Advanced Search Results

Mohammad Tahair Vs. Syed Khaja Ali and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53-A; Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 47(1)

Reported in : AIR1973Kant307; AIR1973Mys307; (1973)2MysLJ94

Advocate for Respondent : Murlidhar Rao, Adv.

Venkataswami, J.1. This is a defendant's appeal under Section 96 of the C. P. Code. The suit in question was O. S. No. 72 of 1968 on the file of the Civil Judge at Bidar. The...

Brijendra Pratap Singh (Deceased by Lr) and anr. Vs. Smt. Prem Lata Si ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act; Hindu law

Reported in : AIR2005All113; 2005(3)AWC2277

Advocate for Respondent : R.N. Singh, ;S.N. Singh, ;A.K. Rai and ;Tarun Verma, Advs.

ORDERJanardan Sahai, J.1. This appeal is about a house No. C-7/67 situate in Mohalla Senpura, at Varanasi. A dispute arose between two brothers Surendra Pratap Singh and Brijendra Pratap Singh. Surendra Pratap Singh brought a suit...

Salimbhai Abdulgaffar Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 173(2), 173(8), 389, 437, 439, and 482; Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 34, 34(1), 34(3), 34(4) 35, 39, 47(7), 49, 49(6) and 49(7)

Reported in : (2003)3GLR1899

Advocate for Respondent : Kamal Trivedi, Addl. Adv. General and; A.D. Oza, Public Prosecutor

C.K. Buch, J.Rule, Mr. A. D. Oza learned Public Prosecutor waives Rule on behalf of the respondent-Government in all matters.1. All these Misc. Cri. Applications have been moved by the accused persons for bail in connection...

Indian Wood Products Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4) and 51; Forest Produce Rules, 1978 - Rules 25 and 28; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 301 and 304

Reported in : AIR1999All222

Advocate for Respondent : A.G.A.

Binod Kumar Roy, J.1. Whether Factory or Mill prepared 'Catechu' or Katha is a 'Forest Produce', as defined under Section 2(4) of the Forest Act is the real question which requires our adjudication in this writ...

Shib Charan Das Vs. Muqaddam and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1936All62; 158Ind.Cas.643

Iqbal Ahmad, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit for sale on a mortgage dated 8th March 1919, and the sole question for consideration in the appeal is whether -or not the Courts below were...

Pakkirisamy Vs. State of T.N.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - , - Sections 164; Evidence Act, - Sections 27

Reported in : 1997(2)ALD(Cri)695; 1998CriLJ89; JT1997(8)SC310; 1997(6)SCALE315; (1997)8SCC158; 1998(1)LC101(SC)

1. The Sessions Court of East Thanjavur at Nagappattinam as also the High Court at Madras by their concurrent judgments and orders found the appellant guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 392 IPC...

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. J. Krishnamurthy

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1997)11SCC467

S.C. Agrawal and; G.T. Nanavati, JJ.1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 29-9-1992 passed by the High Court of Madras in Writ Appeal No. 1320 of 1988 arising out of Writ Petition No....

Rodamal Lalchand Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala-ii.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1977]109ITR7(P& H)

KULWANT SINGH TIWANA J. - The question formulated for reference under section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act referred to this court is as under :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,...

Murlidhar and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 147, 148, 149, 201, 302, 364, 379, 394 and 397; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106 and 114

Reported in : AIR2005SC2345; 2005(2)ALD(Cri)363; 2005CriLJ2608; JT2005(5)SC358; (2005)11SCC133; 2005(2)LC915(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Manish Kumar and ; Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Advs.

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. The three appellants before this Court by special leave impugn the judgment of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan which has convicted them on charges under Sections 364, 302/34 IPC and sentenced...

Mohd. Abdul Sathar Khan Vs. Sub-divisional Magistrate, Bidar and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397, 397(1), 435 and 439

Advocate for Respondent : Murlidhar Rao, Adv., ;M.R. Achar, Govt. Adv. and ;K. Shivashankar Bhat, Sr. Standing Counsel for Central Government

Venkatachala, J.1. In this writ petition, important questions arise for determination. 2. Material facts are briefly these : On the coming into force of the Karnataka Debt Relief Act, 1976 (hereinafter to be referred to as...