This interesting question arises for consideration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1983

V.S. Murty and ors. Vs. Deputy Chief Accounts Officer and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-22-1983

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules, 1961 - Rules 3(2) and 36

Reported in : AIR1983SC403; 1983LabIC495; (1983)ILLJ357SC; 1983(1)SCALE169; (1983)2SCC115; [1983]2SCR404; 1983(1)SLJ445(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : P.P. Rai, ; G.N. Rao, ; for the Respondent No. 1., ;

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the decision in Writ Petition No. 1021 of 1975 filed in the Andhra Pradesh High Court at Hyderabad which came to be transferred under para 14(1) of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2020

Rasheed vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-29-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON MONDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1942 Bail Appl..No.3623 OF 2020 (crime No.803/2020 of Mathilakam Police Station) PETITIONER/S:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2005

Ram Saran Son of Ganesh Prasad Vs. Food Corporation of India Through I ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-05-2005

Subject : ServiceCivil

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC1660

Advocate for Respondent : Satya Prakash, ;N.P. Singh and ;M.D. Misra, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Heard Sri Chandra Bhan Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri N.P.Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged and with the consent of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2004

Veekay Connectors (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. National Small Industries Corp ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-02-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 299

Reported in : AIR2005All57

Advocate for Respondent : B.N. Singh, Adv. and ;C.S. Singh, S.C.

1. Heard Sri S. P. Gupta, learned Senior counsel and Shri Yeshwant Verma for the petitioner and Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 and Sri B. N. Singh, learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2006

Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (a Deemed to Be Univers ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-13-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 2 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20(1), 22, 23 and 24; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2 3, 10, 10(1), 11 11(1), 11(3), 11(4), 13, 22 and 22(2); All India Council for Technical Education Regulations, 2005, - Rules 3, 4 and 5; All India Council for Technical Education Regulations, 1994 - Regulation 3; University Grants Commission (Inspection of Universities) Rules, 2004 - Rule 3; University Grants Commission (Returns of Information by Universities) Rules, 2004; Constitution of India - Article 14; Bharathidasan University Act, 1981; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : (2006)3MLJ870

Advocate for Respondent : R. Vaigai, Adv. for R-11, ;Vijay Narayanan, Senior Counsel for ;Sathish Parasaran, Adv. for R-6, R-77 and R-12 in W.P. 8401/2006, ;N.R. Chandran, Senior Counsel for ;R. Natarajan, Adv. in for R-9 in W

ORDERPrabha Sridevan, J.1. The answer to the following questions will decide the lis between the parties in all these writ petitions:(1) What are the parameters of power of the All India Council for Technical Education over...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial